From axon to mind: Letters of a comparative neuroanatomist and a neurophysiologist.

IF 0.5 3区 哲学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Brendan P Lucey
{"title":"From axon to mind: Letters of a comparative neuroanatomist and a neurophysiologist.","authors":"Brendan P Lucey","doi":"10.1080/0964704X.2026.2656189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Systematic efforts to localize brain functions began in the nineteenth century through comparative neurological studies and clinicopathological correlations. By the early-twentieth century, investigations into the microstructure of cortical tissue enabled further subdivision of the cortex into distinct regions, laying the foundation for correlating anatomical structure with function. Advances in neurophysiology-such as the discovery of reflexes, synaptic transmission, and the development of electroencephalography-revealed that neurons operate in organized circuits rather than independently. However, the link between brain structure and consciousness remained elusive. Between 1950 and 1956, C. Judson Herrick, a comparative neuroanatomist, and George Bishop, a neurophysiologist, explored this question through correspondence. Herrick analyzed how increasing structural complexity between species corresponded with more complex behavior. Bishop, known for his work with Joseph Erlanger and Herbert Gasser on nerve action potentials, advanced the understanding of nerve fiber function. Together, Herrick and Bishop explored the role of older, more primitive brain structures in facilitating higher functions and emphasized the interconnectedness and integration of brain regions. Although their exchange did not resolve how brain structure results in complex behaviors, their dialogue highlighted the importance of evolutionary and comparative perspectives in understanding brain function.</p>","PeriodicalId":49997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the History of the Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the History of the Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0964704X.2026.2656189","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Systematic efforts to localize brain functions began in the nineteenth century through comparative neurological studies and clinicopathological correlations. By the early-twentieth century, investigations into the microstructure of cortical tissue enabled further subdivision of the cortex into distinct regions, laying the foundation for correlating anatomical structure with function. Advances in neurophysiology-such as the discovery of reflexes, synaptic transmission, and the development of electroencephalography-revealed that neurons operate in organized circuits rather than independently. However, the link between brain structure and consciousness remained elusive. Between 1950 and 1956, C. Judson Herrick, a comparative neuroanatomist, and George Bishop, a neurophysiologist, explored this question through correspondence. Herrick analyzed how increasing structural complexity between species corresponded with more complex behavior. Bishop, known for his work with Joseph Erlanger and Herbert Gasser on nerve action potentials, advanced the understanding of nerve fiber function. Together, Herrick and Bishop explored the role of older, more primitive brain structures in facilitating higher functions and emphasized the interconnectedness and integration of brain regions. Although their exchange did not resolve how brain structure results in complex behaviors, their dialogue highlighted the importance of evolutionary and comparative perspectives in understanding brain function.

从轴突到心灵:一位比较神经解剖学家和一位神经生理学家的书信。
通过比较神经学研究和临床病理相关性,对脑功能定位的系统努力始于19世纪。到20世纪初,对皮层组织微观结构的研究使皮层进一步细分为不同的区域,为将解剖结构与功能联系起来奠定了基础。神经生理学的进步,如反射、突触传递的发现和脑电图的发展,揭示了神经元在有组织的回路中运作,而不是独立运作。然而,大脑结构和意识之间的联系仍然难以捉摸。1950年至1956年间,比较神经解剖学家C.贾德森·赫里克(C. Judson Herrick)和神经生理学家乔治·毕晓普(George Bishop)通过通信探讨了这个问题。赫里克分析了物种间结构复杂性的增加如何与更复杂的行为相对应。毕晓普与约瑟夫·厄兰格和赫伯特·加塞尔在神经动作电位方面的工作而闻名,他推进了对神经纤维功能的理解。赫里克和毕晓普共同探索了更古老、更原始的大脑结构在促进高级功能方面的作用,并强调了大脑区域的相互联系和整合。虽然他们的交流并没有解决大脑结构是如何导致复杂行为的,但他们的对话强调了进化和比较观点在理解大脑功能方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the History of the Neurosciences
Journal of the History of the Neurosciences 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the History of the Neurosciences is the leading communication platform dealing with the historical roots of the basic and applied neurosciences. Its domains cover historical perspectives and developments, including biographical studies, disorders, institutions, documents, and instrumentation in neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropsychology, and the behavioral neurosciences. The history of ideas, changes in society and medicine, and the connections with other disciplines (e.g., the arts, philosophy, psychology) are welcome. In addition to original, full-length papers, the journal welcomes informative short communications, letters to the editors, book reviews, and contributions to its NeuroWords and Neurognostics columns. All manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by an Editor, and, if found suitable for further consideration, full- and short-length papers are subject to peer review (double blind, if requested) by at least 2 anonymous referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书