L F Böswald, A Zeyner, M M Santo, M Wensch-Dorendorf, A Sünder, B Popper, W Siegert
{"title":"Feeding Laboratory Mice: Comparing a Standard Versus a Purified Diet - Marked Effects on Digestive Physiology.","authors":"L F Böswald, A Zeyner, M M Santo, M Wensch-Dorendorf, A Sünder, B Popper, W Siegert","doi":"10.1111/jpn.70063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diet composition and processing have a major impact on its utilisation by the animal, as is known from farm and pet animal species. This includes effects on energy and nutrient digestibility, the intermediary metabolism, and the intestinal microbiome, with all the resulting impacts. For laboratory animals, data is scarce on influencing factors on diet digestibility. In experiments using special diets, either standard diets are used for the control group, or purified control diets. The aim of the present study was to compare a standard diet and a purified control diet (both pelleted) fed ad libitum to C57BL/6J mice and to investigate the potential effect on body weight development, feed conversion, energy and nutrient digestibility and indicators of intestinal fermentation (pH, short-chain fatty acids). Thus, 21 mice each were fed the standard diet (STD) and the purified diet (PD). Results showed a significantly higher apparent digestibility of gross energy and the crude nutrients in group PD (p < 0.001). The weight of the filled cecum and colon was significantly lower in group PD than STD (p < 0.001; p < 0.01). The pH of ingesta was significantly higher in stomach, cecum and colon of group PD (p < 0.0001), likely influenced by the significantly lower concentration of total short-chain fatty acids measures in cecum and colon of PD mice. The high apparent digestibility of the PD implied a lower influx of fermentable substrate into the hindgut, resulting in lower concentrations of microbial metabolites and altered pH milieu.</p>","PeriodicalId":14942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.70063","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Diet composition and processing have a major impact on its utilisation by the animal, as is known from farm and pet animal species. This includes effects on energy and nutrient digestibility, the intermediary metabolism, and the intestinal microbiome, with all the resulting impacts. For laboratory animals, data is scarce on influencing factors on diet digestibility. In experiments using special diets, either standard diets are used for the control group, or purified control diets. The aim of the present study was to compare a standard diet and a purified control diet (both pelleted) fed ad libitum to C57BL/6J mice and to investigate the potential effect on body weight development, feed conversion, energy and nutrient digestibility and indicators of intestinal fermentation (pH, short-chain fatty acids). Thus, 21 mice each were fed the standard diet (STD) and the purified diet (PD). Results showed a significantly higher apparent digestibility of gross energy and the crude nutrients in group PD (p < 0.001). The weight of the filled cecum and colon was significantly lower in group PD than STD (p < 0.001; p < 0.01). The pH of ingesta was significantly higher in stomach, cecum and colon of group PD (p < 0.0001), likely influenced by the significantly lower concentration of total short-chain fatty acids measures in cecum and colon of PD mice. The high apparent digestibility of the PD implied a lower influx of fermentable substrate into the hindgut, resulting in lower concentrations of microbial metabolites and altered pH milieu.
期刊介绍:
As an international forum for hypothesis-driven scientific research, the Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition publishes original papers in the fields of animal physiology, biochemistry and physiology of nutrition, animal nutrition, feed technology and preservation (only when related to animal nutrition). Well-conducted scientific work that meets the technical and ethical standards is considered only on the basis of scientific rigor.
Research on farm and companion animals is preferred. Comparative work on exotic species is welcome too. Pharmacological or toxicological experiments with a direct reference to nutrition are also considered. Manuscripts on fish and other aquatic non-mammals with topics on growth or nutrition will not be accepted. Manuscripts may be rejected on the grounds that the subject is too specialized or that the contribution they make to animal physiology and nutrition is insufficient.
In addition, reviews on topics of current interest within the scope of the journal are welcome. Authors are advised to send an outline to the Editorial Office for approval prior to submission.