Comparative Study between Conventional Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication and Modified Nissen Fundoplication: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Q2 Medicine
Khaled Mohamed Albeialy, Mohamed Mahfouz Mohamed, Mohamed Ibrahim Hassan, Mohamed Ezzat Elserafy, Moustafa Mahmoud Emad
{"title":"Comparative Study between Conventional Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication and Modified Nissen Fundoplication: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Khaled Mohamed Albeialy, Mohamed Mahfouz Mohamed, Mohamed Ibrahim Hassan, Mohamed Ezzat Elserafy, Moustafa Mahmoud Emad","doi":"10.7417/CT.2026.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication (NF) remains the gold standard anti-reflux procedure due to its well-established long-term efficacy and safety. However, the modified Nissen fundoplication (MNF) which incorporates additional sutures to fixate the esophagus to the right and left crus aims to enhance hiatal stabilization and potentially reduce GERD symptom recurrence.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to compare between conventional Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplicalion and Modified Nissen Fundoplication regarding post-operative complications specially \"Dysphagia, recurrence of GERD symptoms\".</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study is a prospective randomized controlled trial. The study took place at Ain Shams University Hospitals. The study was conducted from January 2023 to January 2025, including one year for patient recruitment and one year for follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study compared NF and MNF in terms of postoperative complications, revealing a statistically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative hiccups and left shoulder pain. While some prior studies found no significant differences between the two techniques, our results suggest that MNF can be performed safely by experienced surgeons without increased morbidity or complication rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study was constrained by its limited sample size and follow-up duration, which may affect the generalizability of findings. To further validate these results, future research should involve larger cohorts and extended follow-up periods to assess long-term recurrence rates and complications. Such data will help determine whether MNF offers superior outcomes over conventional NF, guiding clinical decision-making for optimal surgical management of GERD.</p>","PeriodicalId":50686,"journal":{"name":"Clinica Terapeutica","volume":"177 3","pages":"432-438"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica Terapeutica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7417/CT.2026.2025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication (NF) remains the gold standard anti-reflux procedure due to its well-established long-term efficacy and safety. However, the modified Nissen fundoplication (MNF) which incorporates additional sutures to fixate the esophagus to the right and left crus aims to enhance hiatal stabilization and potentially reduce GERD symptom recurrence.

Aim: This study aims to compare between conventional Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplicalion and Modified Nissen Fundoplication regarding post-operative complications specially "Dysphagia, recurrence of GERD symptoms".

Patients and methods: This study is a prospective randomized controlled trial. The study took place at Ain Shams University Hospitals. The study was conducted from January 2023 to January 2025, including one year for patient recruitment and one year for follow-up.

Results: This study compared NF and MNF in terms of postoperative complications, revealing a statistically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative hiccups and left shoulder pain. While some prior studies found no significant differences between the two techniques, our results suggest that MNF can be performed safely by experienced surgeons without increased morbidity or complication rates.

Conclusion: The current study was constrained by its limited sample size and follow-up duration, which may affect the generalizability of findings. To further validate these results, future research should involve larger cohorts and extended follow-up periods to assess long-term recurrence rates and complications. Such data will help determine whether MNF offers superior outcomes over conventional NF, guiding clinical decision-making for optimal surgical management of GERD.

传统腹腔镜尼森基金与改良尼森基金的比较研究:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
背景:腹腔镜尼森底扩术(NF)仍然是抗反流手术的金标准,因为它具有良好的长期疗效和安全性。然而,改良的Nissen底复制(MNF)采用额外的缝合线将食管固定在左右小腿,旨在增强食管裂孔稳定,并有可能减少胃食管反流症状的复发。目的:比较传统腹腔镜尼森底术与改良尼森底术在术后并发症特别是“吞咽困难、返流症状”方面的差异。患者和方法:本研究为前瞻性随机对照试验。这项研究在艾因沙姆斯大学医院进行。研究于2023年1月至2025年1月进行,包括1年的患者招募和1年的随访。结果:本研究比较了NF和MNF在术后并发症方面的差异,术后打嗝和左肩疼痛的发生率有统计学意义。虽然先前的一些研究发现两种技术之间没有显著差异,但我们的研究结果表明,经验丰富的外科医生可以安全地进行MNF,而不会增加发病率或并发症发生率。结论:本研究样本量和随访时间有限,可能影响研究结果的普遍性。为了进一步验证这些结果,未来的研究应该包括更大的队列和延长的随访期,以评估长期复发率和并发症。这些数据将有助于确定MNF是否比传统NF提供更好的结果,指导临床决策最佳手术治疗GERD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinica Terapeutica
Clinica Terapeutica PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: La Clinica Terapeutica è una rivista di Clinica e Terapia in Medicina e Chirurgia, fondata nel 1951 dal Prof. Mariano Messini (1901-1980), Direttore dell''Istituto di Idrologia Medica dell''Università di Roma “La Sapienza”. La rivista è pubblicata come “periodico bimestrale” dalla Società Editrice Universo, casa editrice fondata nel 1945 dal Comm. Luigi Pellino. La Clinica Terapeutica è indicizzata su MEDLINE, INDEX MEDICUS, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书