Prospective Comparative Study on the Relationship Between Adverse Maternal and Fetal Outcomes and the Total Number of Antenatal Visits: Evaluating the Focused Antenatal Care Model and Assessment of Prenatal Care Utilization Index.

Q2 Medicine
Oman Medical Journal Pub Date : 2026-01-31 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.5001/omj.2025.109
Jesmitha Vijayan, Nitu Mishra, Aruna Kumar, Avani Ahuja
{"title":"Prospective Comparative Study on the Relationship Between Adverse Maternal and Fetal Outcomes and the Total Number of Antenatal Visits: Evaluating the Focused Antenatal Care Model and Assessment of Prenatal Care Utilization Index.","authors":"Jesmitha Vijayan, Nitu Mishra, Aruna Kumar, Avani Ahuja","doi":"10.5001/omj.2025.109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Antenatal care (ANC) visits during pregnancy aim to identify and address factors associated with unsafe pregnancy while educating pregnant women on the nuances of pregnancy and motherhood. The recommended number of visits varies across different countries. We compared the adverse maternal and fetal outcomes in participants with adequate ANC visits to the Focused ANC (FANC) model by the World Health Organization with those in the adequate and adequate plus categories of the Adequacy of the Prenatal Care Utilization (APNCU) index, to evaluate if the number of visits had any influence on these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective observational study among consenting participants who had received one or more antenatal visits elsewhere before presenting to our hospital for further care between January 2021 and September 2022. We collected details on previous pregnancy, prior ANC visits, adverse maternal, and fetal outcomes after delivery, and then statistically analyzed the data. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test, and the level of significance was set at <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05 with a confidence interval of 95%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 500 participants were included. Of these, 2.0%, 13.4%, 46.6%, and 38.0% received adequate plus, adequate, intermediate, and inadequate prenatal care, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between participants with adequate visits as per the FANC model and those with adequate and adequate plus visits as per the APNCU index in the distribution of high-risk factors in the index pregnancy, such as anemia, hypertensive disorder, and gestational diabetes mellitus. Similarly, statistically significant differences were found between adverse maternal outcomes like post-partum hemorrhage and intensive care unit admission, and adverse neonatal outcomes like preterm birth, low birth weight, birth asphyxia, neonatal hypoglycemia, meconium aspiration, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and stillbirth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the number of participants receiving adequate ANC based on the FANC model was greater than those in the adequate and adequate plus categories according to the APNCU index, the frequency of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes was higher in the FANC model. This most likely indicates that less frequent ANC visits are probably inadequate for the timely identification of issues of concern, and therefore for preventing adverse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19667,"journal":{"name":"Oman Medical Journal","volume":"41 1","pages":"e798"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13093137/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oman Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2025.109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Antenatal care (ANC) visits during pregnancy aim to identify and address factors associated with unsafe pregnancy while educating pregnant women on the nuances of pregnancy and motherhood. The recommended number of visits varies across different countries. We compared the adverse maternal and fetal outcomes in participants with adequate ANC visits to the Focused ANC (FANC) model by the World Health Organization with those in the adequate and adequate plus categories of the Adequacy of the Prenatal Care Utilization (APNCU) index, to evaluate if the number of visits had any influence on these outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study among consenting participants who had received one or more antenatal visits elsewhere before presenting to our hospital for further care between January 2021 and September 2022. We collected details on previous pregnancy, prior ANC visits, adverse maternal, and fetal outcomes after delivery, and then statistically analyzed the data. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test, and the level of significance was set at p ≤ 0.05 with a confidence interval of 95%.

Results: A total of 500 participants were included. Of these, 2.0%, 13.4%, 46.6%, and 38.0% received adequate plus, adequate, intermediate, and inadequate prenatal care, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between participants with adequate visits as per the FANC model and those with adequate and adequate plus visits as per the APNCU index in the distribution of high-risk factors in the index pregnancy, such as anemia, hypertensive disorder, and gestational diabetes mellitus. Similarly, statistically significant differences were found between adverse maternal outcomes like post-partum hemorrhage and intensive care unit admission, and adverse neonatal outcomes like preterm birth, low birth weight, birth asphyxia, neonatal hypoglycemia, meconium aspiration, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and stillbirth.

Conclusions: Although the number of participants receiving adequate ANC based on the FANC model was greater than those in the adequate and adequate plus categories according to the APNCU index, the frequency of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes was higher in the FANC model. This most likely indicates that less frequent ANC visits are probably inadequate for the timely identification of issues of concern, and therefore for preventing adverse outcomes.

产前检查次数与母胎不良结局关系的前瞻性比较研究:集中产前护理模式评估及产前护理利用指数评估
目的:怀孕期间产前保健(ANC)访问旨在确定和解决与不安全怀孕有关的因素,同时教育孕妇了解怀孕和做母亲的细微差别。不同国家的建议访问次数有所不同。我们比较了在世界卫生组织的集中产前护理(fnc)模型中进行充分产前护理访问的参与者与产前护理利用(APNCU)指数中适当和适当加类别的参与者的不良孕产妇和胎儿结局,以评估访问次数是否对这些结局有任何影响。方法:我们在同意的参与者中进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,这些参与者在2021年1月至2022年9月期间在其他地方接受了一次或多次产前检查,然后来到我们医院进行进一步护理。我们收集了既往妊娠、产前检查、产妇不良结局和分娩后胎儿结局的详细信息,然后对数据进行统计分析。分类变量分析采用卡方检验,显著性水平p≤0.05,置信区间为95%。结果:共纳入受试者500人。其中,2.0%、13.4%、46.6%和38.0%分别接受了适当的加、适当的、中等的和不充分的产前护理。在指标妊娠的高危因素,如贫血、高血压疾病、妊娠期糖尿病的分布上,根据fnc模型就诊次数充足的受试者与根据APNCU指数就诊次数充足和额外充足的受试者之间存在统计学差异。同样,产后出血和入住重症监护病房等孕产妇不良结局与早产、低出生体重、出生窒息、新生儿低血糖、胎吸、新生儿入住重症监护病房和死胎等新生儿不良结局之间也存在统计学上的显著差异。结论:尽管根据APNCU指数,基于FANC模型接受充足ANC的参与者人数大于充足和充足加类别的参与者,但在FANC模型中,不良母婴结局的发生率更高。这很可能表明,不太频繁的非国大访问可能不足以及时查明关切的问题,从而防止不良后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oman Medical Journal
Oman Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
119
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书