Trends in self-reported reproductive tract infections and treatment-seeking behaviour among Indian women, 2005-2021.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Aditya Singh, Anshika Singh, Rakesh Chandra
{"title":"Trends in self-reported reproductive tract infections and treatment-seeking behaviour among Indian women, 2005-2021.","authors":"Aditya Singh, Anshika Singh, Rakesh Chandra","doi":"10.1186/s12978-026-02337-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reproductive tract infections (RTIs) are a major source of reproductive morbidity among women in India, but evidence on long-term trends in prevalence and care-seeking behaviour remains limited. This study examines trends in self-reported RTI symptoms and associated care-seeking patterns among Indian women aged 15–49 years from 2005 to 2021, using data from three rounds of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3, 2005–06; NFHS-4, 2015–16; NFHS-5, 2019–21). The analysis is based on a pooled sample of 265,497 eligible women. National RTI prevalence remained stable at approximately 11% in 2005–06 and 2015–16, with a modest rise to 12.3% in 2019–21. However, there was substantial variation across states. High-burden states such as Madhya Pradesh and Assam saw declines, while several low- and medium-burden states (e.g., Meghalaya and Himachal Pradesh) experienced notable increases. Only about 40% of women with RTI symptoms sought treatment. Public sector treatment increased from 11.5% in 2005–06 to 19.0% in 2019–21, while private sector reliance declined overall despite some fluctuations. Adjusted odds of reporting RTI symptoms increased over time (AOR 1.29; 95% CI 1.25–1.33 in 2015–16 and AOR 1.52; 95% CI 1.48–1.57 in 2019–21, relative to 2005–06). The likelihood of seeking care from public health facilities increased substantially (AOR 1.47; 95% CI 1.33–1.62 in 2015–16 and AOR 1.88; 95% CI 1.70–2.08 in 2019–21), whereas the likelihood of private-sector use declined in 2015–16 (AOR 0.77; 95% CI 0.72–0.84) but showed no statistically significant difference from baseline in 2019–21 (AOR 0.97; 95% CI 0.90–1.05). Sociodemographic factors, including wealth, education, region, and access barriers, significantly influenced both symptom reporting and treatment-seeking behaviour. Despite modest national changes, treatment-seeking remains low, and persistent state-level disparities highlight the need for context-specific and equitable reproductive health interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20899,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13267512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-026-02337-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reproductive tract infections (RTIs) are a major source of reproductive morbidity among women in India, but evidence on long-term trends in prevalence and care-seeking behaviour remains limited. This study examines trends in self-reported RTI symptoms and associated care-seeking patterns among Indian women aged 15–49 years from 2005 to 2021, using data from three rounds of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3, 2005–06; NFHS-4, 2015–16; NFHS-5, 2019–21). The analysis is based on a pooled sample of 265,497 eligible women. National RTI prevalence remained stable at approximately 11% in 2005–06 and 2015–16, with a modest rise to 12.3% in 2019–21. However, there was substantial variation across states. High-burden states such as Madhya Pradesh and Assam saw declines, while several low- and medium-burden states (e.g., Meghalaya and Himachal Pradesh) experienced notable increases. Only about 40% of women with RTI symptoms sought treatment. Public sector treatment increased from 11.5% in 2005–06 to 19.0% in 2019–21, while private sector reliance declined overall despite some fluctuations. Adjusted odds of reporting RTI symptoms increased over time (AOR 1.29; 95% CI 1.25–1.33 in 2015–16 and AOR 1.52; 95% CI 1.48–1.57 in 2019–21, relative to 2005–06). The likelihood of seeking care from public health facilities increased substantially (AOR 1.47; 95% CI 1.33–1.62 in 2015–16 and AOR 1.88; 95% CI 1.70–2.08 in 2019–21), whereas the likelihood of private-sector use declined in 2015–16 (AOR 0.77; 95% CI 0.72–0.84) but showed no statistically significant difference from baseline in 2019–21 (AOR 0.97; 95% CI 0.90–1.05). Sociodemographic factors, including wealth, education, region, and access barriers, significantly influenced both symptom reporting and treatment-seeking behaviour. Despite modest national changes, treatment-seeking remains low, and persistent state-level disparities highlight the need for context-specific and equitable reproductive health interventions.

2005-2021年印度妇女自我报告的生殖道感染趋势和寻求治疗行为。
生殖道感染(RTIs)是印度妇女生殖疾病的一个主要来源,但关于患病率和求医行为的长期趋势的证据仍然有限。本研究利用三轮全国家庭健康调查(nfhs - 3,2005 - 06; nfhs - 4,2015 - 16; nfhs - 5,2019 - 21)的数据,调查了2005 - 2021年15-49岁印度妇女自我报告的RTI症状趋势和相关的求医模式。该分析基于265497名符合条件的女性的汇总样本。2005-06年和2015-16年,全国RTI患病率稳定在11%左右,2019-21年小幅上升至12.3%。然而,各州之间存在很大差异。中央邦(Madhya Pradesh)和阿萨姆邦(Assam)等负担沉重的邦出现了下降,而几个负担较轻和中等的邦(如梅加拉亚邦(Meghalaya)和喜马偕尔邦(Himachal Pradesh))则出现了显著增长。只有大约40%有RTI症状的女性寻求治疗。公共部门的待遇从2005-06年的11.5%上升到2019-21年的19.0%,而私营部门的依赖尽管出现了一些波动,但总体上有所下降。报告RTI症状的调整几率随着时间的推移而增加(与2005-06年相比,2015-16年AOR为1.29,95% CI为1.25-1.33,2019-21年AOR为1.52,95% CI为1.48-1.57)。从公共卫生机构就诊的可能性大幅增加(2015-16年AOR 1.47; 95% CI 1.33-1.62; 2019-21年AOR 1.88; 95% CI 1.70-2.08),而2015-16年私营部门就诊的可能性下降(AOR 0.77; 95% CI 0.72-0.84),但与2019-21年基线相比无统计学显著差异(AOR 0.97; 95% CI 0.90-1.05)。社会人口因素,包括财富、教育、地区和获取障碍,显著影响症状报告和寻求治疗的行为。尽管全国发生了适度的变化,但寻求治疗的人数仍然很低,而且州一级的持续差异突出表明需要针对具体情况采取公平的生殖健康干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reproductive Health
Reproductive Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
220
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Health focuses on all aspects of human reproduction. The journal includes sections dedicated to adolescent health, female fertility and midwifery and all content is open access. Reproductive health is defined as a state of physical, mental, and social well-being in all matters relating to the reproductive system, at all stages of life. Good reproductive health implies that people are able to have a satisfying and safe sex life, the capability to reproduce and the freedom to decide if, when, and how often to do so. Men and women should be informed about and have access to safe, effective, affordable, and acceptable methods of family planning of their choice, and the right to appropriate health-care services that enable women to safely go through pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书