Early Versus Late Pediatric Palliative Care in Oncology: A Systematic Review of Outcomes, Disparities, and Implementation Barriers : Palliative Care in Oncology.

IF 0.7 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Galen Medical Journal Pub Date : 2025-09-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.31661/gmj.v14i.4007
Fatemeh Rezaei, Homa Vejdani, Fatemeh Moslemi Najarcolaie, Zahra Gharibi, Rezvan Shirali, Atieh Okhli, Ainaz Esmi, Fatemeh Zahrasalamat, Arezoo Kordian
{"title":"Early Versus Late Pediatric Palliative Care in Oncology: A Systematic Review of Outcomes, Disparities, and Implementation Barriers : Palliative Care in Oncology.","authors":"Fatemeh Rezaei, Homa Vejdani, Fatemeh Moslemi Najarcolaie, Zahra Gharibi, Rezvan Shirali, Atieh Okhli, Ainaz Esmi, Fatemeh Zahrasalamat, Arezoo Kordian","doi":"10.31661/gmj.v14i.4007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review, conducted per PRISMA 2020 guidelines, synthesizes evidence on early pediatric palliative care (PPC) versus late or no PPC in children and young adults (0-21 years) with life-threatening oncologic illnesses. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, and grey literature (ProQuest, ClinicalTrials.gov) from inception to 1 August 2025 identified 12 studies, including retrospective cohorts, surveys, and one randomized controlled trial across the USA, Canada, Taiwan, and Spain. Early PPC, variably defined as initiation from diagnosis to 12 months before death, consistently reduced end-of-life care intensity (fewer ICU admissions, mechanical ventilation, invasive interventions), increased hospice enrollment, home deaths, and improved quality of life and symptom management compared to late or no PPC. Disparities were evident, with minority groups and patients with hematologic malignancies less likely to receive early PPC, compounded by barriers such as provider misconceptions, systemic limitations, and clinical trial enrollment delays. Outpatient and integrated home-hospital PPC models significantly lowered hospital-based end-of-life care, though robust late PPC programs could achieve comparable outcomes. Narrative synthesis using the GRADE approach highlighted moderate to high confidence in reduced care intensity and improved family outcomes with early PPC, despite heterogeneous definitions and study designs precluding meta-analysis. Findings show the need for standardized PPC protocols, education to address provider barriers, and policy reforms to enhance equitable access, particularly for underserved populations. While oncology evidence is robust, further randomized trials are needed to strengthen findings across other conditions, supporting early PPC integration to optimize patient and family outcomes in pediatric oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":44017,"journal":{"name":"Galen Medical Journal","volume":"14 ","pages":"e4007"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12569405/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Galen Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v14i.4007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review, conducted per PRISMA 2020 guidelines, synthesizes evidence on early pediatric palliative care (PPC) versus late or no PPC in children and young adults (0-21 years) with life-threatening oncologic illnesses. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, and grey literature (ProQuest, ClinicalTrials.gov) from inception to 1 August 2025 identified 12 studies, including retrospective cohorts, surveys, and one randomized controlled trial across the USA, Canada, Taiwan, and Spain. Early PPC, variably defined as initiation from diagnosis to 12 months before death, consistently reduced end-of-life care intensity (fewer ICU admissions, mechanical ventilation, invasive interventions), increased hospice enrollment, home deaths, and improved quality of life and symptom management compared to late or no PPC. Disparities were evident, with minority groups and patients with hematologic malignancies less likely to receive early PPC, compounded by barriers such as provider misconceptions, systemic limitations, and clinical trial enrollment delays. Outpatient and integrated home-hospital PPC models significantly lowered hospital-based end-of-life care, though robust late PPC programs could achieve comparable outcomes. Narrative synthesis using the GRADE approach highlighted moderate to high confidence in reduced care intensity and improved family outcomes with early PPC, despite heterogeneous definitions and study designs precluding meta-analysis. Findings show the need for standardized PPC protocols, education to address provider barriers, and policy reforms to enhance equitable access, particularly for underserved populations. While oncology evidence is robust, further randomized trials are needed to strengthen findings across other conditions, supporting early PPC integration to optimize patient and family outcomes in pediatric oncology.

肿瘤学的早期与晚期小儿姑息治疗:结果、差异和实施障碍的系统回顾:肿瘤学的姑息治疗。
本系统综述根据PRISMA 2020指南进行,综合了患有危及生命的肿瘤疾病的儿童和年轻人(0-21岁)早期儿科姑息治疗(PPC)与晚期或无PPC的证据。综合检索MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Central和灰色文献(ProQuest, ClinicalTrials.gov),从成立到2025年8月1日确定了12项研究,包括回顾性队列,调查和一项随机对照试验,横跨美国,加拿大,台湾和西班牙。与晚期或无PPC相比,早期PPC(从诊断开始到死亡前12个月)持续降低临终关怀强度(减少ICU住院、机械通气、侵入性干预)、增加临终关怀登记、家庭死亡、改善生活质量和症状管理。差异是明显的,少数群体和血液恶性肿瘤患者不太可能接受早期PPC,加上诸如提供者误解、系统限制和临床试验登记延迟等障碍。门诊和综合家庭医院PPC模式显著降低了以医院为基础的临终关怀,尽管强有力的晚期PPC项目可以达到类似的结果。尽管不同的定义和研究设计排除了荟萃分析,但使用GRADE方法的叙述性综合强调了早期PPC在降低护理强度和改善家庭结局方面的中等至高可信度。研究结果表明,需要制定标准化的PPC协议,开展教育以解决提供者的障碍,并进行政策改革以提高公平获取,特别是对服务不足的人群。虽然肿瘤学证据是可靠的,但需要进一步的随机试验来加强其他疾病的发现,支持早期PPC整合以优化儿科肿瘤学患者和家庭的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Galen Medical Journal
Galen Medical Journal MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: GMJ is open access, peer-reviewed journal in English and supported by Noncommunicable Diseases (NCD) Research Center of Fasa University of Medical Sciences that publishing by Salvia Medical Sciences Ltd. GMJ will consider all types of the following scientific papers for publication: - Editorial’s choice - Original Researches - Review articles - Case reports - Case series - Letter (to editors, to authors, etc) - Short communications - Medical Idea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书