Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of medication safety recommendations: focus groups with stakeholders.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Mirthe A M Oude Lansink, Marcia Vervloet, Lise van Tholen, Marloes Dankers, Mette Heringa, Bart J F van den Bemt, Liset van Dijk, Victor J B Huiskes
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of medication safety recommendations: focus groups with stakeholders.","authors":"Mirthe A M Oude Lansink, Marcia Vervloet, Lise van Tholen, Marloes Dankers, Mette Heringa, Bart J F van den Bemt, Liset van Dijk, Victor J B Huiskes","doi":"10.1007/s11096-026-02141-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multiple medication safety recommendations to reduce preventable medication-related hospitalisations have been introduced in the Netherlands. Still, these hospitalisations remain prevalent. This might be due to suboptimal implementation in clinical practice. Therefore, more insight is needed into barriers and facilitators for the implementation of these medication safety recommendations across healthcare sectors.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators for implementing medication safety recommendations across healthcare sectors from the perspective of various stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A selection of 17 Dutch medication safety recommendations targeting medications responsible for a large proportion of medication-related hospitalisations was evaluated in focus groups to identify barriers and facilitators to their implementation. These included recommendations for: reducing fall risk in elderly; initiating prophylactic medication; monitoring patients at risk of electrolyte disorders; clarifying responsibilities for patient care; informing patients about alarm symptoms; and prescribing antithrombotics on strict indication. Stakeholders were selected through purposive sampling based on their profession and healthcare sector. Transcripts of audio-recordings were analysed inductively, after which implementation factors were categorised using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty stakeholders were divided into five focus groups. These included community pharmacists (n = 9), general practitioners (n = 4), hospital pharmacists (n = 3), representatives from healthcare knowledge organisations (n = 3), patient representatives (n = 2), medical specialists (n = 2), nurses (n = 2), and other stakeholders (n = 5). Forty-nine barriers and facilitators were identified. Key themes were lack of specified responsibilities, limited information exchange, local collaboration and protocol adherence. Recommendations with a lower level of implementation often required collaboration with multiple healthcare providers, whereas recommendations with a higher level of implementation were frequently supported by clinical decision support systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A broad range of barriers and facilitators to the implementation of medication safety recommendations was identified. Overall, the findings highlight the need for recommendations with specified responsibilities, improved information exchange, strengthened local collaboration, and increased protocol adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":13828,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-026-02141-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Multiple medication safety recommendations to reduce preventable medication-related hospitalisations have been introduced in the Netherlands. Still, these hospitalisations remain prevalent. This might be due to suboptimal implementation in clinical practice. Therefore, more insight is needed into barriers and facilitators for the implementation of these medication safety recommendations across healthcare sectors.

Aim: This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators for implementing medication safety recommendations across healthcare sectors from the perspective of various stakeholders.

Method: A selection of 17 Dutch medication safety recommendations targeting medications responsible for a large proportion of medication-related hospitalisations was evaluated in focus groups to identify barriers and facilitators to their implementation. These included recommendations for: reducing fall risk in elderly; initiating prophylactic medication; monitoring patients at risk of electrolyte disorders; clarifying responsibilities for patient care; informing patients about alarm symptoms; and prescribing antithrombotics on strict indication. Stakeholders were selected through purposive sampling based on their profession and healthcare sector. Transcripts of audio-recordings were analysed inductively, after which implementation factors were categorised using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Results: Thirty stakeholders were divided into five focus groups. These included community pharmacists (n = 9), general practitioners (n = 4), hospital pharmacists (n = 3), representatives from healthcare knowledge organisations (n = 3), patient representatives (n = 2), medical specialists (n = 2), nurses (n = 2), and other stakeholders (n = 5). Forty-nine barriers and facilitators were identified. Key themes were lack of specified responsibilities, limited information exchange, local collaboration and protocol adherence. Recommendations with a lower level of implementation often required collaboration with multiple healthcare providers, whereas recommendations with a higher level of implementation were frequently supported by clinical decision support systems.

Conclusion: A broad range of barriers and facilitators to the implementation of medication safety recommendations was identified. Overall, the findings highlight the need for recommendations with specified responsibilities, improved information exchange, strengthened local collaboration, and increased protocol adherence.

实施药物安全建议的障碍和促进因素:与利益相关者的焦点小组。
导言:多项药物安全建议,以减少可预防的药物相关住院治疗已在荷兰推出。尽管如此,这些住院治疗仍然很普遍。这可能是由于在临床实践中执行不佳。因此,需要更深入地了解在医疗保健部门实施这些药物安全建议的障碍和促进因素。目的:本研究旨在从不同利益相关者的角度确定跨医疗保健部门实施药物安全建议的障碍和促进因素。方法:在焦点小组中对17项荷兰药物安全建议进行了评估,以确定实施这些建议的障碍和促进因素,这些建议针对的是导致大部分药物相关住院的药物。这些建议包括:减少老年人跌倒风险;开始预防性用药;监测有电解质紊乱风险的患者;明确照顾病人的责任;告知患者警报症状;并在严格的适应症下开抗血栓药物。利益相关者是根据他们的专业和医疗保健部门通过有目的的抽样选择的。对录音文本进行归纳分析,然后使用实施研究综合框架对实施因素进行分类。结果:30名利益相关者被分为5个焦点小组。其中包括社区药剂师(n = 9)、全科医生(n = 4)、医院药剂师(n = 3)、医疗保健知识组织代表(n = 3)、患者代表(n = 2)、医学专家(n = 2)、护士(n = 2)和其他利益相关者(n = 5)。确定了49个障碍和促进因素。关键主题是缺乏明确的责任、有限的信息交流、地方协作和遵守协议。实施水平较低的建议通常需要与多个医疗保健提供者合作,而实施水平较高的建议通常得到临床决策支持系统的支持。结论:确定了实施药物安全建议的广泛障碍和促进因素。总体而言,研究结果强调需要提出明确责任的建议、改进信息交换、加强地方协作和提高协议遵守程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
131
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy (IJCP) offers a platform for articles on research in Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Care and related practice-oriented subjects in the pharmaceutical sciences. IJCP is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research data, new ideas and discussions on pharmacotherapy and outcome research, clinical pharmacy, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacoeconomics, the clinical use of medicines, medical devices and laboratory tests, information on medicines and medical devices information, pharmacy services research, medication management, other clinical aspects of pharmacy. IJCP publishes original Research articles, Review articles , Short research reports, Commentaries, book reviews, and Letters to the Editor. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy is affiliated with the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP). ESCP promotes practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy, especially in Europe. The general aim of the society is to advance education, practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy . Until 2010 the journal was called Pharmacy World & Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书