Outcomes of Metastasectomy in Patients with Solitary Bone Metastases: Experience from a Cancer Center in Bogotá, Colombia.

Q3 Medicine
Gabriel Andrés Narváez Rodríguez, Andrea Juliana Hernández Caicedo, Juan Fernando Chaustre Flórez, Camilo Soto-Montoya, Andrea Franco-Betancur, Luis Carlos Gómez Mier
{"title":"Outcomes of Metastasectomy in Patients with Solitary Bone Metastases: Experience from a Cancer Center in Bogotá, Colombia.","authors":"Gabriel Andrés Narváez Rodríguez, Andrea Juliana Hernández Caicedo, Juan Fernando Chaustre Flórez, Camilo Soto-Montoya, Andrea Franco-Betancur, Luis Carlos Gómez Mier","doi":"10.1016/j.recot.2026.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Solitary bone metastases represent a major clinical challenge. Surgical metastasectomy remains a valid option in selected patients. This study evaluated the oncologic and functional outcomes following metastasectomy in a cancer referral center in Bogotá, Colombia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study including patients with solitary bone metastases who underwent metastasectomy between January 2004 and March 2024. Demographic, clinical, and surgical data were collected. Postoperative functionality was assessed using the MSTS score. Local recurrence, disease progression, and survival were analyzed with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used when appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients (73.3% female) were included, with a mean age of 60.4 ± 10.9 years. The most common primary tumors were renal (26.7%) and breast (16.7%). The predominant surgical technique was endoprosthetic reconstruction (50%). Postoperative complications occurred in 40% (12/30), mainly infections (41%). Among 13 patients with recorded functionality, the moderate MSTS category was most common (53.8%), with no significant associations found with the evaluated clinical or surgical variables (all p > 0.05). During follow-up, 19 patients (63%) developed metastatic progression, 2 (6.7%) developed local recurrence, and 11 (36.6%) remained progression-free. The overall survival rate at 12 months was 65%, with a median follow-up of 12 months (IQR: 12-36).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Metastasectomy in patients with solitary bone metastases appears to be a feasible and safe approach, associated with favorable functional outcomes and low rates of local recurrence in this cohort. Its role should be considered within a multidisciplinary context in carefully selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":39664,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2026.04.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Solitary bone metastases represent a major clinical challenge. Surgical metastasectomy remains a valid option in selected patients. This study evaluated the oncologic and functional outcomes following metastasectomy in a cancer referral center in Bogotá, Colombia.

Methods: A retrospective observational study including patients with solitary bone metastases who underwent metastasectomy between January 2004 and March 2024. Demographic, clinical, and surgical data were collected. Postoperative functionality was assessed using the MSTS score. Local recurrence, disease progression, and survival were analyzed with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used when appropriate.

Results: Thirty patients (73.3% female) were included, with a mean age of 60.4 ± 10.9 years. The most common primary tumors were renal (26.7%) and breast (16.7%). The predominant surgical technique was endoprosthetic reconstruction (50%). Postoperative complications occurred in 40% (12/30), mainly infections (41%). Among 13 patients with recorded functionality, the moderate MSTS category was most common (53.8%), with no significant associations found with the evaluated clinical or surgical variables (all p > 0.05). During follow-up, 19 patients (63%) developed metastatic progression, 2 (6.7%) developed local recurrence, and 11 (36.6%) remained progression-free. The overall survival rate at 12 months was 65%, with a median follow-up of 12 months (IQR: 12-36).

Conclusion: Metastasectomy in patients with solitary bone metastases appears to be a feasible and safe approach, associated with favorable functional outcomes and low rates of local recurrence in this cohort. Its role should be considered within a multidisciplinary context in carefully selected patients.

孤立性骨转移患者的转移瘤切除术的结果:来自哥伦比亚波哥大癌症中心的经验。
孤立性骨转移是一个重大的临床挑战。手术转移切除术仍然是一个有效的选择,在选定的患者。本研究评估了哥伦比亚波哥大癌症转诊中心转移瘤切除术后的肿瘤学和功能结果。方法:回顾性观察研究包括2004年1月至2024年3月间行转移瘤切除术的孤立性骨转移患者。收集了人口统计学、临床和手术数据。术后功能评估采用MSTS评分。在至少12个月的随访中分析局部复发、疾病进展和生存。适当时采用Kaplan-Meier检验和log-rank检验。结果:纳入30例患者,女性占73.3%,平均年龄60.4±10.9岁。最常见的原发肿瘤是肾脏(26.7%)和乳房(16.7%)。主要的手术技术是假体内重建(50%)。术后并发症发生率为40%(12/30),以感染为主(41%)。在13例有功能记录的患者中,中度MSTS类型最常见(53.8%),与评估的临床或手术变量无显著相关性(均p < 0.05)。随访期间,19例(63%)患者发生转移进展,2例(6.7%)发生局部复发,11例(36.6%)患者无进展。12个月的总生存率为65%,中位随访12个月(IQR: 12-36)。结论:转移性骨转移患者的转移性切除术似乎是一种可行且安全的方法,在该队列中具有良好的功能结局和低的局部复发率。它的作用应考虑在多学科背景下,仔细选择的病人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
156
审稿时长
51 weeks
期刊介绍: Es una magnífica revista para acceder a los mejores artículos de investigación en la especialidad y los casos clínicos de mayor interés. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad, y está incluida en prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书