Bruna de Franceschi Schirmer Gindri, Tainara Milbradt Weich Wagner, Ana Cláudia Figueiredo Frizzo, Eliara Pinto Vieira Biaggio
{"title":"Behavioral and electrophysiological findings of central auditory processing in children and adolescents undergoing musical training.","authors":"Bruna de Franceschi Schirmer Gindri, Tainara Milbradt Weich Wagner, Ana Cláudia Figueiredo Frizzo, Eliara Pinto Vieira Biaggio","doi":"10.1590/2317-1782/e20240318en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study analyzes the outcomes of behavioral and electrophysiological assessments of central auditory processing in children and adolescents undergoing musical training through clinical protocols or structured educational methods.</p><p><strong>Research strategies: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in three electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus) between April and June 2024. Two researchers independently applied the following search terms combined with the Boolean operator \"AND\": \"musical training,\" \"child,\" and \"adolescent.\"</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>The PICOS framework guided the selection process, focusing on population (children and adolescents), intervention (musical training), comparison (with non-trained groups), outcome (central auditory processing effects), and study design (cohort, case-control, and randomized clinical trials).</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>Data were extracted and tabulated by the researchers and analyzed descriptively. Methodological quality was assessed using the NHLBI Quality Assessment Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 800 initial publications, five duplicates were removed. Of the remaining 795 studies, 783 did not meet the inclusion criteria. A full-text review of 12 studies led to the exclusion of one due to unavailability and four due to quality issues. Ultimately, seven articles were included.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results highlight improvements in sound discrimination, speech-in-noise processing, environmental sound change detection, and selective attention. These findings underscore the necessity of avoiding overly brief training programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":46547,"journal":{"name":"CoDAS","volume":"38 3","pages":"e20240318"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13143034/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CoDAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/e20240318en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study analyzes the outcomes of behavioral and electrophysiological assessments of central auditory processing in children and adolescents undergoing musical training through clinical protocols or structured educational methods.
Research strategies: A systematic search was conducted in three electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus) between April and June 2024. Two researchers independently applied the following search terms combined with the Boolean operator "AND": "musical training," "child," and "adolescent."
Selection criteria: The PICOS framework guided the selection process, focusing on population (children and adolescents), intervention (musical training), comparison (with non-trained groups), outcome (central auditory processing effects), and study design (cohort, case-control, and randomized clinical trials).
Data analysis: Data were extracted and tabulated by the researchers and analyzed descriptively. Methodological quality was assessed using the NHLBI Quality Assessment Tool.
Results: Among 800 initial publications, five duplicates were removed. Of the remaining 795 studies, 783 did not meet the inclusion criteria. A full-text review of 12 studies led to the exclusion of one due to unavailability and four due to quality issues. Ultimately, seven articles were included.
Conclusion: The results highlight improvements in sound discrimination, speech-in-noise processing, environmental sound change detection, and selective attention. These findings underscore the necessity of avoiding overly brief training programs.
目的:本研究分析儿童和青少年在接受音乐训练后,通过临床实验和结构化教育方法对中枢听觉加工的行为和电生理评估结果。研究策略:在2024年4 - 6月间对PubMed、Web of Science和Scopus三个电子数据库进行了系统检索。两名研究人员独立应用了以下搜索词,并结合了布尔运算符“AND”:“音乐训练”、“儿童”和“青少年”。选择标准:PICOS框架指导了选择过程,重点关注人群(儿童和青少年)、干预(音乐训练)、比较(与非训练组)、结果(中枢听觉处理效果)和研究设计(队列、病例对照和随机临床试验)。数据分析:数据由研究人员提取并制表,并进行描述性分析。采用NHLBI质量评估工具评估方法学质量。结果:800篇首次发表文献中,删除了5篇重复文献。在剩余的795项研究中,783项不符合纳入标准。对12项研究的全文审查导致一项研究因无法获得而被排除,四项研究因质量问题而被排除。最终,纳入了七篇文章。结论:结果表明语音识别、语音噪声处理、环境声音变化检测和选择性注意等方面都有显著提高。这些发现强调了避免过于简短的训练计划的必要性。