{"title":"Feasibility of transthoracic echocardiography in the prone position with a low-cost adaptation: morphological, functional, and hemodynamic analysis.","authors":"Nilson Bossle Conci, Nathalia Conci Santorio, Pandreli Testa Santorio, Juliana Cassiano Lemos, Fábio Fernandes, Viviane Tiemi Hotta","doi":"10.31744/einstein_journal/2026AO1802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Transthoracic echocardiography is essential for hemodynamic assessment in critically ill patients; however, its use in the prone position remains challenging. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of performing transthoracic echocardiography using a low-cost ultrasound table adaptation in the prone position.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, cross-sectional, comparative pilot study. Anthropometric and clinical data were collected along with echocardiographic image acquisition in the conventional and prone positions by the same operator. Feasibility was assessed by the acquisition of echocardiographic windows and the number of key variables in both positions. Comparative analyses were conducted for image quality, examination duration, and quantitative parameters such as variables related to systemic congestion, biventricular function, and cardiac output estimation. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Fisher's exact test, binomial test, and false discovery rate correction for multiple comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Echocardiographic views were obtained for all patients in both positions. Imaging in the prone position allowed consistent acquisition of 16 of 17 key variables, with no significant difference. Image quality in the parasternal view was slightly reduced in the prone position but remained appropriate (p=0.015). Examinations in the prone position were on average 4.2 min longer (p=0.037). No significant differences were observed between the positions for any quantitative echocardiographic parameters, including chamber dimensions, systolic and diastolic function, cardiac output, and inferior vena cava assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transthoracic echocardiography in the prone position was feasible, with measurements comparable to those in the conventional position in healthy individuals undergoing routine evaluations in a regular echocardiography laboratory. Further studies are required to validate the accuracy and applicability of this method, particularly for patients in intensive care and emergency settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47359,"journal":{"name":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","volume":"24 ","pages":"eAO1802"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13128249/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2026AO1802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Transthoracic echocardiography is essential for hemodynamic assessment in critically ill patients; however, its use in the prone position remains challenging. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of performing transthoracic echocardiography using a low-cost ultrasound table adaptation in the prone position.
Methods: This was a single-center, cross-sectional, comparative pilot study. Anthropometric and clinical data were collected along with echocardiographic image acquisition in the conventional and prone positions by the same operator. Feasibility was assessed by the acquisition of echocardiographic windows and the number of key variables in both positions. Comparative analyses were conducted for image quality, examination duration, and quantitative parameters such as variables related to systemic congestion, biventricular function, and cardiac output estimation. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Fisher's exact test, binomial test, and false discovery rate correction for multiple comparisons.
Results: Echocardiographic views were obtained for all patients in both positions. Imaging in the prone position allowed consistent acquisition of 16 of 17 key variables, with no significant difference. Image quality in the parasternal view was slightly reduced in the prone position but remained appropriate (p=0.015). Examinations in the prone position were on average 4.2 min longer (p=0.037). No significant differences were observed between the positions for any quantitative echocardiographic parameters, including chamber dimensions, systolic and diastolic function, cardiac output, and inferior vena cava assessment.
Conclusion: Transthoracic echocardiography in the prone position was feasible, with measurements comparable to those in the conventional position in healthy individuals undergoing routine evaluations in a regular echocardiography laboratory. Further studies are required to validate the accuracy and applicability of this method, particularly for patients in intensive care and emergency settings.
目的:经胸超声心动图在危重患者血流动力学评估中具有重要意义;然而,它在俯卧位置的使用仍然具有挑战性。本研究旨在评估采用低成本的俯卧位超声台进行经胸超声心动图的可行性。方法:这是一项单中心、横断面、比较的初步研究。人体测量和临床数据收集与超声心动图图像采集在常规和俯卧位由同一操作员。通过超声心动图窗口的获取和两个位置的关键变量的数量来评估可行性。对比分析了图像质量、检查时间和定量参数,如与全身充血、双心室功能和心输出量估计相关的变量。统计分析采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验、Fisher精确检验、二项检验和多重比较的错误发现率校正。结果:两种体位均获得超声心动图。俯卧位成像可以一致地获取17个关键变量中的16个,没有显著差异。俯卧位胸骨旁位的图像质量略有下降,但仍保持正常(p=0.015)。俯卧位检查时间平均延长4.2 min (p=0.037)。任何定量超声心动图参数,包括腔室尺寸、收缩和舒张功能、心输出量和下腔静脉评估,在不同位置之间均无显著差异。结论:俯卧位经胸超声心动图是可行的,在常规超声心动图实验室进行常规评估的健康人,其测量结果与常规体位相当。需要进一步的研究来验证这种方法的准确性和适用性,特别是对重症监护和紧急情况下的患者。