Test-Retest Reliability of the Triangle Completion Test.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Nathan Gabriel Sattah, Erin E Hernon, Courtney D Hall, Erin G Piker, Kristal Riska
{"title":"Test-Retest Reliability of the Triangle Completion Test.","authors":"Nathan Gabriel Sattah, Erin E Hernon, Courtney D Hall, Erin G Piker, Kristal Riska","doi":"10.3766/jaaa.250055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The triangle completion test (TCT) is a clinical measure of spatial navigation that has been associated with vestibular function. There are limited data on its statistical reliability.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the test-retest reliability of the TCT.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>Test-retest study of prospectively recruited participants.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Participants aged 60 years or older with no falls within the last 12 months and no history of vestibular dysfunction were recruited. Twenty participants were included, with a mean (standard deviation) age of 69.2 (6.25) years. Participants were equally divided among male and female participants (50.0 percent) and were predominantly White (80.0 percent).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Patients walked right triangles with leg lengths 1 meter (m) by 2 m by 2.23 m. Participants walked four triangles in the test trial (Trial One) and four triangles in the retest trial (Trial Two) without visual or auditory cues.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Endpoint error and angular deviation were measured for each triangle. Participants were retested three hours later. Test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and absolute reliability was assessed using the minimal detectable change (MDC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Trial One, participants had a mean endpoint error of 80.5 (53.4) centimeters (cm) and a mean angular deviation of 12.5 (4.82) degrees. In Trial Two, participants had a mean endpoint error of 64.4 (23.6) cm and a mean angular deviation of 14.4 (6.91) degrees. Endpoint error had poor reliability (ICC 0.05, 95 percent confidence interval [CI]: -1.41, 0.62), whereas angular deviation had fair reliability (ICC 0.72, 95 percent CI: 0.28, 0.89). The endpoint error had an MDC of 144.7 cm, and the angular deviation had an MDC of 7.13 degrees.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TCT angular deviation shows promise for good reliability, whereas endpoint error showed poor reliability. Further refinements to the TCT are needed to improve clinical feasibility and reliability.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>These results call into question the feasibility and reliability of the TCT and highlight the need for protocol standardization and optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":50021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","volume":"37 2","pages":"108-115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13105856/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.250055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The triangle completion test (TCT) is a clinical measure of spatial navigation that has been associated with vestibular function. There are limited data on its statistical reliability.

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the test-retest reliability of the TCT.

Research design: Test-retest study of prospectively recruited participants.

Study sample: Participants aged 60 years or older with no falls within the last 12 months and no history of vestibular dysfunction were recruited. Twenty participants were included, with a mean (standard deviation) age of 69.2 (6.25) years. Participants were equally divided among male and female participants (50.0 percent) and were predominantly White (80.0 percent).

Intervention: Patients walked right triangles with leg lengths 1 meter (m) by 2 m by 2.23 m. Participants walked four triangles in the test trial (Trial One) and four triangles in the retest trial (Trial Two) without visual or auditory cues.

Data collection and analysis: Endpoint error and angular deviation were measured for each triangle. Participants were retested three hours later. Test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and absolute reliability was assessed using the minimal detectable change (MDC).

Results: In Trial One, participants had a mean endpoint error of 80.5 (53.4) centimeters (cm) and a mean angular deviation of 12.5 (4.82) degrees. In Trial Two, participants had a mean endpoint error of 64.4 (23.6) cm and a mean angular deviation of 14.4 (6.91) degrees. Endpoint error had poor reliability (ICC 0.05, 95 percent confidence interval [CI]: -1.41, 0.62), whereas angular deviation had fair reliability (ICC 0.72, 95 percent CI: 0.28, 0.89). The endpoint error had an MDC of 144.7 cm, and the angular deviation had an MDC of 7.13 degrees.

Conclusions: TCT angular deviation shows promise for good reliability, whereas endpoint error showed poor reliability. Further refinements to the TCT are needed to improve clinical feasibility and reliability.

Clinical relevance statement: These results call into question the feasibility and reliability of the TCT and highlight the need for protocol standardization and optimization.

测试-重测三角完成测验的信度。
背景:三角完成测试(TCT)是一种与前庭功能相关的空间导航的临床测量方法。关于其统计可靠性的数据有限。目的:本研究旨在评估TCT的重测信度。研究设计:对前瞻性招募的参与者进行复试研究。研究样本:年龄在60岁或以上,在过去12个月内没有跌倒,没有前庭功能障碍史的参与者被招募。20名参与者被纳入,平均(标准差)年龄为69.2(6.25)岁。参与者男女比例相等(50.0%),主要是白人(80.0%)。干预:患者以腿长1米× 2米× 2.23米的直角三角形行走。在没有视觉或听觉提示的情况下,参与者在测试试验(试验一)和再测试试验(试验二)中分别走了四个三角形。数据收集和分析:测量每个三角形的端点误差和角偏差。参与者在三小时后再次接受测试。使用类内相关系数(ICC)评估重测信度,使用最小可检测变化(MDC)评估绝对信度。结果:在试验一中,参与者的平均终点误差为80.5(53.4)厘米(cm),平均角偏差为12.5(4.82)度。在试验二中,参与者的平均终点误差为64.4 (23.6)cm,平均角偏差为14.4(6.91)度。终点误差具有较差的信度(ICC 0.05, 95%可信区间[CI]: -1.41, 0.62),而角偏差具有较好的信度(ICC 0.72, 95% CI: 0.28, 0.89)。端点误差为144.7 cm,角偏差为7.13°。结论:TCT角度偏差具有良好的可靠性,而终点误差具有较差的可靠性。需要进一步改进TCT以提高临床可行性和可靠性。临床相关性声明:这些结果对TCT的可行性和可靠性提出了质疑,并强调了方案标准化和优化的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) is the Academy''s scholarly peer-reviewed publication, issued 10 times per year and available to Academy members as a benefit of membership. The JAAA publishes articles and clinical reports in all areas of audiology, including audiological assessment, amplification, aural habilitation and rehabilitation, auditory electrophysiology, vestibular assessment, and hearing science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书