Pae Ora - Healthy Futures: lessons learned from the first New Zealand Rural Health Strategy.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Rural and remote health Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-22 DOI:10.22605/RRH9922
Liam Glynn, Sarah Clarke, Helen MacGregor, Julia Cronin, Grant Davidson, Garry Nixon, Rachel Pearce, Joseph Scott-Jones, Neta Smith, Jenni Vernon, Nicky Welch, Peter Hayes, Monica Casey, Veronika Rasic, Theadora Swift Koller
{"title":"Pae Ora - Healthy Futures: lessons learned from the first New Zealand Rural Health Strategy.","authors":"Liam Glynn, Sarah Clarke, Helen MacGregor, Julia Cronin, Grant Davidson, Garry Nixon, Rachel Pearce, Joseph Scott-Jones, Neta Smith, Jenni Vernon, Nicky Welch, Peter Hayes, Monica Casey, Veronika Rasic, Theadora Swift Koller","doi":"10.22605/RRH9922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>New Zealand began reform of its health system in 2018 with the commissioning of the Health and Disability System Review. The emergence of a specific rural health strategy was contributed to significantly by: the restructuring of the healthcare system with a focus on equity; the increased awareness of geographic inequities for rural communities with the emergence of high-quality research data demonstrating clear rural/urban health disparities; and the emergence of the Hauora Taiwhenua Rural Health Network as a single strong collective membership-led and driven, advocacy voice for health care in rural communities. The Rural Health Strategy was developed by the Ministry of Health and approved by government, with input from the M&#257;ori Health Authority (disestablished in 2024), Health New Zealand, other government agencies, and engagement with the health sector, stakeholders and the general public.</p><p><strong>Issues: </strong>Historically, rural areas in New Zealand have faced many challenges in health service coverage and health outcomes compared with urban areas. Generic rural classifications have underestimated rural health needs and failed to highlight health inequities in rural communities. The new Geographic Classification for Health has now addressed this issue in New Zealand. The Rural Health Strategy identifies five priorities over the next 10 years: considering rural communities as a priority group; prevention; services are available closer to home for rural communities; rural communities are supported to access services at a distance; and a valued and flexible workforce (including integrated, broader and different workforce models). Over time, monitoring of the implementation of the priorities of the strategy, and monitoring of overall health outcomes for rural communities, will assess the progress made towards the vision set out in the Rural Health Strategy.</p><p><strong>Lessons learned: </strong>The emergence of better information on rural health outcomes, together with effective advocacy for rural health, contributed to rural communities becoming a priority group for the New Zealand Government, thus mandating the development of a Rural Health Strategy. The resulting Rural Health Strategy is a key first step towards rural health equity and improving rural health outcomes in New Zealand. Lessons learnt through this process include, but are not limited to: the value of strong collaboration among, and advocacy by, rural health stakeholders; the role of the Office for Rural Communities in assessing rural community impacts and rural proofing policy changes across government; the importance of evidence-based policies and interventions in rural areas; the potential for fostering learning/solution showcasing across local levels; the central role of community engagement and empowerment; and the importance of emphasising Indigenous rights and cultural responsiveness in health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":21460,"journal":{"name":"Rural and remote health","volume":"26 2","pages":"9922"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural and remote health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH9922","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: New Zealand began reform of its health system in 2018 with the commissioning of the Health and Disability System Review. The emergence of a specific rural health strategy was contributed to significantly by: the restructuring of the healthcare system with a focus on equity; the increased awareness of geographic inequities for rural communities with the emergence of high-quality research data demonstrating clear rural/urban health disparities; and the emergence of the Hauora Taiwhenua Rural Health Network as a single strong collective membership-led and driven, advocacy voice for health care in rural communities. The Rural Health Strategy was developed by the Ministry of Health and approved by government, with input from the Māori Health Authority (disestablished in 2024), Health New Zealand, other government agencies, and engagement with the health sector, stakeholders and the general public.

