Using Selective Agar Containing Ciprofloxacin and Tetracycline Reveals Resistant Oral Microbiota in Healthy and Periodontitis Patients.

IF 4.6 3区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Marietta Wolf, Jennifer Metz, Annette Wittmer, Klaus Pelz, Kirstin Vach, Christiane von Ohle, Diana Wolff, Cornelia Frese, Fabian Cieplik, Ali Al-Ahmad
{"title":"Using Selective Agar Containing Ciprofloxacin and Tetracycline Reveals Resistant Oral Microbiota in Healthy and Periodontitis Patients.","authors":"Marietta Wolf, Jennifer Metz, Annette Wittmer, Klaus Pelz, Kirstin Vach, Christiane von Ohle, Diana Wolff, Cornelia Frese, Fabian Cieplik, Ali Al-Ahmad","doi":"10.1002/mbo3.70298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The oral cavity may act as a reservoir for antibiotic resistance. This study aimed to directly isolate and identify phenotypically resistant bacteria from the oral biofilm of healthy individuals and patients with periodontitis, using tetracycline, and ciprofloxacin containing selective agar. Furthermore, resistance of selected bacteria towards ampicillin was also evaluated. Plaque samples were collected from 12 patients (six healthy, six with periodontitis). Bacteria were cultured on selective agar containg defined antibiotic concentration and non-selective media under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, identified by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and 16S rDNA sequencing. The selected bacteria were subsequently tested for susceptibility using disk diffusion, E-test, and β-lactamase assay. 495 strains representing 106 species were isolated, including 54 aerobes/facultative anaerobes and 52 obligate anaerobes. Antibiotic resistance was observed in all subjects: 15.2% of isolates were resistant to tetracycline, 32.9% to ciprofloxacin, and 0.6% to ampicillin, with no significant differences between healthy and periodontitis groups. Tetracycline resistance was most frequent in the Streptococcus mitis group and Eubacterium spp., while ciprofloxacin resistance was dominated by Actinomyces-Schaalia group. Concluding, prevalence of antibiotic-resistance was comparable between healthy and periodontitis patients. Resistance was most prevalent against ciprofloxacin and tetracycline, highlighting the oral cavity as a relevant reservoir for antibiotic resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":18573,"journal":{"name":"MicrobiologyOpen","volume":"15 2","pages":"e70298"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13106226/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MicrobiologyOpen","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.70298","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The oral cavity may act as a reservoir for antibiotic resistance. This study aimed to directly isolate and identify phenotypically resistant bacteria from the oral biofilm of healthy individuals and patients with periodontitis, using tetracycline, and ciprofloxacin containing selective agar. Furthermore, resistance of selected bacteria towards ampicillin was also evaluated. Plaque samples were collected from 12 patients (six healthy, six with periodontitis). Bacteria were cultured on selective agar containg defined antibiotic concentration and non-selective media under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, identified by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and 16S rDNA sequencing. The selected bacteria were subsequently tested for susceptibility using disk diffusion, E-test, and β-lactamase assay. 495 strains representing 106 species were isolated, including 54 aerobes/facultative anaerobes and 52 obligate anaerobes. Antibiotic resistance was observed in all subjects: 15.2% of isolates were resistant to tetracycline, 32.9% to ciprofloxacin, and 0.6% to ampicillin, with no significant differences between healthy and periodontitis groups. Tetracycline resistance was most frequent in the Streptococcus mitis group and Eubacterium spp., while ciprofloxacin resistance was dominated by Actinomyces-Schaalia group. Concluding, prevalence of antibiotic-resistance was comparable between healthy and periodontitis patients. Resistance was most prevalent against ciprofloxacin and tetracycline, highlighting the oral cavity as a relevant reservoir for antibiotic resistance.

使用含有环丙沙星和四环素的选择性琼脂揭示健康和牙周炎患者的耐药口腔微生物群。
口腔可能是抗生素耐药性的储存库。本研究旨在使用含有选择性琼脂的四环素和环丙沙星,从健康个体和牙周炎患者的口腔生物膜中直接分离和鉴定表型耐药细菌。此外,还评估了所选细菌对氨苄西林的耐药性。从12例患者(6例健康患者,6例牙周炎患者)中采集菌斑样本。将细菌分别培养在含有特定抗生素浓度的选择性琼脂和非选择性培养基上,在好氧和厌氧条件下进行培养,通过MALDI-TOF质谱和16S rDNA测序进行鉴定。随后采用纸片扩散法、e试验和β-内酰胺酶试验对所选细菌进行药敏试验。共分离到106种495株,其中需氧/兼性厌氧菌54株,专性厌氧菌52株。所有受试者均观察到抗生素耐药性:15.2%的分离株对四环素耐药,32.9%对环丙沙星耐药,0.6%对氨苄西林耐药,健康组和牙周炎组之间无显著差异。对四环素的耐药以链球菌组和真杆菌组最为常见,对环丙沙星的耐药以放线菌-沙利亚菌组为主。综上所述,健康患者和牙周炎患者的抗生素耐药率相当。对环丙沙星和四环素的耐药性最为普遍,这表明口腔是抗生素耐药性的相关储存库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MicrobiologyOpen
MicrobiologyOpen MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: MicrobiologyOpen is a peer reviewed, fully open access, broad-scope, and interdisciplinary journal delivering rapid decisions and fast publication of microbial science, a field which is undergoing a profound and exciting evolution in this post-genomic era. The journal aims to serve the research community by providing a vehicle for authors wishing to publish quality research in both fundamental and applied microbiology. Our goal is to publish articles that stimulate discussion and debate, as well as add to our knowledge base and further the understanding of microbial interactions and microbial processes. MicrobiologyOpen gives prompt and equal consideration to articles reporting theoretical, experimental, applied, and descriptive work in all aspects of bacteriology, virology, mycology and protistology, including, but not limited to: - agriculture - antimicrobial resistance - astrobiology - biochemistry - biotechnology - cell and molecular biology - clinical microbiology - computational, systems, and synthetic microbiology - environmental science - evolutionary biology, ecology, and systematics - food science and technology - genetics and genomics - geobiology and earth science - host-microbe interactions - infectious diseases - natural products discovery - pharmaceutical and medicinal chemistry - physiology - plant pathology - veterinary microbiology We will consider submissions across unicellular and cell-cluster organisms: prokaryotes (bacteria, archaea) and eukaryotes (fungi, protists, microalgae, lichens), as well as viruses and prions infecting or interacting with microorganisms, plants and animals, including genetic, biochemical, biophysical, bioinformatic and structural analyses. The journal features Original Articles (including full Research articles, Method articles, and Short Communications), Commentaries, Reviews, and Editorials. Original papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the article. We also support confirmatory research and aim to work with authors to meet reviewer expectations. MicrobiologyOpen publishes articles submitted directly to the journal and those referred from other Wiley journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书