Definition of severity, management, and follow-up of isolated snoring in adults: An international consensus.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
H Carrichon, V Favier, G Cammaroto, H Dos Santos, A de Vito, E Zancanella, M B Cahali, A Moniri, M Carrasco-Llatas, M Ravesloot, U Alkan, R C T Cheong, J R Lechien, A Maniaci, C O'Connor, F Salamanca, O Jacobowitz, D Abedipour, A Decotte, D Schmitt, P Lestang, L Yona, J Huth, P-L Bastier, X Dufour, N De Vries, J C Winck, E Olszewska, L Allali, Q Lisan, F Carsuzaa
{"title":"Definition of severity, management, and follow-up of isolated snoring in adults: An international consensus.","authors":"H Carrichon, V Favier, G Cammaroto, H Dos Santos, A de Vito, E Zancanella, M B Cahali, A Moniri, M Carrasco-Llatas, M Ravesloot, U Alkan, R C T Cheong, J R Lechien, A Maniaci, C O'Connor, F Salamanca, O Jacobowitz, D Abedipour, A Decotte, D Schmitt, P Lestang, L Yona, J Huth, P-L Bastier, X Dufour, N De Vries, J C Winck, E Olszewska, L Allali, Q Lisan, F Carsuzaa","doi":"10.1016/j.anorl.2026.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Isolated snoring (IS), defined by nocturnal upper airway vibration without apneas, remains a prevalent yet underrecognized condition lacking standardized definitions for severity and management. Despite its significant impact on bed partners' sleep quality and social life, no consensus exists on severity criteria or follow-up practices. This international Delphi consensus aimed to define IS severity, address the management of nasal comorbidity, and establish follow-up protocols to support personalized patient care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-round Delphi process was conducted from December 2024 to April 2025, involving 35 otolaryngology experts from 16 countries. Thirty-nine initial statements were developed by a steering committee and evaluated using a 9-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as≥75% agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 58 evaluated statements, 44 reached consensus. IS severity was associated with frequency of snoring, bed partner's complaints, and impact on the couple's quality of life, while objective acoustic parameters alone were not deemed reliable indicators. Nasal obstruction was recognized as a treatable comorbidity that may be assessed before snoring management. Personalized management using validated subjective tools was strongly recommended. For follow-up, expert consensus supported a 3- to 6-month reassessment using smartphone apps or quality-of-life metrics, with distinctions made between clinical and research goals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This consensus supports a patient- and partner-centered approach to IS. It discourages reliance on isolated acoustic data for severity grading, promotes proactive management of nasal factors, and highlights the need for individualized treatment strategies. Future research should aim to validate objective and subjective tools to further standardize care pathways for IS.</p>","PeriodicalId":48834,"journal":{"name":"European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2026.04.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Isolated snoring (IS), defined by nocturnal upper airway vibration without apneas, remains a prevalent yet underrecognized condition lacking standardized definitions for severity and management. Despite its significant impact on bed partners' sleep quality and social life, no consensus exists on severity criteria or follow-up practices. This international Delphi consensus aimed to define IS severity, address the management of nasal comorbidity, and establish follow-up protocols to support personalized patient care.

Methods: A two-round Delphi process was conducted from December 2024 to April 2025, involving 35 otolaryngology experts from 16 countries. Thirty-nine initial statements were developed by a steering committee and evaluated using a 9-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as≥75% agreement.

Results: Of 58 evaluated statements, 44 reached consensus. IS severity was associated with frequency of snoring, bed partner's complaints, and impact on the couple's quality of life, while objective acoustic parameters alone were not deemed reliable indicators. Nasal obstruction was recognized as a treatable comorbidity that may be assessed before snoring management. Personalized management using validated subjective tools was strongly recommended. For follow-up, expert consensus supported a 3- to 6-month reassessment using smartphone apps or quality-of-life metrics, with distinctions made between clinical and research goals.

Conclusion: This consensus supports a patient- and partner-centered approach to IS. It discourages reliance on isolated acoustic data for severity grading, promotes proactive management of nasal factors, and highlights the need for individualized treatment strategies. Future research should aim to validate objective and subjective tools to further standardize care pathways for IS.

成人孤立性打鼾的严重程度、管理和随访的定义:国际共识。
孤立性打鼾(IS)是指夜间上呼吸道振动而无呼吸暂停,是一种普遍但未得到充分认识的疾病,缺乏对严重程度和管理的标准化定义。尽管它对床伴的睡眠质量和社交生活有重大影响,但在严重程度标准或后续措施方面尚无共识。这个国际德尔菲共识旨在定义IS的严重程度,解决鼻腔合并症的管理,并建立随访协议,以支持个性化的患者护理。方法:采用两轮德尔菲法,于2024年12月至2025年4月对来自16个国家的35名耳鼻喉科专家进行调查。指导委员会制定了39份初步陈述,并使用9分李克特量表进行评估。一致定义为≥75%的同意。结果:58项评价中,44项意见一致。IS的严重程度与打鼾的频率、床伴的抱怨以及对夫妻生活质量的影响有关,而客观的声学参数本身并不是可靠的指标。鼻阻塞被认为是一种可治疗的合并症,可以在打鼾治疗前进行评估。强烈建议使用经过验证的主观工具进行个性化管理。对于随访,专家一致支持使用智能手机应用程序或生活质量指标进行3至6个月的重新评估,并区分临床和研究目标。结论:这一共识支持以患者和合作伙伴为中心的IS治疗方法。它不鼓励依赖孤立的声学数据进行严重程度分级,促进鼻部因素的主动管理,并强调个性化治疗策略的必要性。未来的研究应旨在验证客观和主观工具,以进一步规范IS的护理途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
28.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
12 days
期刊介绍: European Annals of Oto-rhino-laryngology, Head and Neck diseases heir of one of the oldest otorhinolaryngology journals in Europe is the official organ of the French Society of Otorhinolaryngology (SFORL) and the the International Francophone Society of Otorhinolaryngology (SIFORL). Today six annual issues provide original peer reviewed clinical and research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches and review articles giving most up-to-date insights in all areas of otology, laryngology rhinology, head and neck surgery. The European Annals also publish the SFORL guidelines and recommendations.The journal is a unique two-armed publication: the European Annals (ANORL) is an English language well referenced online journal (e-only) whereas the Annales Françaises d’ORL (AFORL), mail-order paper and online edition in French language are aimed at the French-speaking community. French language teams must submit their articles in French to the AFORL site. Federating journal in its field, the European Annals has an Editorial board of experts with international reputation that allow to make an important contribution to communication on new research data and clinical practice by publishing high-quality articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书