Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus in Wild Animals: A Global Scoping Review.

IF 4.6 3区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Yahye Ahmed Nageye, Abdirasak Sharif Ali Mude, Kizito Eneye Bello
{"title":"Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus in Wild Animals: A Global Scoping Review.","authors":"Yahye Ahmed Nageye, Abdirasak Sharif Ali Mude, Kizito Eneye Bello","doi":"10.1002/mbo3.70292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antimicrobial resistance is a global One Health concern, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) remains one of the clinically important resistant bacterial groups. Although VRE has been extensively studied in clinical and livestock settings, it has been investigated far less often in free-ranging wild animals. This scoping review maps the published evidence on VRE in wild animals, with emphasis on reported prevalence, host and environmental correlates, anthropogenic exposures, and laboratory detection methods rather than quantifying pooled effect sizes. A structured search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was conducted from database inception to the final search stage used for this review, with only peer-reviewed English-language primary studies contributing empirical wildlife VRE data included in the synthesis. Eligibility was guided by the Population-Concept-Context framework, and the mapped evidence included mammals plus one reptile study retained in the review scope. Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. Most were conducted in Europe, with substantially fewer studies from Africa and South America, indicating major geographical gaps. Reported prevalence ranged from 1.08% in feral pigs in Brazil to 100% in wild rabbits in Spain, although several striking estimates were based on very small samples and should be interpreted cautiously. Culture-based methods were most frequently used, whereas PCR-based approaches were particularly useful for confirming resistance genes. Overall, the evidence suggests that wild animals can act as reservoirs or sentinels of VRE exposure in anthropogenically influenced environments. Standardized surveillance, clearer reporting, and broader One Health monitoring that explicitly includes wildlife are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":18573,"journal":{"name":"MicrobiologyOpen","volume":"15 2","pages":"e70292"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13102680/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MicrobiologyOpen","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.70292","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance is a global One Health concern, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) remains one of the clinically important resistant bacterial groups. Although VRE has been extensively studied in clinical and livestock settings, it has been investigated far less often in free-ranging wild animals. This scoping review maps the published evidence on VRE in wild animals, with emphasis on reported prevalence, host and environmental correlates, anthropogenic exposures, and laboratory detection methods rather than quantifying pooled effect sizes. A structured search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was conducted from database inception to the final search stage used for this review, with only peer-reviewed English-language primary studies contributing empirical wildlife VRE data included in the synthesis. Eligibility was guided by the Population-Concept-Context framework, and the mapped evidence included mammals plus one reptile study retained in the review scope. Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. Most were conducted in Europe, with substantially fewer studies from Africa and South America, indicating major geographical gaps. Reported prevalence ranged from 1.08% in feral pigs in Brazil to 100% in wild rabbits in Spain, although several striking estimates were based on very small samples and should be interpreted cautiously. Culture-based methods were most frequently used, whereas PCR-based approaches were particularly useful for confirming resistance genes. Overall, the evidence suggests that wild animals can act as reservoirs or sentinels of VRE exposure in anthropogenically influenced environments. Standardized surveillance, clearer reporting, and broader One Health monitoring that explicitly includes wildlife are needed.

野生动物中万古霉素耐药肠球菌:全球范围综述。
抗菌素耐药性是全球关注的一个健康问题,耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)仍然是临床上重要的耐药细菌群之一。尽管VRE已在临床和牲畜环境中进行了广泛研究,但在自由放养的野生动物中进行的调查要少得多。这一范围审查绘制了关于野生动物VRE的已发表证据图,重点是报告的流行率、宿主和环境相关性、人为暴露和实验室检测方法,而不是量化综合效应大小。对PubMed、ScienceDirect、Scopus、Web of Science和谷歌Scholar进行了结构化搜索,从数据库建立到最后的搜索阶段用于本综述,只有经过同行评审的英语初级研究提供了经验野生动物VRE数据,才包括在综合中。通过种群-概念-背景框架指导入选资格,绘制的证据包括哺乳动物和一项保留在审查范围内的爬行动物研究。25项研究符合纳入标准。大多数研究是在欧洲进行的,非洲和南美洲的研究少得多,这表明存在很大的地理差距。报告的流行率从巴西野猪的1.08%到西班牙野兔的100%不等,尽管几个惊人的估计是基于非常小的样本,应谨慎解释。最常用的是基于培养的方法,而基于pcr的方法在确认抗性基因方面特别有用。总体而言,有证据表明,在受人为影响的环境中,野生动物可以充当VRE暴露的储存库或哨兵。标准化的监测、更清晰的报告和明确包括野生动物在内的更广泛的“同一个健康”监测是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MicrobiologyOpen
MicrobiologyOpen MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: MicrobiologyOpen is a peer reviewed, fully open access, broad-scope, and interdisciplinary journal delivering rapid decisions and fast publication of microbial science, a field which is undergoing a profound and exciting evolution in this post-genomic era. The journal aims to serve the research community by providing a vehicle for authors wishing to publish quality research in both fundamental and applied microbiology. Our goal is to publish articles that stimulate discussion and debate, as well as add to our knowledge base and further the understanding of microbial interactions and microbial processes. MicrobiologyOpen gives prompt and equal consideration to articles reporting theoretical, experimental, applied, and descriptive work in all aspects of bacteriology, virology, mycology and protistology, including, but not limited to: - agriculture - antimicrobial resistance - astrobiology - biochemistry - biotechnology - cell and molecular biology - clinical microbiology - computational, systems, and synthetic microbiology - environmental science - evolutionary biology, ecology, and systematics - food science and technology - genetics and genomics - geobiology and earth science - host-microbe interactions - infectious diseases - natural products discovery - pharmaceutical and medicinal chemistry - physiology - plant pathology - veterinary microbiology We will consider submissions across unicellular and cell-cluster organisms: prokaryotes (bacteria, archaea) and eukaryotes (fungi, protists, microalgae, lichens), as well as viruses and prions infecting or interacting with microorganisms, plants and animals, including genetic, biochemical, biophysical, bioinformatic and structural analyses. The journal features Original Articles (including full Research articles, Method articles, and Short Communications), Commentaries, Reviews, and Editorials. Original papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the article. We also support confirmatory research and aim to work with authors to meet reviewer expectations. MicrobiologyOpen publishes articles submitted directly to the journal and those referred from other Wiley journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书