Changes of Keratinized Mucosa Width Around Posterior Implants: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
International Journal of Dentistry Pub Date : 2026-04-24 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/ijod/5801279
Ziyao Han, Yangeng Xu, Tao Xu, Cui Wang, Yiping Wei, Wenjie Hu, Kwok-Hung Chung, Yunsong Liu
{"title":"Changes of Keratinized Mucosa Width Around Posterior Implants: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Ziyao Han, Yangeng Xu, Tao Xu, Cui Wang, Yiping Wei, Wenjie Hu, Kwok-Hung Chung, Yunsong Liu","doi":"10.1155/ijod/5801279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the changes in keratinized mucosa width (KMW) at posterior implant sites through implant treatment procedures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we measured the buccal KMW at three time points: immediately before implant placement (T0), before definitive prosthesis delivery (T1), and within 1 month after prosthesis delivery (T2). We analyzed changes in the KMW at the implant sites between these time points, using both submerged and non-submerged techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 72 patients and 98 implants were included. The KMW changed significantly from T0 to T1 (1.33 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.072, 1.561], <i>p</i> < 0.001) and from T0 to T2 (2.17 mm, 95% CI [1.929, 2.418], <i>p</i> < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in KMW changes between submerged and non-submerged implants from T0 to T1 (<i>p</i> = 0.556) or from T0 to T2 (<i>p</i> = 0.572). The height of the abutment was significantly related to the changes in KMW from T0 to T1 (-0.274 mm, 95% CI [-0.544, -0.004], <i>p</i> < 0.005), but implant technique, alveolar ridge preservation (ARP), and the diameter of the abutment were not (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The KMW at posterior implant sites decreased significantly through implant treatment procedures, which were related to the height of abutment, but not to implant technique, history of ARP, or the diameter of abutment.</p>","PeriodicalId":13947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dentistry","volume":"2026 ","pages":"5801279"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13108585/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijod/5801279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the changes in keratinized mucosa width (KMW) at posterior implant sites through implant treatment procedures.

Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, we measured the buccal KMW at three time points: immediately before implant placement (T0), before definitive prosthesis delivery (T1), and within 1 month after prosthesis delivery (T2). We analyzed changes in the KMW at the implant sites between these time points, using both submerged and non-submerged techniques.

Results: A total of 72 patients and 98 implants were included. The KMW changed significantly from T0 to T1 (1.33 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.072, 1.561], p < 0.001) and from T0 to T2 (2.17 mm, 95% CI [1.929, 2.418], p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in KMW changes between submerged and non-submerged implants from T0 to T1 (p = 0.556) or from T0 to T2 (p = 0.572). The height of the abutment was significantly related to the changes in KMW from T0 to T1 (-0.274 mm, 95% CI [-0.544, -0.004], p < 0.005), but implant technique, alveolar ridge preservation (ARP), and the diameter of the abutment were not (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: The KMW at posterior implant sites decreased significantly through implant treatment procedures, which were related to the height of abutment, but not to implant technique, history of ARP, or the diameter of abutment.

后部种植体周围角化粘膜宽度的变化:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的:探讨种植体治疗过程中种植体后部角化粘膜宽度(KMW)的变化。材料和方法:在本回顾性研究中,我们测量了三个时间点的颊部KMW:种植体放置前(T0),假体最终交付前(T1)和假体交付后1个月内(T2)。我们使用浸入式和非浸入式技术分析了这些时间点之间种植体部位KMW的变化。结果:共纳入72例患者,种植体98枚。KMW从T0到T1 (1.33 mm, 95%可信区间[CI] [1.072, 1.561], p < 0.001)和从T0到T2 (2.17 mm, 95% CI [1.929, 2.418], p < 0.001)变化显著。从T0到T1 (p = 0.556)或从T0到T2 (p = 0.572),浸入式种植体与非浸入式种植体的KMW变化无统计学差异。基牙高度与T0 ~ T1 KMW变化有显著相关性(-0.274 mm, 95% CI [-0.544, -0.004], p < 0.005),种植体技术、牙槽嵴保存(ARP)和基牙直径无显著相关性(p < 0.05)。结论:后牙种植体KMW的降低与基牙高度有关,与种植技术、ARP病史、基牙直径无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Dentistry
International Journal of Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
219
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书