Zhenfeng Sun, Fuwen Yang, Xi Wang, Yin Sun, Suhan Zhang, Liangkun Ma
{"title":"Experiential Classes Plus Digital Logging in Antenatal Care for Pregnant Women in China: Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Zhenfeng Sun, Fuwen Yang, Xi Wang, Yin Sun, Suhan Zhang, Liangkun Ma","doi":"10.2196/84705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maternal health during the perinatal period is a global public health priority. While antenatal education is widely implemented, conventional lecture-based models often fail to achieve sustained behavior change. Innovative approaches that integrate experiential learning with digital support may enhance maternal knowledge, self-management, and pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a combined experiential class and online logging intervention for pregnant women in China and to explore the mechanisms underpinning its impact on health practices and service experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods design was used in a district-level maternal and child health hospital in Beijing. In the quantitative arm, 40 women (intervention group, n=20; control group, n=20) were enrolled in a quasi-experimental comparison. Outcomes included knowledge-attitude-practice indicators, service satisfaction, and clinical birth outcomes. Given the limited sample size, a qualitative arm was conducted to complement statistical findings: semistructured interviews with 20 women (10 per group) were analyzed thematically. Quantitative and qualitative results were integrated during interpretation to provide a comprehensive evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the experiential class alone, the combined intervention was associated with higher knowledge scores (mean difference 1.6 points, 95% CI 0.8-2.4), stronger adherence to recommended health practices (composite adherence score difference 1.0, 95% CI 0.4-1.6), and higher overall service satisfaction (mean difference 0.6, 95% CI 0.2-1.0). Across multiple domains, a higher proportion of participants in the intervention group met dietary, exercise, and supplementation recommendations. Clinical outcome differences were exploratory, as the study was not powered for these end points. Qualitative analysis revealed 3 mechanisms, such as empowerment and self-efficacy, practice and persistence, and systemic/environmental support, through which the intervention influenced experiences and practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The experiential class plus online logging model is feasible and acceptable in a real-world antenatal setting. Although limited by a small sample size, findings suggest that the intervention improves maternal knowledge, health practices, and service experiences and may inform future adequately powered trials to evaluate pregnancy outcomes. Qualitative insights highlight mechanisms of health practice change and provide contextual depth, underscoring the value of mixed methods designs in maternal health research.</p>","PeriodicalId":36208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","volume":"18 ","pages":"e84705"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13099118/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/84705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Maternal health during the perinatal period is a global public health priority. While antenatal education is widely implemented, conventional lecture-based models often fail to achieve sustained behavior change. Innovative approaches that integrate experiential learning with digital support may enhance maternal knowledge, self-management, and pregnancy outcomes.
Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a combined experiential class and online logging intervention for pregnant women in China and to explore the mechanisms underpinning its impact on health practices and service experiences.
Methods: A mixed methods design was used in a district-level maternal and child health hospital in Beijing. In the quantitative arm, 40 women (intervention group, n=20; control group, n=20) were enrolled in a quasi-experimental comparison. Outcomes included knowledge-attitude-practice indicators, service satisfaction, and clinical birth outcomes. Given the limited sample size, a qualitative arm was conducted to complement statistical findings: semistructured interviews with 20 women (10 per group) were analyzed thematically. Quantitative and qualitative results were integrated during interpretation to provide a comprehensive evaluation.
Results: Compared with the experiential class alone, the combined intervention was associated with higher knowledge scores (mean difference 1.6 points, 95% CI 0.8-2.4), stronger adherence to recommended health practices (composite adherence score difference 1.0, 95% CI 0.4-1.6), and higher overall service satisfaction (mean difference 0.6, 95% CI 0.2-1.0). Across multiple domains, a higher proportion of participants in the intervention group met dietary, exercise, and supplementation recommendations. Clinical outcome differences were exploratory, as the study was not powered for these end points. Qualitative analysis revealed 3 mechanisms, such as empowerment and self-efficacy, practice and persistence, and systemic/environmental support, through which the intervention influenced experiences and practices.
Conclusions: The experiential class plus online logging model is feasible and acceptable in a real-world antenatal setting. Although limited by a small sample size, findings suggest that the intervention improves maternal knowledge, health practices, and service experiences and may inform future adequately powered trials to evaluate pregnancy outcomes. Qualitative insights highlight mechanisms of health practice change and provide contextual depth, underscoring the value of mixed methods designs in maternal health research.
背景:围产期孕产妇保健是全球公共卫生的优先事项。虽然产前教育得到了广泛实施,但传统的以讲座为基础的模式往往无法实现持续的行为改变。将体验式学习与数字支持相结合的创新方法可以增强孕产妇的知识、自我管理和妊娠结局。目的:本研究旨在评估中国孕妇体验课堂与在线日志相结合的干预措施的可行性和初步效果,并探讨其对卫生实践和服务体验的影响机制。方法:采用混合方法设计对北京市某区级妇幼保健院进行调查。在定量组,40名妇女(干预组,n=20;对照组,n=20)入组进行准实验比较。结果包括知识-态度-实践指标、服务满意度和临床分娩结果。鉴于样本量有限,进行了定性研究以补充统计结果:对20名女性(每组10名)进行了半结构化访谈,并对主题进行了分析。在解释过程中,将定量和定性结果结合起来,进行综合评价。结果:与单独体验课相比,联合干预具有更高的知识得分(平均差异1.6分,95% CI 0.8-2.4),更强的健康实践依从性(综合依从性得分差异1.0,95% CI 0.4-1.6)和更高的整体服务满意度(平均差异0.6,95% CI 0.2-1.0)。在多个领域,干预组中更高比例的参与者符合饮食、运动和补充建议。临床结果差异是探索性的,因为该研究没有为这些终点提供动力。定性分析揭示了授权与自我效能、实践与坚持、系统/环境支持等3种干预机制对经验与实践的影响。结论:体验式课堂加在线记录模式在真实的产前环境中是可行和可接受的。尽管样本量有限,但研究结果表明,该干预措施改善了孕产妇知识、保健做法和服务体验,并可能为未来评估妊娠结局的充分有力试验提供信息。定性见解强调卫生实践变化的机制,并提供上下文深度,强调混合方法设计在孕产妇健康研究中的价值。