{"title":"Trends in self-reported reproductive tract infections and treatment-seeking behaviour among Indian women, 2005-2021.","authors":"Aditya Singh, Anshika Singh, Rakesh Chandra","doi":"10.1186/s12978-026-02337-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reproductive tract infections (RTIs) are a major source of reproductive morbidity among women in India, but evidence on long-term trends in prevalence and care-seeking behaviour remains limited. This study examines trends in self-reported RTI symptoms and associated care-seeking patterns among Indian women aged 15–49 years from 2005 to 2021, using data from three rounds of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3, 2005–06; NFHS-4, 2015–16; NFHS-5, 2019–21). The analysis is based on a pooled sample of 265,497 eligible women. National RTI prevalence remained stable at approximately 11% in 2005–06 and 2015–16, with a modest rise to 12.3% in 2019–21. However, there was substantial variation across states. High-burden states such as Madhya Pradesh and Assam saw declines, while several low- and medium-burden states (e.g., Meghalaya and Himachal Pradesh) experienced notable increases. Only about 40% of women with RTI symptoms sought treatment. Public sector treatment increased from 11.5% in 2005–06 to 19.0% in 2019–21, while private sector reliance declined overall despite some fluctuations. Adjusted odds of reporting RTI symptoms increased over time (AOR 1.29; 95% CI 1.25–1.33 in 2015–16 and AOR 1.52; 95% CI 1.48–1.57 in 2019–21, relative to 2005–06). The likelihood of seeking care from public health facilities increased substantially (AOR 1.47; 95% CI 1.33–1.62 in 2015–16 and AOR 1.88; 95% CI 1.70–2.08 in 2019–21), whereas the likelihood of private-sector use declined in 2015–16 (AOR 0.77; 95% CI 0.72–0.84) but showed no statistically significant difference from baseline in 2019–21 (AOR 0.97; 95% CI 0.90–1.05). Sociodemographic factors, including wealth, education, region, and access barriers, significantly influenced both symptom reporting and treatment-seeking behaviour. Despite modest national changes, treatment-seeking remains low, and persistent state-level disparities highlight the need for context-specific and equitable reproductive health interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20899,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13267512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-026-02337-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Reproductive tract infections (RTIs) are a major source of reproductive morbidity among women in India, but evidence on long-term trends in prevalence and care-seeking behaviour remains limited. This study examines trends in self-reported RTI symptoms and associated care-seeking patterns among Indian women aged 15–49 years from 2005 to 2021, using data from three rounds of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3, 2005–06; NFHS-4, 2015–16; NFHS-5, 2019–21). The analysis is based on a pooled sample of 265,497 eligible women. National RTI prevalence remained stable at approximately 11% in 2005–06 and 2015–16, with a modest rise to 12.3% in 2019–21. However, there was substantial variation across states. High-burden states such as Madhya Pradesh and Assam saw declines, while several low- and medium-burden states (e.g., Meghalaya and Himachal Pradesh) experienced notable increases. Only about 40% of women with RTI symptoms sought treatment. Public sector treatment increased from 11.5% in 2005–06 to 19.0% in 2019–21, while private sector reliance declined overall despite some fluctuations. Adjusted odds of reporting RTI symptoms increased over time (AOR 1.29; 95% CI 1.25–1.33 in 2015–16 and AOR 1.52; 95% CI 1.48–1.57 in 2019–21, relative to 2005–06). The likelihood of seeking care from public health facilities increased substantially (AOR 1.47; 95% CI 1.33–1.62 in 2015–16 and AOR 1.88; 95% CI 1.70–2.08 in 2019–21), whereas the likelihood of private-sector use declined in 2015–16 (AOR 0.77; 95% CI 0.72–0.84) but showed no statistically significant difference from baseline in 2019–21 (AOR 0.97; 95% CI 0.90–1.05). Sociodemographic factors, including wealth, education, region, and access barriers, significantly influenced both symptom reporting and treatment-seeking behaviour. Despite modest national changes, treatment-seeking remains low, and persistent state-level disparities highlight the need for context-specific and equitable reproductive health interventions.
期刊介绍:
Reproductive Health focuses on all aspects of human reproduction. The journal includes sections dedicated to adolescent health, female fertility and midwifery and all content is open access.
Reproductive health is defined as a state of physical, mental, and social well-being in all matters relating to the reproductive system, at all stages of life. Good reproductive health implies that people are able to have a satisfying and safe sex life, the capability to reproduce and the freedom to decide if, when, and how often to do so. Men and women should be informed about and have access to safe, effective, affordable, and acceptable methods of family planning of their choice, and the right to appropriate health-care services that enable women to safely go through pregnancy and childbirth.