H Carrichon, V Favier, G Cammaroto, H Dos Santos, A de Vito, E Zancanella, M B Cahali, A Moniri, M Carrasco-Llatas, M Ravesloot, U Alkan, R C T Cheong, J R Lechien, A Maniaci, C O'Connor, F Salamanca, O Jacobowitz, D Abedipour, A Decotte, D Schmitt, P Lestang, L Yona, J Huth, P-L Bastier, X Dufour, N De Vries, J C Winck, E Olszewska, L Allali, Q Lisan, F Carsuzaa
{"title":"Definition of severity, management, and follow-up of isolated snoring in adults: An international consensus.","authors":"H Carrichon, V Favier, G Cammaroto, H Dos Santos, A de Vito, E Zancanella, M B Cahali, A Moniri, M Carrasco-Llatas, M Ravesloot, U Alkan, R C T Cheong, J R Lechien, A Maniaci, C O'Connor, F Salamanca, O Jacobowitz, D Abedipour, A Decotte, D Schmitt, P Lestang, L Yona, J Huth, P-L Bastier, X Dufour, N De Vries, J C Winck, E Olszewska, L Allali, Q Lisan, F Carsuzaa","doi":"10.1016/j.anorl.2026.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Isolated snoring (IS), defined by nocturnal upper airway vibration without apneas, remains a prevalent yet underrecognized condition lacking standardized definitions for severity and management. Despite its significant impact on bed partners' sleep quality and social life, no consensus exists on severity criteria or follow-up practices. This international Delphi consensus aimed to define IS severity, address the management of nasal comorbidity, and establish follow-up protocols to support personalized patient care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-round Delphi process was conducted from December 2024 to April 2025, involving 35 otolaryngology experts from 16 countries. Thirty-nine initial statements were developed by a steering committee and evaluated using a 9-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as≥75% agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 58 evaluated statements, 44 reached consensus. IS severity was associated with frequency of snoring, bed partner's complaints, and impact on the couple's quality of life, while objective acoustic parameters alone were not deemed reliable indicators. Nasal obstruction was recognized as a treatable comorbidity that may be assessed before snoring management. Personalized management using validated subjective tools was strongly recommended. For follow-up, expert consensus supported a 3- to 6-month reassessment using smartphone apps or quality-of-life metrics, with distinctions made between clinical and research goals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This consensus supports a patient- and partner-centered approach to IS. It discourages reliance on isolated acoustic data for severity grading, promotes proactive management of nasal factors, and highlights the need for individualized treatment strategies. Future research should aim to validate objective and subjective tools to further standardize care pathways for IS.</p>","PeriodicalId":48834,"journal":{"name":"European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2026.04.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Isolated snoring (IS), defined by nocturnal upper airway vibration without apneas, remains a prevalent yet underrecognized condition lacking standardized definitions for severity and management. Despite its significant impact on bed partners' sleep quality and social life, no consensus exists on severity criteria or follow-up practices. This international Delphi consensus aimed to define IS severity, address the management of nasal comorbidity, and establish follow-up protocols to support personalized patient care.
Methods: A two-round Delphi process was conducted from December 2024 to April 2025, involving 35 otolaryngology experts from 16 countries. Thirty-nine initial statements were developed by a steering committee and evaluated using a 9-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as≥75% agreement.
Results: Of 58 evaluated statements, 44 reached consensus. IS severity was associated with frequency of snoring, bed partner's complaints, and impact on the couple's quality of life, while objective acoustic parameters alone were not deemed reliable indicators. Nasal obstruction was recognized as a treatable comorbidity that may be assessed before snoring management. Personalized management using validated subjective tools was strongly recommended. For follow-up, expert consensus supported a 3- to 6-month reassessment using smartphone apps or quality-of-life metrics, with distinctions made between clinical and research goals.
Conclusion: This consensus supports a patient- and partner-centered approach to IS. It discourages reliance on isolated acoustic data for severity grading, promotes proactive management of nasal factors, and highlights the need for individualized treatment strategies. Future research should aim to validate objective and subjective tools to further standardize care pathways for IS.
期刊介绍:
European Annals of Oto-rhino-laryngology, Head and Neck diseases heir of one of the oldest otorhinolaryngology journals in Europe is the official organ of the French Society of Otorhinolaryngology (SFORL) and the the International Francophone Society of Otorhinolaryngology (SIFORL). Today six annual issues provide original peer reviewed clinical and research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches and review articles giving most up-to-date insights in all areas of otology, laryngology rhinology, head and neck surgery. The European Annals also publish the SFORL guidelines and recommendations.The journal is a unique two-armed publication: the European Annals (ANORL) is an English language well referenced online journal (e-only) whereas the Annales Françaises d’ORL (AFORL), mail-order paper and online edition in French language are aimed at the French-speaking community. French language teams must submit their articles in French to the AFORL site.
Federating journal in its field, the European Annals has an Editorial board of experts with international reputation that allow to make an important contribution to communication on new research data and clinical practice by publishing high-quality articles.