Diagnostic utility of clinical genome reanalysis in rare pediatric disorders using long-read sequencing.

IF 3.6 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Elizabeth A Werren, Purva Vats, Gabriel E Rech, Michael Peracchio, Cameron King, Elizabeth J Charnysh, Ryan D Gorham, Peter A Audano, Peter N Robinson, Melissa A Kelly, Adam P Matson, Mark D Adams, Louisa Kalsner
{"title":"Diagnostic utility of clinical genome reanalysis in rare pediatric disorders using long-read sequencing.","authors":"Elizabeth A Werren, Purva Vats, Gabriel E Rech, Michael Peracchio, Cameron King, Elizabeth J Charnysh, Ryan D Gorham, Peter A Audano, Peter N Robinson, Melissa A Kelly, Adam P Matson, Mark D Adams, Louisa Kalsner","doi":"10.1016/j.xhgg.2026.100620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over half of presumed genetic disease cases remain undiagnosed following short-read exome (SR-ES) or genome sequencing (SR-GS). Long-read genome sequencing (LR-GS) shows promise for uncovering etiologies missed by SR genetic testing, particularly structural variants (SVs). However, SV interpretation remains challenging due to limitations in call reliability, population allele frequency estimates, and functional impact prediction. To advance clinical LR-GS implementation, we analyzed the genomes of 19 children with suspected rare genetic conditions and prior negative or inconclusive clinical SR-GS/-ES and their parents using PacBio HiFi LR-GS. One additional family with limited DNA underwent Illumina SR-GS only, and 11 probands received SR-GS to complement small variant detection. LR-GS data were processed using phased-assembly and read-based variant calling pipelines validated on SV positive controls, while SR-GS data were processed with the Illumina DRAGEN pipeline. Variants were prioritized using phenotype-driven approaches. Diagnostic variants (likely pathogenic or pathogenic) were identified in 2/20 (10%) families, while an additional 5/20 (25%) harbored findings of uncertain diagnostic significance, including variants of uncertain significance (VUS) and variants in genes of uncertain significance (GUS). All reported variants were detected independently of LR-GS by research SR-GS or by reanalysis of prior clinical SR data. Several LR-GS SV candidates were excluded after population allele frequency filtering, underscoring its importance in clinical SV interpretation. Overall, the observed 10% increase in diagnostic yield was achievable through SR analysis alone, as LR-GS was not required to identify diagnostic variants in this cohort. Functional studies are needed to clarify the clinical relevance of uncertain findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":34530,"journal":{"name":"HGG Advances","volume":" ","pages":"100620"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HGG Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xhgg.2026.100620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over half of presumed genetic disease cases remain undiagnosed following short-read exome (SR-ES) or genome sequencing (SR-GS). Long-read genome sequencing (LR-GS) shows promise for uncovering etiologies missed by SR genetic testing, particularly structural variants (SVs). However, SV interpretation remains challenging due to limitations in call reliability, population allele frequency estimates, and functional impact prediction. To advance clinical LR-GS implementation, we analyzed the genomes of 19 children with suspected rare genetic conditions and prior negative or inconclusive clinical SR-GS/-ES and their parents using PacBio HiFi LR-GS. One additional family with limited DNA underwent Illumina SR-GS only, and 11 probands received SR-GS to complement small variant detection. LR-GS data were processed using phased-assembly and read-based variant calling pipelines validated on SV positive controls, while SR-GS data were processed with the Illumina DRAGEN pipeline. Variants were prioritized using phenotype-driven approaches. Diagnostic variants (likely pathogenic or pathogenic) were identified in 2/20 (10%) families, while an additional 5/20 (25%) harbored findings of uncertain diagnostic significance, including variants of uncertain significance (VUS) and variants in genes of uncertain significance (GUS). All reported variants were detected independently of LR-GS by research SR-GS or by reanalysis of prior clinical SR data. Several LR-GS SV candidates were excluded after population allele frequency filtering, underscoring its importance in clinical SV interpretation. Overall, the observed 10% increase in diagnostic yield was achievable through SR analysis alone, as LR-GS was not required to identify diagnostic variants in this cohort. Functional studies are needed to clarify the clinical relevance of uncertain findings.

临床基因组再分析在罕见儿科疾病诊断中的应用。
在短读外显子组(SR-ES)或基因组测序(SR-GS)后,超过一半的假定遗传病病例仍未得到诊断。长读基因组测序(LR-GS)有望揭示SR基因检测遗漏的病因,特别是结构变异(SVs)。然而,由于呼叫可靠性、种群等位基因频率估计和功能影响预测的限制,SV解释仍然具有挑战性。为了推进临床LR-GS的实施,我们使用PacBio HiFi LR-GS分析了19名疑似罕见遗传疾病和既往阴性或不确定临床SR-GS/-ES的儿童及其父母的基因组。另外一个DNA有限的家族仅接受Illumina SR-GS检测,11个先证者接受SR-GS检测以补充小变异检测。LR-GS数据使用在SV阳性对照中验证的分阶段组装和基于读取的变体调用管道处理,而SR-GS数据使用Illumina DRAGEN管道处理。使用表型驱动的方法对变体进行优先排序。诊断变异(可能是致病的或致病的)在2/20(10%)的家族中被发现,而另外5/20(25%)的发现具有不确定的诊断意义,包括不确定意义的变异(VUS)和不确定意义的基因变异(GUS)。所有报告的变异都是通过研究SR- gs或通过重新分析先前的临床SR数据独立于LR-GS检测到的。在群体等位基因频率过滤后,排除了几个LR-GS SV候选基因,强调了其在临床SV解释中的重要性。总体而言,仅通过SR分析就可以实现10%的诊断率提高,因为在该队列中不需要LR-GS来识别诊断变异。需要功能性研究来澄清不确定发现的临床相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HGG Advances
HGG Advances Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
69
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书