The Rise, Fall, and Laser Resurrection of the "Snake Heart" Operation.

IF 0.4 3区 哲学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
David S Jones
{"title":"The Rise, Fall, and Laser Resurrection of the \"Snake Heart\" Operation.","authors":"David S Jones","doi":"10.1093/jhmas/jrag017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 1964 Bombay surgeon P.K. Sen proposed a new operation for coronary artery disease. His \"snake heart\" procedure (or \"transmyocardial acupuncture\") sought to restore a reptilian form of circulation to the human heart. Despite its peculiar therapeutic rationale and limited evidence of its efficacy, the operation was taken up by surgeons around the world. By 1970, however, it had been set aside, done in by critique and a new competitor. Sen's therapeutic concept was surprisingly revived a decade later, not because of a better rationale or convincing evidence of efficacy, but because of the advent of surgical lasers. This case study highlights important features of late-twentieth-century surgery. First, what are the sources of surgical innovation and inspiration? Second, how does science travel? Sen's ability to push his technique onto the world stage was made possible by a Cold War culture of international travel and surgical training. Third, how do doctors judge therapeutic efficacy? Surgeons accepted Sen's operation because of their expansive physiological imaginary and their willingness to consider diverse and subjective therapeutic outcomes. Fourth, what drives therapeutic enthusiasm? Surgeons revived Sen's technique not because of new faith in the procedure but because lasers allowed them to pursue his therapeutic mission with an alluring new tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":49998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhmas/jrag017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1964 Bombay surgeon P.K. Sen proposed a new operation for coronary artery disease. His "snake heart" procedure (or "transmyocardial acupuncture") sought to restore a reptilian form of circulation to the human heart. Despite its peculiar therapeutic rationale and limited evidence of its efficacy, the operation was taken up by surgeons around the world. By 1970, however, it had been set aside, done in by critique and a new competitor. Sen's therapeutic concept was surprisingly revived a decade later, not because of a better rationale or convincing evidence of efficacy, but because of the advent of surgical lasers. This case study highlights important features of late-twentieth-century surgery. First, what are the sources of surgical innovation and inspiration? Second, how does science travel? Sen's ability to push his technique onto the world stage was made possible by a Cold War culture of international travel and surgical training. Third, how do doctors judge therapeutic efficacy? Surgeons accepted Sen's operation because of their expansive physiological imaginary and their willingness to consider diverse and subjective therapeutic outcomes. Fourth, what drives therapeutic enthusiasm? Surgeons revived Sen's technique not because of new faith in the procedure but because lasers allowed them to pursue his therapeutic mission with an alluring new tool.

“蛇心”行动的兴起、衰落和激光复活。
1964年,孟买外科医生P.K. Sen提出了一种治疗冠状动脉疾病的新手术。他的“蛇心脏”手术(或“心肌穿刺”)试图恢复人类心脏的爬行动物形式的循环。尽管这种手术有其独特的治疗原理和有限的疗效证据,但全世界的外科医生都采用了这种手术。然而,到了1970年,它被搁置一边,被批评和一个新的竞争对手所取代。十年后,森的治疗概念出人意料地复活了,不是因为有更好的理论基础或令人信服的疗效证据,而是因为手术激光的出现。本案例研究突出了20世纪晚期外科手术的重要特征。首先,外科创新和灵感的来源是什么?第二,科学是如何传播的?森能够将自己的技术推向世界舞台,得益于冷战时期国际旅行和外科手术培训的文化。第三,医生如何判断治疗效果?外科医生接受Sen的手术是因为他们广阔的生理想象和他们愿意考虑多样化和主观的治疗结果。第四,是什么推动了治疗热情?外科医生恢复了森的技术,不是因为对这项手术有了新的信心,而是因为激光使他们能够用一种诱人的新工具来完成他的治疗任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences
Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 管理科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Started in 1946, the Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences is internationally recognized as one of the top publications in its field. The journal''s coverage is broad, publishing the latest original research on the written beginnings of medicine in all its aspects. When possible and appropriate, it focuses on what practitioners of the healing arts did or taught, and how their peers, as well as patients, received and interpreted their efforts. Subscribers include clinicians and hospital libraries, as well as academic and public historians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书