Tremor modulation: a systematic review of resetting by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2026-01-23 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.55730/1300-0144.6175
Handan Uzunçakmak-Uyanik, Çağrı Mesut Temuçin
{"title":"Tremor modulation: a systematic review of resetting by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation.","authors":"Handan Uzunçakmak-Uyanik, Çağrı Mesut Temuçin","doi":"10.55730/1300-0144.6175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Tremor arises from mechanical, reflex, or central oscillatory mechanisms. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can transiently perturb ongoing tremor and enables the quantitative assessment of phase resetting, offering circuit-level insight into tremor types. Although numerous studies have applied TMS-induced resetting, the findings have not been systematically reviewed. This study systematically reviews human studies evaluating TMS-induced tremor resetting across tremor types.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed and Google Scholar identified human studies using TMS to perturb tremor or rhythmic movement. Search terms included \"tremor resetting,\" \"resetting of tremor,\" \"tremor phase shift,\" \"tremor phase reset,\" \"transcranial magnetic stimulation,\" and \"central oscillator.\" Inclusion criteria were human participants, experimental TMS perturbation, and quantitative tremor phase/resetting outcomes. Exclusion criteria were animal studies, therapeutic repetitive TMS trials without resetting analyses, and isolated case reports. Two researchers independently screened and extracted data. The PRISMA 2020 guidelines were followed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one studies were identified, three of which were excluded from the primary synthesis (two case reports and one qualitative-only design). Eighteen studies remained, which addressed essential tremor (ET) (n = 6), Parkinson's disease tremor (PDT) (n = 7), orthostatic tremor (OT) (n = 4), palatal tremor (n = 1), dystonic tremor (DT) (n = 1), and voluntary rhythmic movement (n = 4). M1 stimulation reset ET, postural PDT, OT, palatal tremor, DT, and voluntary rhythmic movements. Rest PDT had inconsistent resetting by M1 stimulation and no resetting by cerebellar stimulation. Cerebellar stimulation reset postural PDT but not ET. The resetting index was associated with the stimulus intensity and duration of the silent period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TMS-induced resetting is a strong physiological tool for differentiating tremor circuits. M1 acts as a major convergence node, while cerebellar involvement is tremor-specific. Methodological heterogeneity and small samples limit the comparability of study results. Advances in targeting technologies and closed-loop and phase-locked protocols could enhance the diagnostic and therapeutic utility of resetting paradigms.</p>","PeriodicalId":23361,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"56 2","pages":"390-404"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13124215/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.6175","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: Tremor arises from mechanical, reflex, or central oscillatory mechanisms. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can transiently perturb ongoing tremor and enables the quantitative assessment of phase resetting, offering circuit-level insight into tremor types. Although numerous studies have applied TMS-induced resetting, the findings have not been systematically reviewed. This study systematically reviews human studies evaluating TMS-induced tremor resetting across tremor types.

Materials and methods: A systematic search of PubMed and Google Scholar identified human studies using TMS to perturb tremor or rhythmic movement. Search terms included "tremor resetting," "resetting of tremor," "tremor phase shift," "tremor phase reset," "transcranial magnetic stimulation," and "central oscillator." Inclusion criteria were human participants, experimental TMS perturbation, and quantitative tremor phase/resetting outcomes. Exclusion criteria were animal studies, therapeutic repetitive TMS trials without resetting analyses, and isolated case reports. Two researchers independently screened and extracted data. The PRISMA 2020 guidelines were followed.

Results: Twenty-one studies were identified, three of which were excluded from the primary synthesis (two case reports and one qualitative-only design). Eighteen studies remained, which addressed essential tremor (ET) (n = 6), Parkinson's disease tremor (PDT) (n = 7), orthostatic tremor (OT) (n = 4), palatal tremor (n = 1), dystonic tremor (DT) (n = 1), and voluntary rhythmic movement (n = 4). M1 stimulation reset ET, postural PDT, OT, palatal tremor, DT, and voluntary rhythmic movements. Rest PDT had inconsistent resetting by M1 stimulation and no resetting by cerebellar stimulation. Cerebellar stimulation reset postural PDT but not ET. The resetting index was associated with the stimulus intensity and duration of the silent period.

Conclusion: TMS-induced resetting is a strong physiological tool for differentiating tremor circuits. M1 acts as a major convergence node, while cerebellar involvement is tremor-specific. Methodological heterogeneity and small samples limit the comparability of study results. Advances in targeting technologies and closed-loop and phase-locked protocols could enhance the diagnostic and therapeutic utility of resetting paradigms.

震颤调节:单脉冲经颅磁刺激复位的系统回顾。
背景/目的:震颤由机械性、反射性或中枢振荡机制引起。经颅磁刺激(TMS)可以短暂地扰乱正在进行的震颤,并使相位重置的定量评估成为可能,为震颤类型提供电路级的洞察。尽管许多研究已经应用了经颅磁刺激诱导的重置,但研究结果尚未得到系统的回顾。本研究系统地回顾了评估tms诱发的不同类型震颤复位的人类研究。材料和方法:对PubMed和谷歌Scholar进行系统搜索,确定了使用TMS干扰震颤或节律性运动的人类研究。搜索词包括“震颤复位”、“震颤复位”、“震颤相移”、“震颤相复位”、“经颅磁刺激”和“中央振荡器”。纳入标准为人类受试者、实验性经颅磁刺激扰动和定量震颤期/重置结果。排除标准为动物研究、无重置分析的治疗性重复TMS试验和孤立病例报告。两名研究人员独立筛选和提取数据。遵循PRISMA 2020指南。结果:确定了21项研究,其中3项被排除在初级综合之外(2例病例报告和1例仅定性设计)。仍有18项研究,涉及特发性震颤(ET) (n = 6)、帕金森氏病震颤(PDT) (n = 7)、直立性震颤(OT) (n = 4)、腭部震颤(n = 1)、肌张力障碍震颤(DT) (n = 1)和自主节律运动(n = 4)。M1刺激复位ET,体位PDT, OT,腭颤,DT和自主节律运动。静息PDT在M1刺激下复位不一致,小脑刺激下无复位。小脑刺激可复位体位PDT,但不复位ET。复位指数与刺激强度和静息期持续时间有关。结论:颅磁刺激诱发的复位是鉴别震颤回路的有力生理工具。M1是主要的会聚结,而小脑受累是震颤特异性的。方法学的异质性和小样本限制了研究结果的可比性。靶向技术和闭环锁相协议的进步可以提高重置范式的诊断和治疗效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Turkish Journal of Medical sciences is a peer-reviewed comprehensive resource that provides critical up-to-date information on the broad spectrum of general medical sciences. The Journal intended to publish original medical scientific papers regarding the priority based on the prominence, significance, and timeliness of the findings. However since the audience of the Journal is not limited to any subspeciality in a wide variety of medical disciplines, the papers focusing on the technical  details of a given medical  subspeciality may not be evaluated for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书