{"title":"From axon to mind: Letters of a comparative neuroanatomist and a neurophysiologist.","authors":"Brendan P Lucey","doi":"10.1080/0964704X.2026.2656189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Systematic efforts to localize brain functions began in the nineteenth century through comparative neurological studies and clinicopathological correlations. By the early-twentieth century, investigations into the microstructure of cortical tissue enabled further subdivision of the cortex into distinct regions, laying the foundation for correlating anatomical structure with function. Advances in neurophysiology-such as the discovery of reflexes, synaptic transmission, and the development of electroencephalography-revealed that neurons operate in organized circuits rather than independently. However, the link between brain structure and consciousness remained elusive. Between 1950 and 1956, C. Judson Herrick, a comparative neuroanatomist, and George Bishop, a neurophysiologist, explored this question through correspondence. Herrick analyzed how increasing structural complexity between species corresponded with more complex behavior. Bishop, known for his work with Joseph Erlanger and Herbert Gasser on nerve action potentials, advanced the understanding of nerve fiber function. Together, Herrick and Bishop explored the role of older, more primitive brain structures in facilitating higher functions and emphasized the interconnectedness and integration of brain regions. Although their exchange did not resolve how brain structure results in complex behaviors, their dialogue highlighted the importance of evolutionary and comparative perspectives in understanding brain function.</p>","PeriodicalId":49997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the History of the Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the History of the Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0964704X.2026.2656189","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Systematic efforts to localize brain functions began in the nineteenth century through comparative neurological studies and clinicopathological correlations. By the early-twentieth century, investigations into the microstructure of cortical tissue enabled further subdivision of the cortex into distinct regions, laying the foundation for correlating anatomical structure with function. Advances in neurophysiology-such as the discovery of reflexes, synaptic transmission, and the development of electroencephalography-revealed that neurons operate in organized circuits rather than independently. However, the link between brain structure and consciousness remained elusive. Between 1950 and 1956, C. Judson Herrick, a comparative neuroanatomist, and George Bishop, a neurophysiologist, explored this question through correspondence. Herrick analyzed how increasing structural complexity between species corresponded with more complex behavior. Bishop, known for his work with Joseph Erlanger and Herbert Gasser on nerve action potentials, advanced the understanding of nerve fiber function. Together, Herrick and Bishop explored the role of older, more primitive brain structures in facilitating higher functions and emphasized the interconnectedness and integration of brain regions. Although their exchange did not resolve how brain structure results in complex behaviors, their dialogue highlighted the importance of evolutionary and comparative perspectives in understanding brain function.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the History of the Neurosciences is the leading communication platform dealing with the historical roots of the basic and applied neurosciences. Its domains cover historical perspectives and developments, including biographical studies, disorders, institutions, documents, and instrumentation in neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropsychology, and the behavioral neurosciences. The history of ideas, changes in society and medicine, and the connections with other disciplines (e.g., the arts, philosophy, psychology) are welcome. In addition to original, full-length papers, the journal welcomes informative short communications, letters to the editors, book reviews, and contributions to its NeuroWords and Neurognostics columns. All manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by an Editor, and, if found suitable for further consideration, full- and short-length papers are subject to peer review (double blind, if requested) by at least 2 anonymous referees.