Natalia Savychuk, Vasyl Pekhno, Anastasiia Liakhovska, Roman Sulik, Ivan Riabko
{"title":"Brain parcellation for TMD neuroimaging: a critical narrative review.","authors":"Natalia Savychuk, Vasyl Pekhno, Anastasiia Liakhovska, Roman Sulik, Ivan Riabko","doi":"10.1038/s41405-026-00407-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze modern brain mapping for neurobiological mechanisms of temporomandibular disorders, with particular emphasis on structural and functional alterations, employing advanced neuroimaging techniques such as fMRI and DTI. Furthermore, this study aims to identify the most appropriate combination of brain parcellation schemes that comprehensively cover cortical, subcortical, and brainstem structures to enhance the accuracy and standardization of neuroimaging protocols in TMD research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Scientific sources were searched in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar as of 29.06.2025, 689 records were identified for PRISMA workflow, of which 676 records remained for screening after the removing duplicates and irrelevant items, 630 records were excluded per prespecified criteria (inappropriate diagnoses, insufficiently described rapid studies, metabolic disorders), and 46 studies were included in the qualitative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We compare anatomical, functional, and multimodal atlases (Desikan-Killiany, Destrieux, Schaefer, HCP-MMP1.0, Brainnetome, SUIT, Brainstem atlases) in terms of fMRI/DTI compatibility and relevance of regions of interest.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The authors suggest that the use of a combined parcellation scheme: HCP-MMP1.0 for the highly detailed cortex, SUIT for the cerebellum, specialized brainstem atlases-which cover corticocortical, cerebellar, and brainstem connections-increases mapping accuracy and meets modern requirements for the standardization of neuroimaging protocols in studies of the TMD.</p>","PeriodicalId":36997,"journal":{"name":"BDJ Open","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13099999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BDJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-026-00407-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze modern brain mapping for neurobiological mechanisms of temporomandibular disorders, with particular emphasis on structural and functional alterations, employing advanced neuroimaging techniques such as fMRI and DTI. Furthermore, this study aims to identify the most appropriate combination of brain parcellation schemes that comprehensively cover cortical, subcortical, and brainstem structures to enhance the accuracy and standardization of neuroimaging protocols in TMD research.
Methods: Scientific sources were searched in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar as of 29.06.2025, 689 records were identified for PRISMA workflow, of which 676 records remained for screening after the removing duplicates and irrelevant items, 630 records were excluded per prespecified criteria (inappropriate diagnoses, insufficiently described rapid studies, metabolic disorders), and 46 studies were included in the qualitative analysis.
Results: We compare anatomical, functional, and multimodal atlases (Desikan-Killiany, Destrieux, Schaefer, HCP-MMP1.0, Brainnetome, SUIT, Brainstem atlases) in terms of fMRI/DTI compatibility and relevance of regions of interest.
Conclusions: The authors suggest that the use of a combined parcellation scheme: HCP-MMP1.0 for the highly detailed cortex, SUIT for the cerebellum, specialized brainstem atlases-which cover corticocortical, cerebellar, and brainstem connections-increases mapping accuracy and meets modern requirements for the standardization of neuroimaging protocols in studies of the TMD.
目的:利用先进的神经成像技术,如fMRI和DTI,分析颞下颌疾病的现代脑成像神经生物学机制,特别强调结构和功能改变。此外,本研究旨在确定最合适的脑包裹方案组合,全面覆盖皮层、皮层下和脑干结构,以提高TMD研究中神经成像方案的准确性和标准化。方法:截至2025年6月29日,检索PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和谷歌Scholar等科学文献,筛选到689条PRISMA工作流记录,剔除重复和不相关条目后,保留676条记录用于筛选,630条记录根据预设标准(不适当诊断、描述不充分的快速研究、代谢紊乱)排除,46项研究纳入定性分析。结果:我们比较了解剖、功能和多模式图谱(Desikan-Killiany、Destrieux、Schaefer、HCP-MMP1.0、Brainnetome、SUIT、脑干图谱)在fMRI/DTI的兼容性和感兴趣区域的相关性方面。结论:作者建议使用一种组合的分割方案:HCP-MMP1.0用于高度详细的皮层,SUIT用于小脑,专门的脑干图谱-包括皮质皮质,小脑和脑干连接-提高了制图精度,满足了TMD研究中神经成像协议标准化的现代要求。