Partisan Divergence in Fertility Change Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Florida.

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Population Research and Policy Review Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-15 DOI:10.1007/s11113-025-09972-0
Heather M Rackin, Christina M Gibson-Davis, Courtney E Williams, Dustin Hughes, Seunghwan Yoo
{"title":"Partisan Divergence in Fertility Change Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Florida.","authors":"Heather M Rackin, Christina M Gibson-Davis, Courtney E Williams, Dustin Hughes, Seunghwan Yoo","doi":"10.1007/s11113-025-09972-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Motivated by political-based differences in pandemic perceptions, this study analyzed whether Republican- and Democratic-leaning counties exhibited differential fertility shifts, leading to a partisan fertility gap. As COVID-19 emerged, the political right dismissed the threat of the virus, while the political left emphasized it as a major crisis. These contrasting views may have led to diverging fertility responses between those living in Democratic- and Republican-leaning areas. Using county-level data from Florida, difference-in-difference models predicted quarterly change in fertility rates between 2018 and 2022. Models estimated the partisan fertility gap (e.g., Republican-Democratic difference in fertility rate changes relative to before the pandemic) as a function of 2020 Trump vote share. The partisan fertility gap widened during the pandemic's early months, as fertility in Republican-leaning counties declined less than in Democratic-leaning counties. This gap was only observed for White women and was robust to controlling on time-varying potential confounders (unemployment rate and racial composition changes). The partisan gap was short-lived, however. Results suggest that politically-charged contexts where would-be-parents lived may have affected pandemic-induced fertility shocks and demonstrates the need to understand fertility changes in the context of the broader political environment-a vital endeavor given record-low fertility and unprecedented political polarization in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":47633,"journal":{"name":"Population Research and Policy Review","volume":"44 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13105308/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Research and Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-025-09972-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Motivated by political-based differences in pandemic perceptions, this study analyzed whether Republican- and Democratic-leaning counties exhibited differential fertility shifts, leading to a partisan fertility gap. As COVID-19 emerged, the political right dismissed the threat of the virus, while the political left emphasized it as a major crisis. These contrasting views may have led to diverging fertility responses between those living in Democratic- and Republican-leaning areas. Using county-level data from Florida, difference-in-difference models predicted quarterly change in fertility rates between 2018 and 2022. Models estimated the partisan fertility gap (e.g., Republican-Democratic difference in fertility rate changes relative to before the pandemic) as a function of 2020 Trump vote share. The partisan fertility gap widened during the pandemic's early months, as fertility in Republican-leaning counties declined less than in Democratic-leaning counties. This gap was only observed for White women and was robust to controlling on time-varying potential confounders (unemployment rate and racial composition changes). The partisan gap was short-lived, however. Results suggest that politically-charged contexts where would-be-parents lived may have affected pandemic-induced fertility shocks and demonstrates the need to understand fertility changes in the context of the broader political environment-a vital endeavor given record-low fertility and unprecedented political polarization in the United States.

佛罗里达州COVID-19大流行之前和期间生育率变化的党派分歧。
由于对流行病的看法存在政治上的差异,这项研究分析了倾向共和党和民主党的县是否表现出不同的生育率变化,从而导致党派生育率差距。随着新冠病毒的出现,政治右翼对病毒的威胁不屑一顾,而政治左翼则强调这是一场重大危机。这些截然不同的观点可能导致生活在民主党和共和党倾向地区的人对生育率的反应出现分歧。利用佛罗里达州的县级数据,差分模型预测了2018年至2022年期间生育率的季度变化。模型估计了党派生育率差距(例如,共和党和民主党在生育率变化方面相对于大流行前的差异)是2020年特朗普投票份额的函数。在疫情爆发的最初几个月,党派间的生育率差距扩大了,因为倾向共和党的县的生育率下降幅度小于倾向民主党的县。这一差距仅在白人女性中观察到,并且在控制随时间变化的潜在混杂因素(失业率和种族构成变化)方面是稳健的。然而,党派分歧是短暂的。研究结果表明,准父母生活的政治环境可能影响了流行病引发的生育率冲击,并表明有必要在更广泛的政治环境背景下了解生育率的变化——鉴于美国创纪录的低生育率和前所未有的政治两极分化,这是一项至关重要的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Now accepted in JSTOR! Population Research and Policy Review has a twofold goal: it provides a convenient source for government officials and scholars in which they can learn about the policy implications of recent research relevant to the causes and consequences of changing population size and composition; and it provides a broad, interdisciplinary coverage of population research. Population Research and Policy Review seeks to publish quality material of interest to professionals working in the fields of population, and those fields which intersect and overlap with population studies. The publication includes demographic, economic, social, political and health research papers and related contributions which are based on either the direct scientific evaluation of particular policies or programs, or general contributions intended to advance knowledge that informs policy and program development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书