Developing consensus on competency-based educational standards in orthopaedic manual physical therapy fellowship training: findings from a modified Delphi part 4: systems-based practice and patient management.

IF 1.9 Q2 REHABILITATION
Megan Donaldson, Jennifer Bent, Kyle Covington, Chad E Cook, Ina Diener, Mareli Klopper, John Magel, Amy McDevitt, Bryan O'Halloran, Emilio Puentedura, Pierre Röscher, Chris Showalter, Moyo Tillery, Damian Keter
{"title":"Developing consensus on competency-based educational standards in orthopaedic manual physical therapy fellowship training: findings from a modified Delphi part 4: systems-based practice and patient management.","authors":"Megan Donaldson, Jennifer Bent, Kyle Covington, Chad E Cook, Ina Diener, Mareli Klopper, John Magel, Amy McDevitt, Bryan O'Halloran, Emilio Puentedura, Pierre Röscher, Chris Showalter, Moyo Tillery, Damian Keter","doi":"10.1080/10669817.2026.2662609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Competency-based education (CBE) emphasizes mastery of defined competencies rather than time-based progression. Within orthopedic manual physical therapy (OMPT), the evolving evidence supports person-centered, evidence-informed care, requiring fellowship training standards that reflect this shift. Among the seven proposed domains of competence, Systems-Based Practice (SBP) and Patient Management (PM) are essential. SBP focuses on navigating healthcare systems, interprofessional collaboration, and advocacy, while PM emphasizes delivering comprehensive, value-based care through evidence-informed, person-centered approaches. Consensus on competencies for these domains in OMPT fellowship training remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To achieve an international consensus on competencies and graduation milestones for OMPT fellowship training in SBP and PM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified three-Round Delphi study was conducted. In Round I, nine content experts drafted competencies and milestones. Rounds II and III invited stakeholders from the International Federation of Manual and Musculoskeletal Physical Therapists (IFOMPT) member organizations via web-based surveys. Consensus was defined <i>a priori</i> as ≥ 80% agreement. Descriptive statistics and composite scores were used to assess the strength of agreement. The reporting in this study follows guidelines from the Accurate Consensus Reporting Document (ACCORD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><i>Systems-Based Practice (SBP)</i>: Five competencies and 19 milestoneswere proposed; four competencies achieved consensus (health screening, healtheducation, healthcare system navigation, health policy and advocacy). <i>PatientManagement (PM)</i>: Six competencies and 17 milestones achieved consensus,with the strongest support for evidence-informed treatment implementation,person-centered care, cultural and social sensitivity, and outcomeoptimization. Lesser support was observed for applying the human movementsystem framework.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findingsunderscore the importance of competencies that promote leadership, advocacy,and evidence-informed, person-centered care in OMPT fellowship training. Gapsin consensus regarding quality improvement and the application of movementsystems highlight areas for future study or development. These resultscontribute to a global framework for advanced OMPT fellowship-level education.</p>","PeriodicalId":47319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2026.2662609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Competency-based education (CBE) emphasizes mastery of defined competencies rather than time-based progression. Within orthopedic manual physical therapy (OMPT), the evolving evidence supports person-centered, evidence-informed care, requiring fellowship training standards that reflect this shift. Among the seven proposed domains of competence, Systems-Based Practice (SBP) and Patient Management (PM) are essential. SBP focuses on navigating healthcare systems, interprofessional collaboration, and advocacy, while PM emphasizes delivering comprehensive, value-based care through evidence-informed, person-centered approaches. Consensus on competencies for these domains in OMPT fellowship training remains unclear.

Objective: To achieve an international consensus on competencies and graduation milestones for OMPT fellowship training in SBP and PM.

Methods: A modified three-Round Delphi study was conducted. In Round I, nine content experts drafted competencies and milestones. Rounds II and III invited stakeholders from the International Federation of Manual and Musculoskeletal Physical Therapists (IFOMPT) member organizations via web-based surveys. Consensus was defined a priori as ≥ 80% agreement. Descriptive statistics and composite scores were used to assess the strength of agreement. The reporting in this study follows guidelines from the Accurate Consensus Reporting Document (ACCORD).

Results: Systems-Based Practice (SBP): Five competencies and 19 milestoneswere proposed; four competencies achieved consensus (health screening, healtheducation, healthcare system navigation, health policy and advocacy). PatientManagement (PM): Six competencies and 17 milestones achieved consensus,with the strongest support for evidence-informed treatment implementation,person-centered care, cultural and social sensitivity, and outcomeoptimization. Lesser support was observed for applying the human movementsystem framework.

Conclusions: Findingsunderscore the importance of competencies that promote leadership, advocacy,and evidence-informed, person-centered care in OMPT fellowship training. Gapsin consensus regarding quality improvement and the application of movementsystems highlight areas for future study or development. These resultscontribute to a global framework for advanced OMPT fellowship-level education.

在以能力为基础的骨科手工物理治疗奖学金培训的教育标准上达成共识:来自修改的德尔菲第4部分的发现:基于系统的实践和患者管理。
背景:能力为基础的教育(CBE)强调掌握定义的能力,而不是基于时间的进步。在骨科手工物理治疗(OMPT)中,不断发展的证据支持以人为中心的循证护理,要求奖学金培训标准反映这一转变。在七个提出的能力领域中,基于系统的实践(SBP)和患者管理(PM)是必不可少的。SBP侧重于引导医疗保健系统、跨专业合作和宣传,而PM强调通过循证、以人为本的方法提供全面的、基于价值的护理。关于OMPT研究金培训中这些领域的能力的共识仍然不清楚。目标:在SBP和PM的OMPT奖学金培训的能力和毕业里程碑方面达成国际共识。方法:采用改良的三轮德尔菲法。在第一轮中,九位内容专家起草了能力和里程碑。第二轮和第三轮通过网络调查邀请了国际手工和肌肉骨骼物理治疗师联合会(IFOMPT)成员组织的利益相关者。共识被先验地定义为≥80%的一致性。使用描述性统计和综合评分来评估一致性的强度。本研究的报告遵循准确共识报告文件(ACCORD)的指导方针。结果:基于系统的实践(SBP):提出了5个能力和19个里程碑;四项能力达成共识(健康筛查、健康教育、卫生保健系统导航、卫生政策和宣传)。患者管理(PM): 6项能力和17个里程碑达成共识,在循证治疗实施、以人为本的护理、文化和社会敏感性以及结果优化方面得到了最有力的支持。较少的支持观察到应用人体运动系统框架。结论:研究结果强调了在OMPT奖学金培训中促进领导、倡导和循证、以人为本的护理能力的重要性。关于质量改进和运动系统应用的共识突出了未来研究或发展的领域。这些结果有助于建立先进的OMPT研究金级别教育的全球框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research, case reports, and reviews of the literature that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of manual therapy, clinical research, therapeutic practice, and academic training. In addition, each issue features an editorial written by the editor or a guest editor, media reviews, thesis reviews, and abstracts of current literature. Areas of interest include: •Thrust and non-thrust manipulation •Neurodynamic assessment and treatment •Diagnostic accuracy and classification •Manual therapy-related interventions •Clinical decision-making processes •Understanding clinimetrics for the clinician
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书