[A retrospective study on the therapeutic effect of neck dissection in patients with cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].

Q4 Medicine
F Zhang, Z Wang, X W Zhang, Z Y Wang, X K Chen, Y Li, Y Li, J W Luo, S Y Liu, C M An
{"title":"[A retrospective study on the therapeutic effect of neck dissection in patients with cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].","authors":"F Zhang, Z Wang, X W Zhang, Z Y Wang, X K Chen, Y Li, Y Li, J W Luo, S Y Liu, C M An","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20260213-00094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the surgical outcomes in cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CESCC) patients with cervical lymph node metastasis (CLNM). <b>Methods:</b> We performed a retrospective analysis on 180 CESCC patients (141 males, 39 females; with median age of 59 years, ranging in age from 24 to 76) who underwent surgical treatment at the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from February 2001 to October 2023. Based on the regions of cervical lymph node metastasis, patients were divided into three groups: non-lymph node metastasis group, central compartment metastasis-only group, and a combined central and lateral cervical metastasis group. We aimed to compare the impact of cervical lymph node metastasis regions and different preoperative intervention regimens on survival outcomes. The 3-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with prognosis. <b>Results:</b> Cervical lymph node dissection was performed in 123 patients with CLNM. Among all patients, 54 patients received preoperative chemotherapy, and 19 patients received preoperative chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy. The median OS in the entire cohort was 46 months, with 3-and 5-year OS rates of 58.04% and 42.02%, respectively. Patients without CLNM exhibited significant higher 5-year OS rate than those with CLNM (54.86% <i>vs</i>. 35.69%, χ<sup>2</sup>=7.29, <i>P</i>=0.007). No significant difference in 5-year OS rate was observed between the central neck lymph node metastasis-only group (54 patients) and the combined central and lateral neck lymph node metastasis group (69 patients) (35.98% <i>vs</i>. 35.36%, χ<sup>2</sup>=0.17, <i>P</i>=0.676). Preoperative chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy significantly reduced the mortality risk (<i>HR</i>=0.61 and 0.12, respectively; both <i>P</i><0.05). Regarding the 3-year OS rate, there was a significant difference among the chemoimmunotherapy group (90.91%), chemotherapy-only (65.89%) and no-preoperative chemotherapy (49.68%) groups (overall χ<sup>2</sup>=11.22, <i>P</i>=0.004). Compared with patients who did not receive radiotherapy, preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy were not associated with a significant reduction in mortality risk (both <i>P</i>>0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> After cervical lymph node dissection, the surgical efficacy of lateral CLNM patients resembles that of patients with central CLNM. Preoperative chemoimmunotherapy significantly improves the OS rates of CESCC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23987,"journal":{"name":"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery","volume":"61 ","pages":"394-402"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20260213-00094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the surgical outcomes in cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CESCC) patients with cervical lymph node metastasis (CLNM). Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis on 180 CESCC patients (141 males, 39 females; with median age of 59 years, ranging in age from 24 to 76) who underwent surgical treatment at the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from February 2001 to October 2023. Based on the regions of cervical lymph node metastasis, patients were divided into three groups: non-lymph node metastasis group, central compartment metastasis-only group, and a combined central and lateral cervical metastasis group. We aimed to compare the impact of cervical lymph node metastasis regions and different preoperative intervention regimens on survival outcomes. The 3-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with prognosis. Results: Cervical lymph node dissection was performed in 123 patients with CLNM. Among all patients, 54 patients received preoperative chemotherapy, and 19 patients received preoperative chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy. The median OS in the entire cohort was 46 months, with 3-and 5-year OS rates of 58.04% and 42.02%, respectively. Patients without CLNM exhibited significant higher 5-year OS rate than those with CLNM (54.86% vs. 35.69%, χ2=7.29, P=0.007). No significant difference in 5-year OS rate was observed between the central neck lymph node metastasis-only group (54 patients) and the combined central and lateral neck lymph node metastasis group (69 patients) (35.98% vs. 35.36%, χ2=0.17, P=0.676). Preoperative chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy significantly reduced the mortality risk (HR=0.61 and 0.12, respectively; both P<0.05). Regarding the 3-year OS rate, there was a significant difference among the chemoimmunotherapy group (90.91%), chemotherapy-only (65.89%) and no-preoperative chemotherapy (49.68%) groups (overall χ2=11.22, P=0.004). Compared with patients who did not receive radiotherapy, preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy were not associated with a significant reduction in mortality risk (both P>0.05). Conclusions: After cervical lymph node dissection, the surgical efficacy of lateral CLNM patients resembles that of patients with central CLNM. Preoperative chemoimmunotherapy significantly improves the OS rates of CESCC patients.

[颈清扫术治疗宫颈食管鳞状细胞癌疗效的回顾性研究]。
目的:探讨宫颈食管鳞状细胞癌(CESCC)伴颈部淋巴结转移(CLNM)的手术治疗效果。方法:回顾性分析2001年2月至2023年10月在中国医学科学院肿瘤医院行手术治疗的180例CESCC患者,其中男性141例,女性39例,年龄24 ~ 76岁,中位年龄59岁。根据颈部淋巴结转移的区域,将患者分为3组:无淋巴结转移组、仅中央室转移组和中央和外侧合并宫颈转移组。我们的目的是比较颈部淋巴结转移区域和不同术前干预方案对生存结果的影响。采用Kaplan-Meier法估计3年和5年总生存率(OS),并进行单因素和多因素Cox回归分析,以确定与预后相关的因素。结果:123例CLNM患者行颈部淋巴结清扫术。其中术前化疗54例,术前化疗联合免疫治疗19例。整个队列的中位生存期为46个月,3年和5年生存期分别为58.04%和42.02%。无CLNM患者的5年OS率明显高于有CLNM患者(54.86% vs. 35.69%, χ2=7.29, P=0.007)。单纯中枢性颈淋巴转移组(54例)与中枢性颈淋巴转移组(69例)的5年OS率比较,差异无统计学意义(35.98% vs 35.36%, χ2=0.17, P=0.676)。术前化疗和化疗免疫治疗显著降低死亡风险(HR分别为0.61和0.12;P2=11.22, P=0.004)。与未接受放疗的患者相比,术前和术后放疗与死亡风险降低无显著相关性(P < 0.05)。结论:颈淋巴结清扫后,侧边型CLNM患者的手术效果与中枢性CLNM患者相似。术前化疗免疫治疗可显著提高CESCC患者的总生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12432
期刊介绍: Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery is a high-level medical science and technology journal sponsored and published directly by the Chinese Medical Association, reflecting the significant research progress in the field of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery in China, and striving to promote the domestic and international academic exchanges for the purpose of running the journal. Over the years, the journal has been ranked first in the total citation frequency list of national scientific and technical journals published by the Documentation and Intelligence Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the China Science Citation Database, and has always ranked first among the scientific and technical journals in the related fields. Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery has been included in the authoritative databases PubMed, Chinese core journals, CSCD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书