{"title":"Shared Decision-Making in the Choice of Renal Replacement Therapy: A Comparative Text Mining Analysis of Physicians and Nurses.","authors":"Misa Iida, Sumiyo Nabeshima, Sayuri Kaneko, Yuji Kamijo, Toshio Kobayashi, Yukako Ando","doi":"10.3390/nursrep16040142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to compare factors facilitating shared decision-making (SDM) in renal replacement therapy decision support between physicians and nurses using text mining analysis. <b>Methods:</b> A web-based survey was conducted among 250 physicians and 299 nurses between December 2024 and March 2025. Free-text responses regarding factors facilitating SDM were collected and analyzed using quantitative text analysis. <b>Results:</b> Valid responses were obtained from 103 physicians and 122 nurses. Both groups identified six factors, with three shared conceptual domains across physicians and nurses, reflected in three physician factors and four nurse factors. Common domains included \"promoting patient and family understanding\", \"enhancing staff education\", and \"strengthening multidisciplinary collaboration\". Physicians emphasized structural and environmental factors, such as \"establishing clinical systems\", \"inter-institutional collaboration\", and \"securing sufficient time\". In contrast, nurses highlighted practical and interpersonal aspects, including \"understanding patients' values and lifestyles\", \"supporting patient-centered decision-making\", and \"promoting team-based information sharing\". <b>Conclusions:</b> Factors that facilitate SDM in renal replacement therapy include perspectives common to both physicians and nurses, as well as profession-specific perspectives. These findings suggest that integrating organizational support and clinical skills development is crucial for promoting SDM in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"16 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13119424/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep16040142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to compare factors facilitating shared decision-making (SDM) in renal replacement therapy decision support between physicians and nurses using text mining analysis. Methods: A web-based survey was conducted among 250 physicians and 299 nurses between December 2024 and March 2025. Free-text responses regarding factors facilitating SDM were collected and analyzed using quantitative text analysis. Results: Valid responses were obtained from 103 physicians and 122 nurses. Both groups identified six factors, with three shared conceptual domains across physicians and nurses, reflected in three physician factors and four nurse factors. Common domains included "promoting patient and family understanding", "enhancing staff education", and "strengthening multidisciplinary collaboration". Physicians emphasized structural and environmental factors, such as "establishing clinical systems", "inter-institutional collaboration", and "securing sufficient time". In contrast, nurses highlighted practical and interpersonal aspects, including "understanding patients' values and lifestyles", "supporting patient-centered decision-making", and "promoting team-based information sharing". Conclusions: Factors that facilitate SDM in renal replacement therapy include perspectives common to both physicians and nurses, as well as profession-specific perspectives. These findings suggest that integrating organizational support and clinical skills development is crucial for promoting SDM in clinical settings.
期刊介绍:
Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.