Multidisciplinary team-guided combined endoscopic laparoscopic surgery for complex colonic lesions: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Mustafa Bulut, Svend Knuhtsen, Jens Ravn Eriksen, Lasse Bremholm, Ismail Gögenur
{"title":"Multidisciplinary team-guided combined endoscopic laparoscopic surgery for complex colonic lesions: a single-center retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Mustafa Bulut, Svend Knuhtsen, Jens Ravn Eriksen, Lasse Bremholm, Ismail Gögenur","doi":"10.1007/s00384-026-05131-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Combined endoscopic laparoscopic surgery (CELS) is a minimally invasive alternative treatment for complex colonic polyps that can reduce surgical overtreatment. We report implementing a standardized treatment strategy with patients selected for CELS procedures via multidisciplinary team (MDT) conferences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational cohort study included 97 consecutive patients treated with CELS between 2016 and 2022. All cases were discussed by either a benign or malignant MDT. Two CELS techniques were employed: endoscopically assisted wedge resection (EA-WR) and laparoscopically assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (LA-EMR). Patients with suspected malignancies underwent step-up segmental resection (SR) if necessary. Primary outcomes were morbidity and mortality; secondary outcomes included adherence to MDT decisions, procedure durations, length of stay (LOS), histopathology, recurrence, and follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The approach decided by the MDT was unchanged in 81% of cases (79/97). Median age was 70 years and 43% were female. Lesions had a mean size of 31 mm and were predominantly located in the right colon. Technical success for lesion removal during the index procedure was 98% (95/97), with 93% completed by CELS alone. Median operative durations were shorter for EA-WR (52 min) and LA-EMR (73 min) than for SR (163 min, p < 0.001). Median LOS was 1 day for CELS and 5 days for SR (p < 0.001). Eleven patients (11.3%) experienced complications; four required re-interventions. Adenocarcinomas were found in 15 patients (15/97, 12.6%), with treatment individualized based on intraoperative and histological findings. The recurrence rate for benign lesions was 4%; these recurrences were exclusively in the LA-EMR group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An MDT-guided strategy incorporating CELS, with optional intraoperative step-up, is an individualized and organ-preserving approach to managing complex colonic lesions that minimizes unnecessary surgical resections. This strategy has the potential to improve clinical decision-making and should be validated in multicenter settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-026-05131-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Combined endoscopic laparoscopic surgery (CELS) is a minimally invasive alternative treatment for complex colonic polyps that can reduce surgical overtreatment. We report implementing a standardized treatment strategy with patients selected for CELS procedures via multidisciplinary team (MDT) conferences.

Methods: This observational cohort study included 97 consecutive patients treated with CELS between 2016 and 2022. All cases were discussed by either a benign or malignant MDT. Two CELS techniques were employed: endoscopically assisted wedge resection (EA-WR) and laparoscopically assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (LA-EMR). Patients with suspected malignancies underwent step-up segmental resection (SR) if necessary. Primary outcomes were morbidity and mortality; secondary outcomes included adherence to MDT decisions, procedure durations, length of stay (LOS), histopathology, recurrence, and follow-up.

Results: The approach decided by the MDT was unchanged in 81% of cases (79/97). Median age was 70 years and 43% were female. Lesions had a mean size of 31 mm and were predominantly located in the right colon. Technical success for lesion removal during the index procedure was 98% (95/97), with 93% completed by CELS alone. Median operative durations were shorter for EA-WR (52 min) and LA-EMR (73 min) than for SR (163 min, p < 0.001). Median LOS was 1 day for CELS and 5 days for SR (p < 0.001). Eleven patients (11.3%) experienced complications; four required re-interventions. Adenocarcinomas were found in 15 patients (15/97, 12.6%), with treatment individualized based on intraoperative and histological findings. The recurrence rate for benign lesions was 4%; these recurrences were exclusively in the LA-EMR group.

Conclusion: An MDT-guided strategy incorporating CELS, with optional intraoperative step-up, is an individualized and organ-preserving approach to managing complex colonic lesions that minimizes unnecessary surgical resections. This strategy has the potential to improve clinical decision-making and should be validated in multicenter settings.

多学科团队指导的内镜下腹腔镜联合手术治疗复杂的结肠病变:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
目的:内镜下腹腔镜联合手术(CELS)是一种微创治疗复杂结肠息肉的替代方法,可以减少手术过度治疗。我们报告通过多学科团队(MDT)会议对选择进行CELS手术的患者实施标准化治疗策略。方法:该观察性队列研究纳入了2016年至2022年间连续97例接受CELS治疗的患者。所有病例均行良性或恶性MDT检查。采用两种CELS技术:内镜辅助楔形切除术(EA-WR)和腹腔镜辅助内镜粘膜切除术(LA-EMR)。疑似恶性肿瘤的患者,如有必要,可行分段切除(SR)。主要结局是发病率和死亡率;次要结局包括MDT决定的依从性、手术时间、住院时间(LOS)、组织病理学、复发和随访。结果:81%的病例(79/97)由MDT决定的入路不变。中位年龄为70岁,43%为女性。病变平均大小为31毫米,主要位于右结肠。在指数手术中病变移除的技术成功率为98%(95/97),其中93%仅通过CELS完成。EA-WR的中位手术时间(52分钟)和LA-EMR的中位手术时间(73分钟)短于SR的中位手术时间(163分钟)。结论:mdt指导下合并CELS的策略,可选术中强化,是一种个性化和器官保存的方法,可治疗复杂的结肠病变,最大限度地减少不必要的手术切除。该策略具有改善临床决策的潜力,应在多中心环境中进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
206
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Clinical and Molecular Gastroenterology and Surgery aims to publish novel and state-of-the-art papers which deal with the physiology and pathophysiology of diseases involving the entire gastrointestinal tract. In addition to original research articles, the following categories will be included: reviews (usually commissioned but may also be submitted), case reports, letters to the editor, and protocols on clinical studies. The journal offers its readers an interdisciplinary forum for clinical science and molecular research related to gastrointestinal disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书