Syndecan-1 as a biomarker of endothelial glycocalyx injury in sepsis: a meta-analysis of associations with shock, organ complications and mortality.

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Dongling Xu, Chengshu Dong, Zifang Zhao, Siyuan Hou
{"title":"Syndecan-1 as a biomarker of endothelial glycocalyx injury in sepsis: a meta-analysis of associations with shock, organ complications and mortality.","authors":"Dongling Xu, Chengshu Dong, Zifang Zhao, Siyuan Hou","doi":"10.1093/postmj/qgag053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This meta-analysis aimed to assess syndecan-1 as a biomarker reflecting endothelial glycocalyx injury in sepsis, investigate its correlation with disease severity, organ complications and clinical prognosis, and clarifies its complementary value relative to conventional sepsis biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Data analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3, with standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated. Subgroup analyses were stratified by sepsis definitions (Sepsis 1.0/2.0 vs. 3.0), and sensitivity analyses were performed by excluding studies with serious or critical ROBINS-I bias.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>A total of 29 studies involving 4985 participants (3902 with sepsis) were included.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Circulating syndecan-1 levels in sepsis patients versus non-sepsis controls, survivors versus non-survivors, and patients with septic shock, acute kidney injury (AKI) and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Syndecan-1 levels were significantly higher in sepsis patients than non-sepsis [SMD = 1.16, 95% CI (0.86, 1.47), p < 0.00001]. Non-survivors had significantly elevated levels compared with survivors, and higher levels were also observed in patients with septic shock, AKI and DIC (all p < 0.00001). Subgroup analyses yielded consistent findings across different sepsis definitions, and sensitivity analyses excluding 9 high-bias studies confirmed the robustness of the results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elevated syndecan-1 indicates endothelial glycocalyx disruption in sepsis, and is closely linked to worse prognosis, septic shock and organ dysfunction. As a complementary biomarker to lactate, procalcitonin and C-reactive protein, it improves multi-domain sepsis risk stratification and supports individualized resuscitation and endothelial-protective intervention research. Key messages What is already known on this topic? Syndecan-1 is a marker of endothelial glycocalyx degradation and has been linked to sepsis severity. However, its precise association with prognosis and complications remains unclear, and its clinical value relative to traditional sepsis biomarkers (lactate/PCT/CRP) has not been systematically clarified, necessitating a meta-analysis to quantify its clinical relevance and complementary role. What this study adds This study confirms that syndecan-1 levels are significantly elevated in sepsis, especially in severe cases, non-survivors, and patients with AKI or DIC, validating its role as a specific biomarker of sepsis-associated endothelial glycocalyx injury. Importantly, it clarifies that syndecan-1 is not a replacement for traditional biomarkers but a complementary indicator that captures the endotheliopathy domain unmeasured by lactate/PCT/CRP. Its lack of specificity for sepsis limits its utility as a standalone diagnostic biomarker, but it provides incremental prognostic value for risk stratification. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy Syndecan-1 may serve as a prognostic marker for endothelial dysfunction in sepsis and a stratification tool for identifying patients at high risk of capillary leak and fluid resuscitation-related adverse outcomes. It should be used alongside other biomarkers to inform personalized resuscitation strategies. This meta-analysis provides the most comprehensive quantitative evidence to date for the integration of \"glycocalyx-friendly\" management into future sepsis research and clinical guidelines, and guides the design of forthcoming trials targeting endothelial barrier protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":20374,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":"867-875"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgag053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This meta-analysis aimed to assess syndecan-1 as a biomarker reflecting endothelial glycocalyx injury in sepsis, investigate its correlation with disease severity, organ complications and clinical prognosis, and clarifies its complementary value relative to conventional sepsis biomarkers.

Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Data analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3, with standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated. Subgroup analyses were stratified by sepsis definitions (Sepsis 1.0/2.0 vs. 3.0), and sensitivity analyses were performed by excluding studies with serious or critical ROBINS-I bias.

Patients: A total of 29 studies involving 4985 participants (3902 with sepsis) were included.

Main outcome measures: Circulating syndecan-1 levels in sepsis patients versus non-sepsis controls, survivors versus non-survivors, and patients with septic shock, acute kidney injury (AKI) and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).

Results: Syndecan-1 levels were significantly higher in sepsis patients than non-sepsis [SMD = 1.16, 95% CI (0.86, 1.47), p < 0.00001]. Non-survivors had significantly elevated levels compared with survivors, and higher levels were also observed in patients with septic shock, AKI and DIC (all p < 0.00001). Subgroup analyses yielded consistent findings across different sepsis definitions, and sensitivity analyses excluding 9 high-bias studies confirmed the robustness of the results.

