Community Perception of Abortions in Different Districts of Nepal.

Q3 Medicine
Suruchi Shahi, Sanju Maharjan, Manish Gautam, Kriti Lamichhane, Parash Prasad Phuyal, Bhogendra Dotel, Sujan Karki
{"title":"Community Perception of Abortions in Different Districts of Nepal.","authors":"Suruchi Shahi, Sanju Maharjan, Manish Gautam, Kriti Lamichhane, Parash Prasad Phuyal, Bhogendra Dotel, Sujan Karki","doi":"10.33314/jnhrc.v23i04.4846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Abortion remains a significant public health concern in Nepal, contributing to maternal mortality and posing a complex challenge to women's reproductive health. This study explores the complex nature of community perceptions regarding attitudes and perceptions on abortion, perceived factors influencing abortion, perceived consequences of abortion, and existing modern and traditional practices of abortion in Nepal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted across 12 districts in Nepal, involving 228 community members, including community healers, Female Community Health Volunteers, women leaders, in-laws, and men. Data was analyzed by applying a thematic analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings highlighted a dichotomy in knowledge of abortion, encompassing both progressive views (considering it a women's right) and regressive notions (viewing it as a sin). Participants also recognized the positive aspects of abortion, such as its role in reducing maternal mortality ratios and improving child health. The study identified factors influencing abortion decisions like the desire to limit family size, entrenched gender dynamics with strong son preference, and pregnancies resulting from relationships outside marriage. Furthermore, abortion was also perceived as a solution for pregnancies arising from rape, incest, or with fetal disabilities. Participants shared a range of consequences associated with abortion, including prevalent misconceptions. They indicated that modern abortion practices like the use of abortion pills were on the rise compared to traditional methods. Nevertheless, unsafe self-medication remained a concern, particularly among rural women.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To address these challenges effectively, it is imperative to understand the underlying reasons behind these perceptions and develop targeted interventions that enhance women's access to safe abortion in Nepal.</p>","PeriodicalId":16380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","volume":"23 4","pages":"704-709"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v23i04.4846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Abortion remains a significant public health concern in Nepal, contributing to maternal mortality and posing a complex challenge to women's reproductive health. This study explores the complex nature of community perceptions regarding attitudes and perceptions on abortion, perceived factors influencing abortion, perceived consequences of abortion, and existing modern and traditional practices of abortion in Nepal.

Methods: A qualitative study was conducted across 12 districts in Nepal, involving 228 community members, including community healers, Female Community Health Volunteers, women leaders, in-laws, and men. Data was analyzed by applying a thematic analysis approach.

Results: Findings highlighted a dichotomy in knowledge of abortion, encompassing both progressive views (considering it a women's right) and regressive notions (viewing it as a sin). Participants also recognized the positive aspects of abortion, such as its role in reducing maternal mortality ratios and improving child health. The study identified factors influencing abortion decisions like the desire to limit family size, entrenched gender dynamics with strong son preference, and pregnancies resulting from relationships outside marriage. Furthermore, abortion was also perceived as a solution for pregnancies arising from rape, incest, or with fetal disabilities. Participants shared a range of consequences associated with abortion, including prevalent misconceptions. They indicated that modern abortion practices like the use of abortion pills were on the rise compared to traditional methods. Nevertheless, unsafe self-medication remained a concern, particularly among rural women.

Conclusions: To address these challenges effectively, it is imperative to understand the underlying reasons behind these perceptions and develop targeted interventions that enhance women's access to safe abortion in Nepal.

尼泊尔不同地区社区对堕胎的看法。
背景:在尼泊尔,堕胎仍然是一个重大的公共卫生问题,导致孕产妇死亡,并对妇女生殖健康构成复杂的挑战。本研究探讨了社区对堕胎的态度和看法、影响堕胎的感知因素、感知到的堕胎后果以及尼泊尔现有的现代和传统堕胎做法的复杂性。方法:在尼泊尔的12个地区进行了一项定性研究,涉及228名社区成员,包括社区治疗师、女性社区卫生志愿者、女性领导人、姻亲和男性。采用专题分析方法对数据进行分析。结果:调查结果强调了对堕胎的认识的二分法,包括进步的观点(认为这是妇女的权利)和倒退的观点(认为这是一种罪恶)。与会者还认识到堕胎的积极方面,例如它在降低产妇死亡率和改善儿童健康方面的作用。该研究确定了影响堕胎决定的因素,如限制家庭规模的愿望,强烈的重男轻女的根深蒂固的性别动态,以及婚外关系导致的怀孕。此外,堕胎也被认为是因强奸、乱伦或胎儿残疾而怀孕的一种解决办法。参与者分享了一系列与堕胎有关的后果,包括普遍存在的误解。他们指出,与传统方法相比,使用堕胎药等现代堕胎做法正在上升。然而,不安全的自我药疗仍然是一个令人关切的问题,特别是在农村妇女中。结论:为了有效应对这些挑战,必须了解这些观念背后的潜在原因,并制定有针对性的干预措施,以提高尼泊尔妇女获得安全堕胎的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes articles related to researches done in the field of biomedical sciences related to all the discipline of the medical sciences, medical education, public health, health care management, including ethical and social issues pertaining to health. The journal gives preference to clinically oriented studies over experimental and animal studies. The Journal would publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Editorial, Guest Editorial, Viewpoint and letter to the editor are solicited by the editorial board. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding manuscript submission and processing at JNHRC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书