{"title":"Covid-19 immunological consequences: immunological significance of viro-allergic-hygiene hypothesis.","authors":"Oyepata Simeon Joseph","doi":"10.1080/1744666X.2026.2664060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is assumed to begin in China with a group of severe pneumonia cases. Scientist are yet to fully understand effect and long time implication of this pandemic. This study aim at assessing infection (CF1) and mortality (CF2) indices across 154 countries to clarify these disparities and explore immuno-ecological explanations.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>One hundred and fifty four national data from WHO were normalized against the United States (CF1 = 1.0; CF2 = 1.0). Country-specific indices were calculated and grouped by WHO region. Regional means and standard deviations were generated, and comparative figures were produced to illustrate epidemiological patterns.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Europe (mean CF1 = 0.688; CF2 = 0.727) and the Americas (CF1 = 0.445; CF2 = 0.705) showed the highest combined burdens. Certain countries, including Peru, Hungary, and Bosnia, recorded disproportionately elevated mortality indices (CF2 > 1.5). Africa consistently showed near-baseline values (CF1 = 0.058; CF2 = 0.073), while the Western Pacific (CF1 = 0.175; CF2 = 0.094) and South-East Asia (CF1 = 0.274; CF2 = 0.175) demonstrated low mortality. The viro-allergy-hygiene hypothesis offers a plausible explanation, suggesting that repeated microbial exposures, endemic infections, and trained immunity recalibrate host responses and mitigate severe outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12175,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2026.2664060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is assumed to begin in China with a group of severe pneumonia cases. Scientist are yet to fully understand effect and long time implication of this pandemic. This study aim at assessing infection (CF1) and mortality (CF2) indices across 154 countries to clarify these disparities and explore immuno-ecological explanations.
Areas covered: One hundred and fifty four national data from WHO were normalized against the United States (CF1 = 1.0; CF2 = 1.0). Country-specific indices were calculated and grouped by WHO region. Regional means and standard deviations were generated, and comparative figures were produced to illustrate epidemiological patterns.
Expert opinion: Europe (mean CF1 = 0.688; CF2 = 0.727) and the Americas (CF1 = 0.445; CF2 = 0.705) showed the highest combined burdens. Certain countries, including Peru, Hungary, and Bosnia, recorded disproportionately elevated mortality indices (CF2 > 1.5). Africa consistently showed near-baseline values (CF1 = 0.058; CF2 = 0.073), while the Western Pacific (CF1 = 0.175; CF2 = 0.094) and South-East Asia (CF1 = 0.274; CF2 = 0.175) demonstrated low mortality. The viro-allergy-hygiene hypothesis offers a plausible explanation, suggesting that repeated microbial exposures, endemic infections, and trained immunity recalibrate host responses and mitigate severe outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Clinical Immunology (ISSN 1744-666X) provides expert analysis and commentary regarding the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic modalities in clinical immunology. Members of the International Editorial Advisory Panel of Expert Review of Clinical Immunology are the forefront of their area of expertise. This panel works with our dedicated editorial team to identify the most important and topical review themes and the corresponding expert(s) most appropriate to provide commentary and analysis. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the finished reviews provide an essential contribution to decision-making in clinical immunology.
Articles focus on the following key areas:
• Therapeutic overviews of specific immunologic disorders highlighting optimal therapy and prospects for new medicines
• Performance and benefits of newly approved therapeutic agents
• New diagnostic approaches
• Screening and patient stratification
• Pharmacoeconomic studies
• New therapeutic indications for existing therapies
• Adverse effects, occurrence and reduction
• Prospects for medicines in late-stage trials approaching regulatory approval
• Novel treatment strategies
• Epidemiological studies
• Commentary and comparison of treatment guidelines
Topics include infection and immunity, inflammation, host defense mechanisms, congenital and acquired immunodeficiencies, anaphylaxis and allergy, systemic immune diseases, organ-specific inflammatory diseases, transplantation immunology, endocrinology and diabetes, cancer immunology, neuroimmunology and hematological diseases.