Effectiveness of nicotine vape products (E-cigarettes) as a smoking cessation aid for US adults: a narrative review of findings from the population assessment of tobacco and health study.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Shu Xu, Jianan Zhu, Yuxin Zhang, Jennifer Hill, Yang Feng, David Abrams, Raymond S Niaura
{"title":"Effectiveness of nicotine vape products (E-cigarettes) as a smoking cessation aid for US adults: a narrative review of findings from the population assessment of tobacco and health study.","authors":"Shu Xu, Jianan Zhu, Yuxin Zhang, Jennifer Hill, Yang Feng, David Abrams, Raymond S Niaura","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntag068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Controversy remains regarding whether nicotine vaping products (NVPs) are associated with cigarette cessation in observational research. Reviews have largely overlooked studies using the same data source. To address this gap, we conducted a narrative review to examine the heterogeneity in the reported association that used data from the same source, which may help to explain inconsistent findings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified empirical studies through PubMed and Google searches that exclusively used the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study data to examine associations between NVP use and smoking cessation among adults. Adapting Arksey and O'Malley's approach, we extracted and summarized key study characteristics, including inclusion criteria, participant characteristics, study durations, definitions of NPV exposure and smoking outcomes, covariate adjustment, and analytic methods. We also conducted regression and regression tree analyses to examine how these characteristics were related to study findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 28 articles comprising 38 analyses of NVP use and cigarette cessation. Of these, 24 studies (63.2%) reported a positive association, concluding that NVP use predicted cessation. Substantial heterogeneity existed across study characteristics. Evidence suggests that daily NVP use may promote cessation, whereas studies restricted to participants with an intention to quit were less likely to observe cessation than those including participants regardless of quit intention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Researchers are advised against making broad claims based on any single PATH Study analysis of NVP use and smoking cessation. Rather, multiple studies using the same data source must be carefully examined in order to synthesize evidence and assess consistency of the findings.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Whether NVPs help adult smokers quit remains controversial in observational research, partly due to heterogeneity in study characteristics across studies using the same data source. Our review of observational studies based exclusively on a single data source-an approach often overlooked-suggests that (1) daily NVP use may support smoking cessation, and (2) studies that restricted participants to those with an intention to quit were less likely to observe cessation than studies that included participants regardless of quit intention. These findings underscore the value of multiple analyses using the same data source to synthesize evidence and assess consistency.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntag068","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Controversy remains regarding whether nicotine vaping products (NVPs) are associated with cigarette cessation in observational research. Reviews have largely overlooked studies using the same data source. To address this gap, we conducted a narrative review to examine the heterogeneity in the reported association that used data from the same source, which may help to explain inconsistent findings.

Methods: We identified empirical studies through PubMed and Google searches that exclusively used the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study data to examine associations between NVP use and smoking cessation among adults. Adapting Arksey and O'Malley's approach, we extracted and summarized key study characteristics, including inclusion criteria, participant characteristics, study durations, definitions of NPV exposure and smoking outcomes, covariate adjustment, and analytic methods. We also conducted regression and regression tree analyses to examine how these characteristics were related to study findings.

Results: We identified 28 articles comprising 38 analyses of NVP use and cigarette cessation. Of these, 24 studies (63.2%) reported a positive association, concluding that NVP use predicted cessation. Substantial heterogeneity existed across study characteristics. Evidence suggests that daily NVP use may promote cessation, whereas studies restricted to participants with an intention to quit were less likely to observe cessation than those including participants regardless of quit intention.

Conclusions: Researchers are advised against making broad claims based on any single PATH Study analysis of NVP use and smoking cessation. Rather, multiple studies using the same data source must be carefully examined in order to synthesize evidence and assess consistency of the findings.

Implications: Whether NVPs help adult smokers quit remains controversial in observational research, partly due to heterogeneity in study characteristics across studies using the same data source. Our review of observational studies based exclusively on a single data source-an approach often overlooked-suggests that (1) daily NVP use may support smoking cessation, and (2) studies that restricted participants to those with an intention to quit were less likely to observe cessation than studies that included participants regardless of quit intention. These findings underscore the value of multiple analyses using the same data source to synthesize evidence and assess consistency.

尼古丁vape产品(电子烟)作为美国成年人戒烟辅助工具的有效性:烟草与健康研究人口评估结果的叙述性回顾。
导读:在观察性研究中,关于尼古丁电子烟产品(NVPs)是否与戒烟有关的争议仍然存在。评论在很大程度上忽略了使用相同数据源的研究。为了解决这一差距,我们进行了一项叙述性回顾,以检查使用同一来源数据的报告关联中的异质性,这可能有助于解释不一致的发现。方法:我们通过PubMed和谷歌检索确定了专门使用烟草与健康人口评估(PATH)研究数据的实证研究,以检查成人使用NVP与戒烟之间的关系。采用Arksey和O'Malley的方法,我们提取并总结了关键研究特征,包括纳入标准、参与者特征、研究持续时间、NPV暴露和吸烟结果的定义、协变量调整和分析方法。我们还进行了回归和回归树分析,以检验这些特征与研究结果之间的关系。结果:我们确定了28篇文章,包括38篇NVP使用和戒烟的分析。其中,24项研究(63.2%)报告了正相关,结论是使用NVP可以预测戒烟。研究特征之间存在大量异质性。有证据表明,每天使用NVP可能会促进戒烟,而仅限于有戒烟意图的参与者的研究比那些不考虑戒烟意图的参与者更不可能观察到戒烟。结论:建议研究人员不要根据任何单一的PATH研究对NVP使用和戒烟的分析作出广泛的主张。相反,必须仔细检查使用相同数据源的多项研究,以便综合证据并评估结果的一致性。提示:在观察性研究中,NVPs是否有助于成年吸烟者戒烟仍存在争议,部分原因是使用相同数据源的研究的研究特征存在异质性。我们对仅基于单一数据源的观察性研究的回顾-一种经常被忽视的方法-表明:(1)每天使用NVP可能有助于戒烟,(2)将参与者限制为有戒烟意图的研究比不考虑戒烟意图的研究更不可能观察到戒烟。这些发现强调了使用相同数据源进行多重分析以综合证据和评估一致性的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书