The BPPV-SQ: Development and Clinical Evaluation of a Brief Screening Questionnaire for Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo.

IF 1.7 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Giacinto Asprella-Libonati, Fernanda Asprella-Libonati, Marco Familiari, Vito Rizzi, Camilla Gallipoli, Margherita Laguardia, Giuseppe Gagliardi, Anna Guida, Giuseppe Lapacciana, Luca Colella, Giada Cavallaro
{"title":"The BPPV-SQ: Development and Clinical Evaluation of a Brief Screening Questionnaire for Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo.","authors":"Giacinto Asprella-Libonati, Fernanda Asprella-Libonati, Marco Familiari, Vito Rizzi, Camilla Gallipoli, Margherita Laguardia, Giuseppe Gagliardi, Anna Guida, Giuseppe Lapacciana, Luca Colella, Giada Cavallaro","doi":"10.3390/audiolres16020058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is the most common cause of peripheral vertigo and is diagnosed clinically, yet many patients initially present in primary care. Early identification may optimize referral and management. <b>Objective</b>: To perform a pilot Phase 1 validation of the Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo Screening Questionnaire (BPPV-SQ), a brief screening questionnaire designed for future use in general practice (primary care settings where patients are initially evaluated by general practitioners), assessing its ability to identify BPPV, suggest canal involvement, and support progression to Phase 2 validation. <b>Methods</b>: In this prospective observational study, 108 patients with positional vertigo and no neurological signs were evaluated in a specialist setting. The 7-item dichotomous questionnaire (score 0-3 for diagnostic core) was administered prior to bedside examination, which served as the reference standard. <b>Results</b>: Higher questionnaire scores were associated with an increased probability of confirmed BPPV. Among patients with the maximum score of 3, BPPV was confirmed in 73.5% of cases, with a lateralization concordance of 69.4% between questionnaire responses and specialist diagnosis. In contrast, lower scores (0-1) were associated with a markedly lower rate of confirmed BPPV (14.3%). <b>Conclusions</b>: In this pilot Phase 1 validation, the BPPV-SQ demonstrated score-dependent diagnostic reliability and acceptable lateralization agreement in high-score patients, supporting progression to Phase 2 validation in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":44133,"journal":{"name":"Audiology Research","volume":"16 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13113622/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres16020058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is the most common cause of peripheral vertigo and is diagnosed clinically, yet many patients initially present in primary care. Early identification may optimize referral and management. Objective: To perform a pilot Phase 1 validation of the Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo Screening Questionnaire (BPPV-SQ), a brief screening questionnaire designed for future use in general practice (primary care settings where patients are initially evaluated by general practitioners), assessing its ability to identify BPPV, suggest canal involvement, and support progression to Phase 2 validation. Methods: In this prospective observational study, 108 patients with positional vertigo and no neurological signs were evaluated in a specialist setting. The 7-item dichotomous questionnaire (score 0-3 for diagnostic core) was administered prior to bedside examination, which served as the reference standard. Results: Higher questionnaire scores were associated with an increased probability of confirmed BPPV. Among patients with the maximum score of 3, BPPV was confirmed in 73.5% of cases, with a lateralization concordance of 69.4% between questionnaire responses and specialist diagnosis. In contrast, lower scores (0-1) were associated with a markedly lower rate of confirmed BPPV (14.3%). Conclusions: In this pilot Phase 1 validation, the BPPV-SQ demonstrated score-dependent diagnostic reliability and acceptable lateralization agreement in high-score patients, supporting progression to Phase 2 validation in primary care.

BPPV-SQ:良性阵发性体位性眩晕简短筛查问卷的开发和临床评价。
背景:良性阵发性体位性眩晕(BPPV)是周围性眩晕最常见的病因,临床诊断,但许多患者最初出现在初级保健。早期识别可以优化转诊和管理。目的:对良性阵发性体位性眩晕筛查问卷(BPPV- sq)进行1期试验验证,这是一份简短的筛查问卷,旨在将来用于全科医生(初级保健机构,患者最初由全科医生评估),评估其识别BPPV的能力,建议椎管受诊,并支持进展到2期验证。方法:在这项前瞻性观察研究中,108例无神经症状的体位性眩晕患者在专科机构进行评估。床边检查前采用7项二分法问卷(诊断核心得分0-3分)作为参考标准。结果:问卷得分越高,确诊BPPV的可能性越高。在最高得分为3分的患者中,73.5%的患者确诊为BPPV,问卷回答与专科诊断的侧方一致性为69.4%。相比之下,较低的评分(0-1)与较低的BPPV确诊率(14.3%)相关。结论:在这个试验性的1期验证中,BPPV-SQ在高分患者中表现出依赖于评分的诊断可靠性和可接受的侧化一致性,支持在初级保健中进行2期验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Audiology Research
Audiology Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
56
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Audiology Research is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant scientific researches related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear that can be used by clinicians, scientists and specialists to improve understanding and treatment of patients with audiological and neurotological disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书