Inequities in Dementia Diagnosis: Evidence From the ELSI-Brazil Study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Andrew Christopher Claro Miguel, Lucas Martins-Teixeira, Carolina Godoy, Gustavo Melo de Andrade Lima, Maria Fernanda Lima-Costa, Matheus Ghossain Barbosa, Cleusa Pinheiro Ferri
{"title":"Inequities in Dementia Diagnosis: Evidence From the ELSI-Brazil Study.","authors":"Andrew Christopher Claro Miguel, Lucas Martins-Teixeira, Carolina Godoy, Gustavo Melo de Andrade Lima, Maria Fernanda Lima-Costa, Matheus Ghossain Barbosa, Cleusa Pinheiro Ferri","doi":"10.1002/gps.70219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the national proportion of undiagnosed dementia cases in Brazil, examine its distribution across Brazilian regions sociodemographic subgroups, and identify factors associated with receiving a diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional, population-based analysis using baseline data (2015-2016) from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSI-Brazil), a nationally representative survey of community-dwelling adults. Dementia was identified through an established algorithm incorporating cognitive testing and functional impairment, combined with self-reported medical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Underdiagnosis was defined as meeting dementia criteria without a prior medical diagnosis. Sociodemographic, clinical, cognitive, and functional variables were assessed. Survey-weighted logistic regression models estimated factors associated with underdiagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 5249 participants aged ≥ 60 years, 392 met criteria for dementia. Overall, 83.1% (95% CI: 76.5-88.1) had no previous diagnosis. Underdiagnosis was more frequent in poorer regions (90.2%) than in richer regions (76.0%), and higher among illiterate individuals (93.9%). In fully adjusted models, older age (OR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.85-0.97), more years of education (OR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.76-0.96), a higher number of chronic conditions (OR = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.54-0.97), and better memory performance (OR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.56-0.84) were associated with a lower likelihood of underdiagnosis, while living alone was associated with a higher likelihood of underdiagnosis (OR = 3.65 [1.05-12.6]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>About four in five older Brazilians meeting dementia criteria had no prior clinical diagnosis, with marked sociodemographic and regional disparities. Both individual factors-such as age, education, and multimorbidity-and structural inequities across regions influenced diagnostic likelihood. Strengthening early-detection strategies, improved health professional training, and regionally tailored approaches may improve recognition of dementia in Brazil's public health system.</p>","PeriodicalId":14060,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"41 4","pages":"e70219"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13110098/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.70219","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the national proportion of undiagnosed dementia cases in Brazil, examine its distribution across Brazilian regions sociodemographic subgroups, and identify factors associated with receiving a diagnosis.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, population-based analysis using baseline data (2015-2016) from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSI-Brazil), a nationally representative survey of community-dwelling adults. Dementia was identified through an established algorithm incorporating cognitive testing and functional impairment, combined with self-reported medical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Underdiagnosis was defined as meeting dementia criteria without a prior medical diagnosis. Sociodemographic, clinical, cognitive, and functional variables were assessed. Survey-weighted logistic regression models estimated factors associated with underdiagnosis.

Results: Among 5249 participants aged ≥ 60 years, 392 met criteria for dementia. Overall, 83.1% (95% CI: 76.5-88.1) had no previous diagnosis. Underdiagnosis was more frequent in poorer regions (90.2%) than in richer regions (76.0%), and higher among illiterate individuals (93.9%). In fully adjusted models, older age (OR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.85-0.97), more years of education (OR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.76-0.96), a higher number of chronic conditions (OR = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.54-0.97), and better memory performance (OR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.56-0.84) were associated with a lower likelihood of underdiagnosis, while living alone was associated with a higher likelihood of underdiagnosis (OR = 3.65 [1.05-12.6]).

Conclusions: About four in five older Brazilians meeting dementia criteria had no prior clinical diagnosis, with marked sociodemographic and regional disparities. Both individual factors-such as age, education, and multimorbidity-and structural inequities across regions influenced diagnostic likelihood. Strengthening early-detection strategies, improved health professional training, and regionally tailored approaches may improve recognition of dementia in Brazil's public health system.

痴呆诊断的不公平:来自elsi -巴西研究的证据。
目的:估计巴西未确诊痴呆病例的全国比例,检查其在巴西地区社会人口亚组中的分布,并确定与接受诊断相关的因素。方法:我们使用巴西老龄化纵向研究(ELSI-Brazil)的基线数据(2015-2016年)进行了一项基于人群的横断面分析,这是一项全国代表性的社区居住成年人调查。痴呆症是通过一种结合认知测试和功能损伤的既定算法,结合阿尔茨海默病的自我报告医学诊断来确定的。诊断不足被定义为在没有事先医学诊断的情况下符合痴呆标准。评估社会人口学、临床、认知和功能变量。调查加权逻辑回归模型估计了与诊断不足相关的因素。结果:5249名年龄≥60岁的参与者中,392名符合痴呆标准。总体而言,83.1% (95% CI: 76.5-88.1)患者以前没有诊断。较贫困地区的诊断不足发生率(90.2%)高于较富裕地区(76.0%),文盲人群的诊断不足发生率更高(93.9%)。在完全调整后的模型中,年龄较大(OR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.85-0.97)、受教育年限较长(OR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.76-0.96)、慢性病数量较多(OR = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.54-0.97)和记忆力较好(OR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.56-0.84)与较低的诊断不足可能性相关,而独居与较高的诊断不足可能性相关(OR = 3.65[1.05-12.6])。结论:在符合痴呆标准的巴西老年人中,约有五分之四没有先前的临床诊断,存在明显的社会人口统计学和地区差异。个体因素(如年龄、教育程度和多发病)和跨地区的结构不平等都影响诊断的可能性。加强早期发现策略,改进卫生专业培训和区域定制方法可能会提高巴西公共卫生系统对痴呆症的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.50%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The rapidly increasing world population of aged people has led to a growing need to focus attention on the problems of mental disorder in late life. The aim of the Journal is to communicate the results of original research in the causes, treatment and care of all forms of mental disorder which affect the elderly. The Journal is of interest to psychiatrists, psychologists, social scientists, nurses and others engaged in therapeutic professions, together with general neurobiological researchers. The Journal provides an international perspective on the important issue of geriatric psychiatry, and contributions are published from countries throughout the world. Topics covered include epidemiology of mental disorders in old age, clinical aetiological research, post-mortem pathological and neurochemical studies, treatment trials and evaluation of geriatric psychiatry services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书