Samantha Goodman, Matthew J Dann, Hanan Abramovici
{"title":"Differences in higher-risk cannabis use outcomes across Canadian provinces and territories: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Samantha Goodman, Matthew J Dann, Hanan Abramovici","doi":"10.17269/s41997-026-01202-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In 2018, Canada legalized and regulated the production and sale of cannabis for non-medical purposes. This paper examined the prevalence of 'higher risk' cannabis use outcomes across Canadian provinces and territories (PTs), with rates hypothesized to be lower in Quebec and higher in the territories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Past 12-month cannabis consumers from the 2023 and 2024 cycles of the Canadian Cannabis Survey were included (n = 7238). A previous study identified 16 higher risk cannabis use outcomes. Logistic regression models tested differences in each outcome by PT (10 provinces; three territories combined) or region (Western Canada, Ontario, Quebec, Atlantic Canada, territories).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Newfoundland and the territories had the highest rates of frequent cannabis use, and Alberta had the highest rate of inhalable cannabis extract use. Consumers in Quebec reported among the lowest rates of five 'higher risk' outcomes (including frequent cannabis use, past 12-month use of inhalable cannabis extracts, and use of extracts containing > 30% THC). In contrast, they reported among the highest rates of several other outcomes, including consuming edibles/beverages with > 10 mg THC/unit (despite a provincial limit of 5 mg/unit) and obtaining cannabis from illicit sources. The territories had high rates of frequent cannabis use; however, they did not differ significantly from the provinces on most outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Quebec continues to differ from other PTs in several domains. Differences are likely due to historically lower rates of cannabis use in Quebec, including lower use of extracts, combined with the province's restrictions on product sales, including cannabis products with > 30% THC.</p>","PeriodicalId":51407,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-026-01202-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: In 2018, Canada legalized and regulated the production and sale of cannabis for non-medical purposes. This paper examined the prevalence of 'higher risk' cannabis use outcomes across Canadian provinces and territories (PTs), with rates hypothesized to be lower in Quebec and higher in the territories.
Methods: Past 12-month cannabis consumers from the 2023 and 2024 cycles of the Canadian Cannabis Survey were included (n = 7238). A previous study identified 16 higher risk cannabis use outcomes. Logistic regression models tested differences in each outcome by PT (10 provinces; three territories combined) or region (Western Canada, Ontario, Quebec, Atlantic Canada, territories).
Results: Newfoundland and the territories had the highest rates of frequent cannabis use, and Alberta had the highest rate of inhalable cannabis extract use. Consumers in Quebec reported among the lowest rates of five 'higher risk' outcomes (including frequent cannabis use, past 12-month use of inhalable cannabis extracts, and use of extracts containing > 30% THC). In contrast, they reported among the highest rates of several other outcomes, including consuming edibles/beverages with > 10 mg THC/unit (despite a provincial limit of 5 mg/unit) and obtaining cannabis from illicit sources. The territories had high rates of frequent cannabis use; however, they did not differ significantly from the provinces on most outcomes.
Conclusions: Quebec continues to differ from other PTs in several domains. Differences are likely due to historically lower rates of cannabis use in Quebec, including lower use of extracts, combined with the province's restrictions on product sales, including cannabis products with > 30% THC.
期刊介绍:
The Canadian Journal of Public Health is dedicated to fostering excellence in public health research, scholarship, policy and practice. The aim of the Journal is to advance public health research and practice in Canada and around the world, thus contributing to the improvement of the health of populations and the reduction of health inequalities.
CJPH publishes original research and scholarly articles submitted in either English or French that are relevant to population and public health.
CJPH is an independent, peer-reviewed journal owned by the Canadian Public Health Association and published by Springer.
Énoncé de mission
La Revue canadienne de santé publique se consacre à promouvoir l’excellence dans la recherche, les travaux d’érudition, les politiques et les pratiques de santé publique. Son but est de faire progresser la recherche et les pratiques de santé publique au Canada et dans le monde, contribuant ainsi à l’amélioration de la santé des populations et à la réduction des inégalités de santé.
La RCSP publie des articles savants et des travaux inédits, soumis en anglais ou en français, qui sont d’intérêt pour la santé publique et des populations.
La RCSP est une revue indépendante avec comité de lecture, propriété de l’Association canadienne de santé publique et publiée par Springer.