Extended High-Frequency Audiometry Outcomes in Generation Z With Electronic Noise Exposure.

IF 1.4 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Journal of Audiology and Otology Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-20 DOI:10.7874/jao.2025.00640
Merve Mutlu Çekim, Doğukan Özdemir, Esra Yılmaz, Samet Aydemir, Hande Arslan, Dursun Mehmet Mehel, Ayşe Çeçen
{"title":"Extended High-Frequency Audiometry Outcomes in Generation Z With Electronic Noise Exposure.","authors":"Merve Mutlu Çekim, Doğukan Özdemir, Esra Yılmaz, Samet Aydemir, Hande Arslan, Dursun Mehmet Mehel, Ayşe Çeçen","doi":"10.7874/jao.2025.00640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Exposure to recreational and electronic noise sources increases the risk of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) in pediatric and young adult populations-frequently referred to as Generation Z. Extended high-frequency audiometry (EHFA) is commonly used for the early detection and prognostication of NIHL. Here, we used EHFA to evaluate the potential hearing loss associated with the use of technological devices in Generation Z individuals.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional, descriptive investigation. Individuals aged 10-22 years who presented to our clinic with any complaint between January 15, 2023, and January 15, 2024 and who were scheduled for routine hearing assessment were included. All participants underwent conventional audiometry covering conventional frequencies (CFs) as well as EHFA. Participants were divided into two groups based on weekly use of personal listening devices (PLDs): less than 10 h/week and 10 h/week or more. Differences between the groups were analyzed with respect to CFs and extended high frequencies (EHFs), as well as the presence of vertigo, tinnitus, and subjective hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding the presence of symptoms, vertigo, tinnitus, or hearing loss (p=0.47, p=0.75, p=0.10, and p=0.99, respectively). No significant differences were observed in the average CFs between the right and left ears (p=0.53 and p=0.38, respectively). In the right ear at 10 kHz, the mean threshold for participants using PLDs less than 10 h/week was 7.50±7.70, compared to 5.0±10.88 for those using PLDs 10 h or more per week (p=0.02). For all other frequencies, average thresholds in both ears were higher in participants with weekly PLDs ≥10 h compared to those with <10 h, although these differences were not statistically significant (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EHFs tended to be higher in individuals using PLDs for ≥10 h/week, although the differences were not statistically significant at most frequencies. A significant difference was observed only at 10 kHz in the right ear; however, this may reflect interindividual variability rather than a consistent exposure effect. This study is the first in which NIHL in Generation Z was the focus, and replication in larger cohorts is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":44886,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Audiology and Otology","volume":"30 2","pages":"114-118"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13129884/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Audiology and Otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7874/jao.2025.00640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Exposure to recreational and electronic noise sources increases the risk of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) in pediatric and young adult populations-frequently referred to as Generation Z. Extended high-frequency audiometry (EHFA) is commonly used for the early detection and prognostication of NIHL. Here, we used EHFA to evaluate the potential hearing loss associated with the use of technological devices in Generation Z individuals.

Subjects and methods: This was a cross-sectional, descriptive investigation. Individuals aged 10-22 years who presented to our clinic with any complaint between January 15, 2023, and January 15, 2024 and who were scheduled for routine hearing assessment were included. All participants underwent conventional audiometry covering conventional frequencies (CFs) as well as EHFA. Participants were divided into two groups based on weekly use of personal listening devices (PLDs): less than 10 h/week and 10 h/week or more. Differences between the groups were analyzed with respect to CFs and extended high frequencies (EHFs), as well as the presence of vertigo, tinnitus, and subjective hearing loss.

Results: No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding the presence of symptoms, vertigo, tinnitus, or hearing loss (p=0.47, p=0.75, p=0.10, and p=0.99, respectively). No significant differences were observed in the average CFs between the right and left ears (p=0.53 and p=0.38, respectively). In the right ear at 10 kHz, the mean threshold for participants using PLDs less than 10 h/week was 7.50±7.70, compared to 5.0±10.88 for those using PLDs 10 h or more per week (p=0.02). For all other frequencies, average thresholds in both ears were higher in participants with weekly PLDs ≥10 h compared to those with <10 h, although these differences were not statistically significant (p>0.05).

Conclusions: EHFs tended to be higher in individuals using PLDs for ≥10 h/week, although the differences were not statistically significant at most frequencies. A significant difference was observed only at 10 kHz in the right ear; however, this may reflect interindividual variability rather than a consistent exposure effect. This study is the first in which NIHL in Generation Z was the focus, and replication in larger cohorts is warranted.

电子噪声暴露下的Z代扩展高频测听结果。
背景和目的:暴露于娱乐和电子噪声源会增加儿童和年轻成人人群(通常被称为z世代)患噪声性听力损失(NIHL)的风险。扩展高频听力学(EHFA)通常用于NIHL的早期检测和预测。在这里,我们使用EHFA来评估Z世代个体中与使用技术设备相关的潜在听力损失。对象和方法:这是一项横断面描述性调查。纳入了在2023年1月15日至2024年1月15日期间到我们诊所就诊的年龄在10-22岁的患者,他们有任何投诉,并计划进行常规听力评估。所有参与者都进行了常规听力测量,包括常规频率(CFs)和EHFA。参与者根据每周使用个人听力设备(pld)的情况分为两组:少于10小时/周和10小时/周或更多。分析两组之间的差异,包括CFs和延长高频(EHFs),以及眩晕、耳鸣和主观听力损失的存在。结果:两组之间在症状、眩晕、耳鸣或听力损失方面无显著差异(p=0.47, p=0.75, p=0.10和p=0.99)。右耳和左耳的平均CFs差异无统计学意义(p=0.53和p=0.38)。在10 kHz的右耳中,使用pld少于10小时/周的参与者的平均阈值为7.50±7.70,而每周使用pld 10小时或更多的参与者的平均阈值为5.0±10.88 (p=0.02)。对于所有其他频率,与0.05相比,每周PLDs≥10小时的参与者双耳平均阈值更高。结论:在使用pld≥10小时/周的个体中,EHFs往往更高,尽管在大多数频率上差异无统计学意义。仅在右耳10 kHz时观察到显著差异;然而,这可能反映了个体间的差异,而不是一致的暴露效应。这项研究是第一次将Z世代的NIHL作为重点,并且有必要在更大的队列中进行复制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Audiology and Otology
Journal of Audiology and Otology OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Journal of Audiology and Otology (JAO) (formerly known as Korean Journal of Audiology) aims to publish the most advanced findings for all aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear using state-of-the-art techniques and analyses. The journal covers recent trends related to the topics of audiology, otology, and neurotology conducted by professionals, with the goal of providing better possible treatment to people of all ages, from infants to the elderly, who suffer from auditory and/or vestibular disorders and thus, improving their quality of life. This journal encourages the submission of review papers about current professional issues, research papers presenting a scientific base and clinical application, and case papers with unique reports or clinical trials. We also invite letters to the editor and papers related to the manufacture and distribution of medical devices. This journal provides integrated views from otologists, audiologists, and other healthcare practitioners, offering readers high quality scientific and clinical information. This peer-reviewed and open access journal has been the official journal of the Korean Audiological Society since 1997 and of both the Korean Audiological Society and the Korean Otological Society since 2017. It is published in English four times a year in January, April, July, and October.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书