Trust at the intersections: black women's strategies for navigating bias, identity, and self-advocacy in health care.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q1 ETHNIC STUDIES
Toluwani E Adekunle, Tiwaladeoluwa B Adekunle, Ifeanyichukwu Anthony Ogueji, Uchechukwu Mercy Ejike, May Maloba
{"title":"Trust at the intersections: black women's strategies for navigating bias, identity, and self-advocacy in health care.","authors":"Toluwani E Adekunle, Tiwaladeoluwa B Adekunle, Ifeanyichukwu Anthony Ogueji, Uchechukwu Mercy Ejike, May Maloba","doi":"10.1080/13557858.2026.2663556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Black women in the United States continue to experience inequitable preventive health care shaped by racism, gender discrimination, and medical mistrust. While prior research has examined historical foundations of mistrust or individual attitudes, less attention has focused on how Black women interpret and navigate bias as it unfolds in everyday clinical encounters.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine how Black women understand their health care interactions, how they experience bias in preventive care, and the strategies they use to protect their well-being and sustain engagement in care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen self-identified Black women, including both U.S. born and immigrant participants aged 21-65 years, completed in-depth semi structured interviews between February and April 2023. Interviews explored participants' interpretations of clinical interactions, perceptions of being unheard or dismissed, and the responses they enacted to preserve their dignity and health. A thematic analytic approach guided the interpretation of the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three major themes emerged: (1) participants described biased encounters ranging from subtle dismissive cues to overt discrimination connected to race, gender, class, immigration, and religion; (2) these experiences carried emotional and psychological demands, contributing to constant self-monitoring during care; and (3) women employed strategies such as modifying their behavior, selectively choosing providers, and self-advocacy, while acknowledging the personal limits and emotional toll of continually having to protect themselves in clinical spaces. These findings illustrate how mistrust is not only historically rooted but continually reinforced through routine interactions that communicate who is valued within health care systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Black women's accounts demonstrate that mistrust emerges from lived experiences within health care, not only historical memory. Improving preventive care requires meaningful change in provider communication, institutional responsiveness to bias, and system level commitments that demonstrate trustworthiness. Strengthening trust will depend on whether health systems can consistently honor Black women's dignity, voice, and safety in care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51038,"journal":{"name":"Ethnicity & Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnicity & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2026.2663556","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Black women in the United States continue to experience inequitable preventive health care shaped by racism, gender discrimination, and medical mistrust. While prior research has examined historical foundations of mistrust or individual attitudes, less attention has focused on how Black women interpret and navigate bias as it unfolds in everyday clinical encounters.

Objective: To examine how Black women understand their health care interactions, how they experience bias in preventive care, and the strategies they use to protect their well-being and sustain engagement in care.

Methods: Seventeen self-identified Black women, including both U.S. born and immigrant participants aged 21-65 years, completed in-depth semi structured interviews between February and April 2023. Interviews explored participants' interpretations of clinical interactions, perceptions of being unheard or dismissed, and the responses they enacted to preserve their dignity and health. A thematic analytic approach guided the interpretation of the data.

Results: Three major themes emerged: (1) participants described biased encounters ranging from subtle dismissive cues to overt discrimination connected to race, gender, class, immigration, and religion; (2) these experiences carried emotional and psychological demands, contributing to constant self-monitoring during care; and (3) women employed strategies such as modifying their behavior, selectively choosing providers, and self-advocacy, while acknowledging the personal limits and emotional toll of continually having to protect themselves in clinical spaces. These findings illustrate how mistrust is not only historically rooted but continually reinforced through routine interactions that communicate who is valued within health care systems.

Conclusions: Black women's accounts demonstrate that mistrust emerges from lived experiences within health care, not only historical memory. Improving preventive care requires meaningful change in provider communication, institutional responsiveness to bias, and system level commitments that demonstrate trustworthiness. Strengthening trust will depend on whether health systems can consistently honor Black women's dignity, voice, and safety in care.

交叉路口的信任:黑人女性在医疗保健中导航偏见、身份和自我倡导的策略。
背景:由于种族主义、性别歧视和医疗不信任,美国黑人妇女继续经历着不公平的预防保健。虽然之前的研究已经研究了不信任或个人态度的历史基础,但很少有人关注黑人女性在日常临床接触中如何解释和应对偏见。目的:研究黑人妇女如何理解她们的医疗保健互动,她们如何在预防保健中经历偏见,以及她们用来保护自己的福祉和维持护理参与的策略。方法:17名自认为是黑人的女性,包括21-65岁的美国出生和移民,于2023年2月至4月完成了深度半结构化访谈。访谈探讨了参与者对临床互动的解释,对被忽视或被忽视的看法,以及他们为维护自己的尊严和健康而做出的反应。数据的解释以专题分析方法为指导。结果表明:(1)参与者描述了从微妙的轻蔑暗示到与种族、性别、阶级、移民和宗教有关的公开歧视的偏见遭遇;(2)这些体验带有情感和心理需求,有助于在护理过程中不断进行自我监控;(3)女性采取的策略包括改变自己的行为、选择性地选择医疗服务提供者和自我辩护,同时承认在临床空间中不断保护自己的个人局限性和情感代价。这些发现表明,不信任不仅是历史根源,而且通过日常互动不断加强,沟通卫生保健系统中谁是受重视的。结论:黑人妇女的描述表明,不信任来自于医疗保健领域的生活经历,而不仅仅是历史记忆。改善预防保健需要在提供者沟通、机构对偏见的反应和系统级承诺方面做出有意义的改变,以证明其可信赖性。加强信任将取决于卫生系统是否能够一贯尊重黑人妇女的尊严、发言权和护理安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethnicity & Health
Ethnicity & Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ethnicity & Health is an international academic journal designed to meet the world-wide interest in the health of ethnic groups. It embraces original papers from the full range of disciplines concerned with investigating the relationship between ’ethnicity’ and ’health’ (including medicine and nursing, public health, epidemiology, social sciences, population sciences, and statistics). The journal also covers issues of culture, religion, gender, class, migration, lifestyle and racism, in so far as they relate to health and its anthropological and social aspects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书