Hypoxia and DNA-Repair Radiosensitivity Signatures Are Associated with Radiotherapy-Modified Survival in TCGA Breast Cancer, with External Prognostic Validation of the Hypoxia Score in METABRIC.

IF 3.6 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
BioTech Pub Date : 2026-03-31 DOI:10.3390/biotech15020028
Jimmy Carter Osei, Mei-Han Chen, Tim A D Smith
{"title":"Hypoxia and DNA-Repair Radiosensitivity Signatures Are Associated with Radiotherapy-Modified Survival in TCGA Breast Cancer, with External Prognostic Validation of the Hypoxia Score in METABRIC.","authors":"Jimmy Carter Osei, Mei-Han Chen, Tim A D Smith","doi":"10.3390/biotech15020028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radiotherapy (RT) is one of the main treatments for breast cancer, but response varies between patients. Tumour hypoxia and intrinsic radiosensitivity are major determinants of response to RT. Using TCGA-BRCA, a 563-gene hypoxia meta-signature was built by combining curated hypoxia gene sets from MSigDB with published hypoxia metagenes (Buffa, Winter, Elvidge, Fardin, and related sets). After Cox screening and penalised regression, a simple three-gene hypoxia score (CP, GPC3, STC1) was derived. In parallel, based on DSB-repair factors highlighted by Mladenov et al. as key regulators of intrinsic radiosensitivity, a four-gene radiosensitivity (RS) signature (ATR, RPA2, BLM, MRE11A) was trained using only RT-treated patients. In TCGA, both signatures were prognostic and showed significant interaction with RT status in Cox models. The hypoxia score was strongly associated with worse outcomes in RT-untreated patients, but this effect was much weaker in RT-treated patients (Hypoxia × RT HR = 0.009, <i>p</i> = 0.044). The RS score showed a similarly strong interaction with RT (RS × RT HR = 0.011, <i>p</i> = 0.003). When we combined both signatures into one interaction model, it gave the best performance (C-index = 0.785), and both interaction terms stayed independently significant. The hypoxia score was then validated externally in METABRIC (N = 1979; 1143 events), where it remained associated with overall survival, although more weakly than in TCGA (HR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.10-1.63; <i>p</i> = 0.0042). Overall, these results suggest that hypoxia and DSB-repair capacity capture two complementary sides of radiosensitivity and RT-modified survival patterns, and they support further prospective testing and validation in independent datasets with strong RT annotation.</p>","PeriodicalId":34490,"journal":{"name":"BioTech","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13108141/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioTech","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biotech15020028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radiotherapy (RT) is one of the main treatments for breast cancer, but response varies between patients. Tumour hypoxia and intrinsic radiosensitivity are major determinants of response to RT. Using TCGA-BRCA, a 563-gene hypoxia meta-signature was built by combining curated hypoxia gene sets from MSigDB with published hypoxia metagenes (Buffa, Winter, Elvidge, Fardin, and related sets). After Cox screening and penalised regression, a simple three-gene hypoxia score (CP, GPC3, STC1) was derived. In parallel, based on DSB-repair factors highlighted by Mladenov et al. as key regulators of intrinsic radiosensitivity, a four-gene radiosensitivity (RS) signature (ATR, RPA2, BLM, MRE11A) was trained using only RT-treated patients. In TCGA, both signatures were prognostic and showed significant interaction with RT status in Cox models. The hypoxia score was strongly associated with worse outcomes in RT-untreated patients, but this effect was much weaker in RT-treated patients (Hypoxia × RT HR = 0.009, p = 0.044). The RS score showed a similarly strong interaction with RT (RS × RT HR = 0.011, p = 0.003). When we combined both signatures into one interaction model, it gave the best performance (C-index = 0.785), and both interaction terms stayed independently significant. The hypoxia score was then validated externally in METABRIC (N = 1979; 1143 events), where it remained associated with overall survival, although more weakly than in TCGA (HR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.10-1.63; p = 0.0042). Overall, these results suggest that hypoxia and DSB-repair capacity capture two complementary sides of radiosensitivity and RT-modified survival patterns, and they support further prospective testing and validation in independent datasets with strong RT annotation.

缺氧和dna修复放射敏感性特征与TCGA乳腺癌放疗改善生存率相关,并在METABRIC中对缺氧评分进行外部预后验证。
放射治疗(RT)是乳腺癌的主要治疗方法之一,但不同患者的反应不同。肿瘤缺氧和固有的放射敏感性是rt反应的主要决定因素。使用TCGA-BRCA,通过将MSigDB的缺氧基因集与已发表的缺氧元基因集(Buffa, Winter, Elvidge, Fardin和相关集)相结合,建立了563个基因的缺氧元特征。经过Cox筛选和惩罚回归,得出简单的三基因缺氧评分(CP, GPC3, STC1)。同时,基于Mladenov等人强调的dsb修复因子作为内在放射敏感性的关键调节因子,仅使用接受rt治疗的患者训练了四基因放射敏感性(RS)特征(ATR, RPA2, BLM, MRE11A)。在TCGA中,这两个特征都是预后,并且在Cox模型中显示出与RT状态的显著相互作用。缺氧评分与未接受RT治疗的患者预后较差密切相关,但在接受RT治疗的患者中,这种影响要弱得多(hypoxia × RT HR = 0.009, p = 0.044)。RS评分与RT的交互作用同样强(RS × RT HR = 0.011, p = 0.003)。当我们将两个签名合并到一个交互模型中时,它给出了最好的性能(C-index = 0.785),并且两个交互项都保持独立显著。然后在METABRIC (N = 1979; 1143个事件)中外部验证缺氧评分,它仍然与总生存相关,尽管比TCGA弱(HR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.10-1.63; p = 0.0042)。总的来说,这些结果表明,缺氧和dsb修复能力捕获了放射敏感性和RT修饰的生存模式的两个互补方面,它们支持在具有强RT注释的独立数据集中进行进一步的前瞻性测试和验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BioTech
BioTech Immunology and Microbiology-Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书