Active surveillance cultures for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms in the intensive care unit: is it necessary to conduct them weekly?

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
GMS Hygiene and Infection Control Pub Date : 2026-03-20 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3205/dgkh000645
Lorena Lima, Elaine Alves, Bianca Santos, Adriana Assumpção, Priscila Oliveira, Priscilla Monteiro, Julia Mascarenhas, Clara Rizzo, Sérgio Morgado, Luiz Mascarenhas
{"title":"Active surveillance cultures for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms in the intensive care unit: is it necessary to conduct them weekly?","authors":"Lorena Lima, Elaine Alves, Bianca Santos, Adriana Assumpção, Priscila Oliveira, Priscilla Monteiro, Julia Mascarenhas, Clara Rizzo, Sérgio Morgado, Luiz Mascarenhas","doi":"10.3205/dgkh000645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) pose a major threat to public health due to the limited treatment options and their frequent association with healthcare-associated infections. Active surveillance culture (ASC), a component of infection prevention strategies, remains controversial. This study evaluated the effectiveness of ASC performed weekly versus only upon ICU admission and discharge for detecting MDR-GNB.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In a prospective study, two monitoring strategies were compared over a period of 18 months in six intensive care units. Phase 1 involved conducting ASC weekly, while Phase 2 entailed conducting ASC exclusively at the time of ICU admission and discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 233 MDR-GNB infections were documented: 130 (11.38/1,000 patient-days) in Phase 1 and 103 (8.47/1,000 patient-days) in Phase 2. This reflects a statistically significant decrease in infection rates in Phase 2 (IRR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.04-1.74). No significant differences were observed in species-specific infection rates between the two phases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reducing ASC frequency from weekly to only ICU admission and discharge did not increase MDR-GNB infection rates. The implementation of comprehensive infection prevention and control measures proved sufficient for the management of bacterial infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":12738,"journal":{"name":"GMS Hygiene and Infection Control","volume":"21 ","pages":"Doc36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13103860/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Hygiene and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) pose a major threat to public health due to the limited treatment options and their frequent association with healthcare-associated infections. Active surveillance culture (ASC), a component of infection prevention strategies, remains controversial. This study evaluated the effectiveness of ASC performed weekly versus only upon ICU admission and discharge for detecting MDR-GNB.

Materials and methods: In a prospective study, two monitoring strategies were compared over a period of 18 months in six intensive care units. Phase 1 involved conducting ASC weekly, while Phase 2 entailed conducting ASC exclusively at the time of ICU admission and discharge.

Results: A total of 233 MDR-GNB infections were documented: 130 (11.38/1,000 patient-days) in Phase 1 and 103 (8.47/1,000 patient-days) in Phase 2. This reflects a statistically significant decrease in infection rates in Phase 2 (IRR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.04-1.74). No significant differences were observed in species-specific infection rates between the two phases.

Conclusions: Reducing ASC frequency from weekly to only ICU admission and discharge did not increase MDR-GNB infection rates. The implementation of comprehensive infection prevention and control measures proved sufficient for the management of bacterial infections.

重症监护病房对多重耐药革兰氏阴性菌的主动监测培养:是否需要每周进行一次?
目的:耐多药革兰氏阴性菌(MDR-GNB)对公共卫生构成重大威胁,因为治疗选择有限,而且它们经常与卫生保健相关感染相关。作为感染预防策略的一个组成部分,主动监测培养(ASC)仍然存在争议。本研究评估了每周进行ASC与仅在ICU入院和出院时进行ASC检测耐多药gnb的有效性。材料和方法:在一项前瞻性研究中,两种监测策略在6个重症监护病房进行了为期18个月的比较。第一阶段每周进行ASC,第二阶段只在ICU入院和出院时进行ASC。结果:共记录了233例MDR-GNB感染:第一阶段为130例(11.38/ 1000患者-天),第二阶段为103例(8.47/ 1000患者-天)。这反映了2期感染率的统计学显著下降(IRR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.04-1.74)。两个阶段的物种特异性感染率无显著差异。结论:将ASC频率从每周减少到只在ICU住院和出院,并不会增加耐多药gnb感染率。综合感染防控措施的实施对细菌感染的管理是充分的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GMS Hygiene and Infection Control
GMS Hygiene and Infection Control PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书