Integrating Uncertainty Quantification into Computational Fluid Dynamics Models of Coronary Arteries Under Steady Flow.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS
Muhammad Usman, Peter Castillo, Akil Narayan, Lucas H Timmins
{"title":"Integrating Uncertainty Quantification into Computational Fluid Dynamics Models of Coronary Arteries Under Steady Flow.","authors":"Muhammad Usman, Peter Castillo, Akil Narayan, Lucas H Timmins","doi":"10.1115/1.4071773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Computational fluid dynamics simulations are increasingly being integrated into clinical medicine, where they have the potential to support clinicians in disease diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. However, these models frequently use deterministic approaches, neglecting inherent variability (or uncertainty) in input parameters, thereby undermining model credibility and limiting clinical adoption. Herein, we integrate modern and certifiable uncertainty quantification (UQ) techniques to characterize and quantify the variability in coronary artery wall shear stress (WSS) under steady flow conditions due to intrinsic uncertainty in model-dependent quantities. Univariate probability distributions were fit to hemodynamic parameters (density, pressure, radius, velocity, viscosity), and sampled parameter ensembles were applied to an analytical solution (Poiseuille flow) and a patient-specific coronary artery model. Results from the analytical solution demonstrated that variability in input parameters propagated to uncertainty in WSS values, with uncertainty in velocity accounting for the majority (~79%) of WSS variability. In the patient-specific model, spatial medians in WSS varied by ~50% due to input parameter uncertainties, with viscosity (~59%) and velocity (~40%) emerging as the dominant contributors to WSS variability. Across each use case unary interactions dominated (i.e., first-order Sobol indices accounted for the majority of the variance), contributing to ~93% and ~99% of the total WSS variance in the analytical and patient-specific model, respectively. Collectively, this study establishes an uncertainty-aware framework to strengthen computational biomechanics model credibility, aligning with emerging regulatory guidance and enabling more trustworthy modeling-based decision support in the management of coronary artery disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":54871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","volume":" ","pages":"1-41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4071773","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Computational fluid dynamics simulations are increasingly being integrated into clinical medicine, where they have the potential to support clinicians in disease diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. However, these models frequently use deterministic approaches, neglecting inherent variability (or uncertainty) in input parameters, thereby undermining model credibility and limiting clinical adoption. Herein, we integrate modern and certifiable uncertainty quantification (UQ) techniques to characterize and quantify the variability in coronary artery wall shear stress (WSS) under steady flow conditions due to intrinsic uncertainty in model-dependent quantities. Univariate probability distributions were fit to hemodynamic parameters (density, pressure, radius, velocity, viscosity), and sampled parameter ensembles were applied to an analytical solution (Poiseuille flow) and a patient-specific coronary artery model. Results from the analytical solution demonstrated that variability in input parameters propagated to uncertainty in WSS values, with uncertainty in velocity accounting for the majority (~79%) of WSS variability. In the patient-specific model, spatial medians in WSS varied by ~50% due to input parameter uncertainties, with viscosity (~59%) and velocity (~40%) emerging as the dominant contributors to WSS variability. Across each use case unary interactions dominated (i.e., first-order Sobol indices accounted for the majority of the variance), contributing to ~93% and ~99% of the total WSS variance in the analytical and patient-specific model, respectively. Collectively, this study establishes an uncertainty-aware framework to strengthen computational biomechanics model credibility, aligning with emerging regulatory guidance and enabling more trustworthy modeling-based decision support in the management of coronary artery disease.

冠状动脉稳态血流计算流体动力学模型的不确定性量化。
计算流体动力学模拟越来越多地被整合到临床医学中,在那里它们有可能支持临床医生进行疾病诊断、预后和治疗。然而,这些模型经常使用确定性方法,忽略了输入参数的内在变异性(或不确定性),从而破坏了模型的可信度并限制了临床应用。在此,我们整合了现代和可认证的不确定性量化(UQ)技术来表征和量化稳定流动条件下冠状动脉壁剪切应力(WSS)的变异性,这是由于模型相关量的内在不确定性。单变量概率分布拟合血流动力学参数(密度、压力、半径、速度、粘度),采样参数集合应用于解析解(泊泽维尔流)和患者特异性冠状动脉模型。解析解的结果表明,输入参数的可变性会传播到WSS值的不确定性,其中速度的不确定性占WSS变异性的大部分(~79%)。在患者特异性模型中,由于输入参数的不确定性,WSS的空间中位数变化了~50%,其中粘度(~59%)和速度(~40%)成为WSS变异性的主要贡献者。在每个用例中,一元交互占主导地位(即,一阶Sobol指数占方差的大部分),分别占分析模型和患者特定模型中总WSS方差的93%和99%。总的来说,本研究建立了一个不确定性意识框架,以加强计算生物力学模型的可信度,与新兴的监管指导保持一致,并在冠状动脉疾病的管理中实现更可信的基于模型的决策支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs and Prostheses; Bioinstrumentation and Measurements; Bioheat Transfer; Biomaterials; Biomechanics; Bioprocess Engineering; Cellular Mechanics; Design and Control of Biological Systems; Physiological Systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书