João Felipe Leite Bonfitto, João Figueira Scarini, Iara Vieira Ferreira, Reydson Alcides de Lima-Souza, Erika Said Abu Egal, Albina Altemani, Fernanda Viviane Mariano
{"title":"Preliminary diagnostic criteria for distinguishing metaplastic Warthin tumors from mucoepidermoid carcinomas rich in lymphoid stroma.","authors":"João Felipe Leite Bonfitto, João Figueira Scarini, Iara Vieira Ferreira, Reydson Alcides de Lima-Souza, Erika Said Abu Egal, Albina Altemani, Fernanda Viviane Mariano","doi":"10.31744/einstein_journal/2026AO1591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the clinicopathological and immunohistochemical profiles of unconventional Warthin tumors and mucoepidermoid carcinomas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven low-grade salivary gland tumors with Warthin-like features were analyzed. Group A (n=6) showed a double-layered oncocytic epithelium in less than 50% of the epithelial cells, whereas Group B (n=5) lacked this feature. Additionally, five conventional Warthin tumors and ten conventional mucoepidermoid carcinomas were analyzed as reference groups. Immunohistochemical staining was performed for cytokeratins (types 5/6, 7, and 14), p63, mitochondrial antigens, and Ki-67. Expression patterns were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group A exhibited an oncocytic epithelium arranged in a double-layered pattern, with mitochondrial antigens strongly staining the luminal oncocytic cells. Cytokeratin 7 expression in Warthin tumors was predominantly luminal. In contrast, Group B showed glandular and cystic structures with diffuse mitochondrial antigen and cytokeratin 7 positivity. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed significant differences, with Warthin tumors showing distinct double-layered epithelial structures, and mucoepidermoid carcinomas displaying diffuse staining patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Distinct immunohistochemical profiles, including mitochondrial antigen and cytokeratin 7 expression, along with morphological differences, support the classification of Group A as metaplastic Warthin tumors and Group B as Warthin-like variants of mucoepidermoid carcinoma. These findings highlight the importance of molecular and immunohistochemical analyses for accurate classification of these tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":47359,"journal":{"name":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","volume":"24 ","pages":"eAO1591"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13128232/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2026AO1591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to analyze the clinicopathological and immunohistochemical profiles of unconventional Warthin tumors and mucoepidermoid carcinomas.
Methods: Eleven low-grade salivary gland tumors with Warthin-like features were analyzed. Group A (n=6) showed a double-layered oncocytic epithelium in less than 50% of the epithelial cells, whereas Group B (n=5) lacked this feature. Additionally, five conventional Warthin tumors and ten conventional mucoepidermoid carcinomas were analyzed as reference groups. Immunohistochemical staining was performed for cytokeratins (types 5/6, 7, and 14), p63, mitochondrial antigens, and Ki-67. Expression patterns were compared between groups.
Results: Group A exhibited an oncocytic epithelium arranged in a double-layered pattern, with mitochondrial antigens strongly staining the luminal oncocytic cells. Cytokeratin 7 expression in Warthin tumors was predominantly luminal. In contrast, Group B showed glandular and cystic structures with diffuse mitochondrial antigen and cytokeratin 7 positivity. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed significant differences, with Warthin tumors showing distinct double-layered epithelial structures, and mucoepidermoid carcinomas displaying diffuse staining patterns.
Conclusion: Distinct immunohistochemical profiles, including mitochondrial antigen and cytokeratin 7 expression, along with morphological differences, support the classification of Group A as metaplastic Warthin tumors and Group B as Warthin-like variants of mucoepidermoid carcinoma. These findings highlight the importance of molecular and immunohistochemical analyses for accurate classification of these tumors.