Differences in higher-risk cannabis use outcomes across Canadian provinces and territories: A cross-sectional study.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Samantha Goodman, Matthew J Dann, Hanan Abramovici
{"title":"Differences in higher-risk cannabis use outcomes across Canadian provinces and territories: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Samantha Goodman, Matthew J Dann, Hanan Abramovici","doi":"10.17269/s41997-026-01202-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In 2018, Canada legalized and regulated the production and sale of cannabis for non-medical purposes. This paper examined the prevalence of 'higher risk' cannabis use outcomes across Canadian provinces and territories (PTs), with rates hypothesized to be lower in Quebec and higher in the territories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Past 12-month cannabis consumers from the 2023 and 2024 cycles of the Canadian Cannabis Survey were included (n = 7238). A previous study identified 16 higher risk cannabis use outcomes. Logistic regression models tested differences in each outcome by PT (10 provinces; three territories combined) or region (Western Canada, Ontario, Quebec, Atlantic Canada, territories).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Newfoundland and the territories had the highest rates of frequent cannabis use, and Alberta had the highest rate of inhalable cannabis extract use. Consumers in Quebec reported among the lowest rates of five 'higher risk' outcomes (including frequent cannabis use, past 12-month use of inhalable cannabis extracts, and use of extracts containing > 30% THC). In contrast, they reported among the highest rates of several other outcomes, including consuming edibles/beverages with > 10 mg THC/unit (despite a provincial limit of 5 mg/unit) and obtaining cannabis from illicit sources. The territories had high rates of frequent cannabis use; however, they did not differ significantly from the provinces on most outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Quebec continues to differ from other PTs in several domains. Differences are likely due to historically lower rates of cannabis use in Quebec, including lower use of extracts, combined with the province's restrictions on product sales, including cannabis products with > 30% THC.</p>","PeriodicalId":51407,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-026-01202-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In 2018, Canada legalized and regulated the production and sale of cannabis for non-medical purposes. This paper examined the prevalence of 'higher risk' cannabis use outcomes across Canadian provinces and territories (PTs), with rates hypothesized to be lower in Quebec and higher in the territories.

Methods: Past 12-month cannabis consumers from the 2023 and 2024 cycles of the Canadian Cannabis Survey were included (n = 7238). A previous study identified 16 higher risk cannabis use outcomes. Logistic regression models tested differences in each outcome by PT (10 provinces; three territories combined) or region (Western Canada, Ontario, Quebec, Atlantic Canada, territories).

Results: Newfoundland and the territories had the highest rates of frequent cannabis use, and Alberta had the highest rate of inhalable cannabis extract use. Consumers in Quebec reported among the lowest rates of five 'higher risk' outcomes (including frequent cannabis use, past 12-month use of inhalable cannabis extracts, and use of extracts containing > 30% THC). In contrast, they reported among the highest rates of several other outcomes, including consuming edibles/beverages with > 10 mg THC/unit (despite a provincial limit of 5 mg/unit) and obtaining cannabis from illicit sources. The territories had high rates of frequent cannabis use; however, they did not differ significantly from the provinces on most outcomes.

Conclusions: Quebec continues to differ from other PTs in several domains. Differences are likely due to historically lower rates of cannabis use in Quebec, including lower use of extracts, combined with the province's restrictions on product sales, including cannabis products with > 30% THC.

加拿大各省和地区高风险大麻使用结果的差异:一项横断面研究。
目标:2018年,加拿大将非医疗用途大麻的生产和销售合法化并加以管制。本文研究了加拿大各省和地区(PTs)“高风险”大麻使用结果的流行情况,假设魁北克的比率较低,而其他地区的比率较高。方法:纳入2023年和2024年加拿大大麻调查周期中过去12个月的大麻消费者(n = 7238)。之前的一项研究确定了16种高风险的大麻使用结果。逻辑回归模型通过PT(10个省;三个地区合并)或地区(加拿大西部,安大略省,魁北克省,加拿大大西洋地区,地区)测试每个结果的差异。结果:纽芬兰和领地的频繁大麻使用率最高,阿尔伯塔省的可吸入大麻提取物使用率最高。魁北克的消费者报告了五种“高风险”结果(包括频繁使用大麻、过去12个月使用可吸入大麻提取物和使用含有30%四氢大麻酚的提取物)的最低比率。相比之下,他们报告的其他几项结果的比率最高,包括食用含有10毫克四氢大麻酚/单位的食品/饮料(尽管省级限制为5毫克/单位)和从非法来源获得大麻。这些领土经常使用大麻的比例很高;然而,他们在大多数结果上与各省没有显著差异。结论:魁北克在几个领域继续与其他PTs不同。这种差异可能是由于魁北克省历史上较低的大麻使用率,包括较低的提取物使用,以及该省对产品销售的限制,包括含有50 - 30%四氢大麻酚的大麻产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique
Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.70%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Public Health is dedicated to fostering excellence in public health research, scholarship, policy and practice. The aim of the Journal is to advance public health research and practice in Canada and around the world, thus contributing to the improvement of the health of populations and the reduction of health inequalities. CJPH publishes original research and scholarly articles submitted in either English or French that are relevant to population and public health. CJPH is an independent, peer-reviewed journal owned by the Canadian Public Health Association and published by Springer.   Énoncé de mission La Revue canadienne de santé publique se consacre à promouvoir l’excellence dans la recherche, les travaux d’érudition, les politiques et les pratiques de santé publique. Son but est de faire progresser la recherche et les pratiques de santé publique au Canada et dans le monde, contribuant ainsi à l’amélioration de la santé des populations et à la réduction des inégalités de santé. La RCSP publie des articles savants et des travaux inédits, soumis en anglais ou en français, qui sont d’intérêt pour la santé publique et des populations. La RCSP est une revue indépendante avec comité de lecture, propriété de l’Association canadienne de santé publique et publiée par Springer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书