Conclusion: Elevated syndecan-1 indicates endothelial glycocalyx disruption in sepsis, and is closely linked to worse prognosis, septic shock and organ dysfunction. As a complementary biomarker to lactate, procalcitonin and C-reactive protein, it improves multi-domain sepsis risk stratification and supports individualized resuscitation and endothelial-protective intervention research. Key messages What is already known on this topic? Syndecan-1 is a marker of endothelial glycocalyx degradation and has been linked to sepsis severity. However, its precise association with prognosis and complications remains unclear, and its clinical value relative to traditional sepsis biomarkers (lactate/PCT/CRP) has not been systematically clarified, necessitating a meta-analysis to quantify its clinical relevance and complementary role. What this study adds This study confirms that syndecan-1 levels are significantly elevated in sepsis, especially in severe cases, non-survivors, and patients with AKI or DIC, validating its role as a specific biomarker of sepsis-associated endothelial glycocalyx injury. Importantly, it clarifies that syndecan-1 is not a replacement for traditional biomarkers but a complementary indicator that captures the endotheliopathy domain unmeasured by lactate/PCT/CRP. Its lack of specificity for sepsis limits its utility as a standalone diagnostic biomarker, but it provides incremental prognostic value for risk stratification. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy Syndecan-1 may serve as a prognostic marker for endothelial dysfunction in sepsis and a stratification tool for identifying patients at high risk of capillary leak and fluid resuscitation-related adverse outcomes. It should be used alongside other biomarkers to inform personalized resuscitation strategies. This meta-analysis provides the most comprehensive quantitative evidence to date for the integration of "glycocalyx-friendly" management into future sepsis research and clinical guidelines, and guides the design of forthcoming trials targeting endothelial barrier protection.

Syndecan-1作为脓毒症中内皮糖萼损伤的生物标志物:与休克、器官并发症和死亡率相关的荟萃分析
目的:本荟萃分析旨在评估syndecan-1作为脓毒症中反映内皮糖杯损伤的生物标志物,探讨其与疾病严重程度、器官并发症和临床预后的相关性,并阐明其相对于传统脓毒症生物标志物的互补价值。设计:根据PRISMA指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。使用Review Manager 5.3进行数据分析,计算标准化平均差(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI)。根据脓毒症的定义(脓毒症1.0/2.0 vs. 3.0)对亚组分析进行分层,并通过排除严重或严重ROBINS-I偏倚的研究进行敏感性分析。患者:共纳入29项研究,涉及4985名参与者(3902名脓毒症患者)。主要结局指标:脓毒症患者与非脓毒症对照、幸存者与非幸存者、脓毒症休克、急性肾损伤(AKI)和弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)患者的循环syndecan-1水平。结果:脓毒症患者Syndecan-1水平明显高于非脓毒症患者[SMD = 1.16, 95% CI (0.86, 1.47), p]结论:脓毒症患者Syndecan-1水平升高提示内皮糖基破裂,与预后差、脓毒症休克及脏器功能障碍密切相关。作为乳酸、降钙素原和c反应蛋白的补充生物标志物,可改善多域脓毒症风险分层,支持个体化复苏和内皮保护干预研究。关于这个话题我们已经知道了什么?Syndecan-1是内皮糖萼降解的标志物,与脓毒症的严重程度有关。然而,其与预后和并发症的确切关系尚不清楚,其相对于传统脓毒症生物标志物(乳酸/PCT/CRP)的临床价值尚未系统阐明,需要荟萃分析来量化其临床相关性和补充作用。本研究证实了syndecan-1水平在脓毒症中显著升高,特别是在严重病例、非幸存者以及AKI或DIC患者中,验证了其作为脓毒症相关内皮糖盏损伤的特异性生物标志物的作用。重要的是,它澄清了syndecan-1不是传统生物标志物的替代品,而是捕获乳酸/PCT/CRP无法测量的内皮病变区域的补充指标。它对败血症缺乏特异性,限制了其作为独立诊断生物标志物的效用,但它为风险分层提供了增加的预后价值。Syndecan-1可作为脓毒症患者内皮功能障碍的预后标志物,并可作为鉴别毛细血管渗漏高风险患者和液体复苏相关不良后果的分层工具。它应该与其他生物标志物一起使用,为个性化复苏策略提供信息。这项荟萃分析提供了迄今为止最全面的定量证据,将“糖萼友好”管理纳入未来的败血症研究和临床指南,并指导即将进行的针对内皮屏障保护的试验设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Postgraduate Medical Journal
Postgraduate Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Postgraduate Medical Journal is a peer reviewed journal published on behalf of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. The journal aims to support junior doctors and their teachers and contribute to the continuing professional development of all doctors by publishing papers on a wide range of topics relevant to the practicing clinician and teacher. Papers published in PMJ include those that focus on core competencies; that describe current practice and new developments in all branches of medicine; that describe relevance and impact of translational research on clinical practice; that provide background relevant to examinations; and papers on medical education and medical education research. PMJ supports CPD by providing the opportunity for doctors to publish many types of articles including original clinical research; reviews; quality improvement reports; editorials, and correspondence on clinical matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书