Issues: Historically, rural areas in New Zealand have faced many challenges in health service coverage and health outcomes compared with urban areas. Generic rural classifications have underestimated rural health needs and failed to highlight health inequities in rural communities. The new Geographic Classification for Health has now addressed this issue in New Zealand. The Rural Health Strategy identifies five priorities over the next 10 years: considering rural communities as a priority group; prevention; services are available closer to home for rural communities; rural communities are supported to access services at a distance; and a valued and flexible workforce (including integrated, broader and different workforce models). Over time, monitoring of the implementation of the priorities of the strategy, and monitoring of overall health outcomes for rural communities, will assess the progress made towards the vision set out in the Rural Health Strategy.

Lessons learned: The emergence of better information on rural health outcomes, together with effective advocacy for rural health, contributed to rural communities becoming a priority group for the New Zealand Government, thus mandating the development of a Rural Health Strategy. The resulting Rural Health Strategy is a key first step towards rural health equity and improving rural health outcomes in New Zealand. Lessons learnt through this process include, but are not limited to: the value of strong collaboration among, and advocacy by, rural health stakeholders; the role of the Office for Rural Communities in assessing rural community impacts and rural proofing policy changes across government; the importance of evidence-based policies and interventions in rural areas; the potential for fostering learning/solution showcasing across local levels; the central role of community engagement and empowerment; and the importance of emphasising Indigenous rights and cultural responsiveness in health care.

Pae Ora——健康的未来:从第一个新西兰农村卫生战略中吸取的教训。
背景:新西兰于2018年启动了健康和残疾系统审查,开始改革其卫生系统。具体农村保健战略的出现主要得益于:以公平为重点的保健制度的改组;随着高质量研究数据的出现,表明农村/城市健康存在明显差异,对农村社区地域不平等现象的认识有所提高;以及Hauora Taiwhenua农村卫生网络的出现,作为一个强大的集体成员领导和推动的,倡导农村社区卫生保健的声音。《农村卫生战略》由卫生部制定并经政府批准,得到了奥里岛卫生局(2024年被撤销)、新西兰卫生部和其他政府机构的投入,并得到了卫生部门、利益攸关方和公众的参与。问题:历史上,与城市地区相比,新西兰农村地区在保健服务覆盖面和保健结果方面面临许多挑战。一般农村分类低估了农村卫生需求,未能突出农村社区的卫生不公平现象。新的卫生地理分类现已在新西兰解决了这一问题。农村保健战略确定了今后10年的五个优先事项:将农村社区视为优先群体;预防;在离家较近的地方为农村社区提供服务;支持农村社区远程获得服务;有价值和灵活的劳动力(包括集成的、更广泛的和不同的劳动力模式)。随着时间的推移,对战略优先事项执行情况的监测以及对农村社区总体卫生成果的监测,将评估在实现《农村卫生战略》所述愿景方面取得的进展。经验教训:关于农村保健成果的更好信息的出现,以及对农村保健的有效宣传,促使农村社区成为新西兰政府的优先群体,从而要求制定农村保健战略。由此产生的农村保健战略是新西兰实现农村保健公平和改善农村保健成果的关键的第一步。从这一进程中吸取的经验教训包括但不限于:农村卫生利益攸关方之间强有力合作和宣传的价值;农村社区办公室在评估整个政府对农村社区的影响和农村证明政策变化方面的作用;农村地区循证政策和干预措施的重要性;促进在地方各级展示学习/解决方案的潜力;社区参与和赋权的核心作用;强调土著权利和在保健方面对文化作出反应的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rural and remote health
Rural and remote health Rural Health-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
145
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rural and Remote Health is a not-for-profit, online-only, peer-reviewed academic publication. It aims to further rural and remote health education, research and practice. The primary purpose of the Journal is to publish and so provide an international knowledge-base of peer-reviewed material from rural health practitioners (medical, nursing and allied health professionals and health workers), educators, researchers and policy makers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书