Evidence Synthesis and Open Science: A Tutorial for Systematic Reviews and Beyond in Audiology Research.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Rachel Keiko Stark, Laura Gaeta
{"title":"Evidence Synthesis and Open Science: A Tutorial for Systematic Reviews and Beyond in Audiology Research.","authors":"Rachel Keiko Stark, Laura Gaeta","doi":"10.3766/jaaa.250020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence synthesis refers to a reproducible literature review that addresses a structured research question with a critical analysis of the results from a comprehensive literature search such as what is seen in systematic reviews, scoping reviews, and meta-analyses. Evidence synthesis publications have become more common, but their quality has not increased. However, with an increased understanding of how to produce a high-quality evidence synthesis, this issue can be addressed. Adherence to the open science principles of transparency, collaboration, reproducibility, and accessibility can help increase the quality of evidence synthesis.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This tutorial provides step-by-step instructions regarding how to produce a high-quality evidence synthesis project following best practices for evidence synthesis and open science principles.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>Tutorial.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>This tutorial is a step-by-step guide of how to apply current evidence synthesis standards to knowledge synthesis projects that will contribute to audiology research. Information regarding open access and how the principles of open science contribute to the quality and reproducibility of evidence synthesis is provided.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Widely applicable steps for high-quality evidence synthesis research are presented with information about how open science principles can be applied to the evidence synthesis process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By incorporating open science principles in the production of evidence synthesis, published research will be of higher quality and improve access to critical information for evidence-based practice. Professionals can produce high-quality research by understanding the appropriate steps for an evidence synthesis project, choosing the appropriate method for a structured research question, and utilizing the recognized international standards for the production of systematic reviews and other types of evidence synthesis.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>This tutorial introduces readers to evidence synthesis with step-by-step guidance and resources for clinician and researcher teams to create high-quality research while following best practices for evidence synthesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","volume":"37 2","pages":"144-152"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13105853/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.250020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence synthesis refers to a reproducible literature review that addresses a structured research question with a critical analysis of the results from a comprehensive literature search such as what is seen in systematic reviews, scoping reviews, and meta-analyses. Evidence synthesis publications have become more common, but their quality has not increased. However, with an increased understanding of how to produce a high-quality evidence synthesis, this issue can be addressed. Adherence to the open science principles of transparency, collaboration, reproducibility, and accessibility can help increase the quality of evidence synthesis.

Purpose: This tutorial provides step-by-step instructions regarding how to produce a high-quality evidence synthesis project following best practices for evidence synthesis and open science principles.

Research design: Tutorial.

Data collection and analysis: This tutorial is a step-by-step guide of how to apply current evidence synthesis standards to knowledge synthesis projects that will contribute to audiology research. Information regarding open access and how the principles of open science contribute to the quality and reproducibility of evidence synthesis is provided.

Results: Widely applicable steps for high-quality evidence synthesis research are presented with information about how open science principles can be applied to the evidence synthesis process.

Conclusions: By incorporating open science principles in the production of evidence synthesis, published research will be of higher quality and improve access to critical information for evidence-based practice. Professionals can produce high-quality research by understanding the appropriate steps for an evidence synthesis project, choosing the appropriate method for a structured research question, and utilizing the recognized international standards for the production of systematic reviews and other types of evidence synthesis.

Clinical relevance statement: This tutorial introduces readers to evidence synthesis with step-by-step guidance and resources for clinician and researcher teams to create high-quality research while following best practices for evidence synthesis.

证据综合与开放科学:听力学研究系统综述及后续指南。
背景:证据综合是指可重复的文献综述,通过对综合文献检索(如系统综述、范围综述和荟萃分析)的结果进行批判性分析来解决结构化研究问题。证据合成出版物已经变得越来越普遍,但它们的质量并没有提高。然而,随着对如何产生高质量证据合成的理解的增加,这个问题可以得到解决。坚持透明、协作、可重复性和可及性的开放科学原则有助于提高证据合成的质量。目的:本教程提供了关于如何按照证据合成的最佳实践和开放科学原则制作高质量证据合成项目的逐步指导。研究设计:教程。数据收集和分析:本教程一步一步地指导如何将当前的证据合成标准应用于有助于听力学研究的知识合成项目。提供了有关开放获取以及开放科学原则如何有助于证据合成的质量和可重复性的信息。结果:介绍了高质量证据合成研究的广泛适用步骤,以及如何将开放科学原则应用于证据合成过程的信息。结论:通过将开放科学原则纳入证据合成的生产,已发表的研究将具有更高的质量,并改善对循证实践关键信息的获取。专业人员可以通过理解证据综合项目的适当步骤,为结构化研究问题选择适当的方法,并利用公认的国际标准来进行系统评价和其他类型的证据综合,从而产生高质量的研究。临床相关性声明:本教程向读者介绍了证据合成的逐步指导和资源,供临床医生和研究人员团队创建高质量的研究,同时遵循证据合成的最佳实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) is the Academy''s scholarly peer-reviewed publication, issued 10 times per year and available to Academy members as a benefit of membership. The JAAA publishes articles and clinical reports in all areas of audiology, including audiological assessment, amplification, aural habilitation and rehabilitation, auditory electrophysiology, vestibular assessment, and hearing science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书