Development and Internal Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Predicting Long-Term Opioid Therapy After Hip Fracture Surgery in Older, Opioid-Naïve Adults.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Yasmina Maria Tudorache, Simon Storgaard Jensen, Katie Jane Sheehan, Jan-Erik Gjertsen, Alma Becic Pedersen
{"title":"Development and Internal Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Predicting Long-Term Opioid Therapy After Hip Fracture Surgery in Older, Opioid-Naïve Adults.","authors":"Yasmina Maria Tudorache, Simon Storgaard Jensen, Katie Jane Sheehan, Jan-Erik Gjertsen, Alma Becic Pedersen","doi":"10.1002/ejp.70280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) after hip fracture surgery is a common postoperative complication associated with adverse outcomes, yet tools to identify at-risk patients among opioid-naïve older adults are lacking. This study aimed to develop and internally validate a parsimonious model to predict LTOT following hip fracture surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Danish nationwide registries, we identified 26,057 opioid-naïve patients (≥ 65 years) undergoing hip fracture surgery (2010-2020) and analysed 29 predictors, covering demographics, comorbidities, medication, lifestyle, socioeconomics and surgical factors. LTOT was defined as redeeming ≥ 2 prescriptions between 31 and 365 days of surgery. Models were developed using four machine learning methods: logistic regression, backwards elimination, elastic net penalised logistic regression and random forest. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration slope, intercept, Brier score and decision curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LTOT was identified in 8095 (31.1%) patients. The backward elimination algorithm identified the best performing model, selecting 8 of 29 predictors and achieving an AUC of 0.68, calibration slope of 0.99, intercept of 0.02 and Brier score of 0.20. Predictors included age, marital status, preoperative non-opioid pain medication, preoperative novel oral anticoagulants, fracture type, surgery delay, length of hospital stay and postoperative cumulated ambulation score at discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A prediction model was developed and validated for use at discharge to identify patients at risk of LTOT 1 year after hip fracture. The model may support risk stratification at discharge, but requires external validation and evaluation of clinical implementation before routine use.</p><p><strong>Significance statement: </strong>This study presents the first internally validated prediction model for long-term opioid use in opioid-naïve older adults after hip fracture surgery. The model functions as a simple and interpretable risk stratification tool at discharge and has been incorporated in a freely available risk calculator. It addresses the lack of clinically applicable risk stratification tools in this frail population and highlights opportunities for more targeted postoperative pain management, although feasibility testing is required before clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":"30 5","pages":"e70280"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13111901/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.70280","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) after hip fracture surgery is a common postoperative complication associated with adverse outcomes, yet tools to identify at-risk patients among opioid-naïve older adults are lacking. This study aimed to develop and internally validate a parsimonious model to predict LTOT following hip fracture surgery.

Methods: Using Danish nationwide registries, we identified 26,057 opioid-naïve patients (≥ 65 years) undergoing hip fracture surgery (2010-2020) and analysed 29 predictors, covering demographics, comorbidities, medication, lifestyle, socioeconomics and surgical factors. LTOT was defined as redeeming ≥ 2 prescriptions between 31 and 365 days of surgery. Models were developed using four machine learning methods: logistic regression, backwards elimination, elastic net penalised logistic regression and random forest. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration slope, intercept, Brier score and decision curve analysis.

Results: LTOT was identified in 8095 (31.1%) patients. The backward elimination algorithm identified the best performing model, selecting 8 of 29 predictors and achieving an AUC of 0.68, calibration slope of 0.99, intercept of 0.02 and Brier score of 0.20. Predictors included age, marital status, preoperative non-opioid pain medication, preoperative novel oral anticoagulants, fracture type, surgery delay, length of hospital stay and postoperative cumulated ambulation score at discharge.

Conclusions: A prediction model was developed and validated for use at discharge to identify patients at risk of LTOT 1 year after hip fracture. The model may support risk stratification at discharge, but requires external validation and evaluation of clinical implementation before routine use.

Significance statement: This study presents the first internally validated prediction model for long-term opioid use in opioid-naïve older adults after hip fracture surgery. The model functions as a simple and interpretable risk stratification tool at discharge and has been incorporated in a freely available risk calculator. It addresses the lack of clinically applicable risk stratification tools in this frail population and highlights opportunities for more targeted postoperative pain management, although feasibility testing is required before clinical implementation.

机器学习模型的开发和内部验证,用于预测老年Opioid-Naïve成人髋部骨折术后长期阿片类药物治疗。
背景:髋部骨折术后长期阿片类药物治疗(LTOT)是一种常见的与不良结果相关的术后并发症,但在opioid-naïve老年人中缺乏识别高危患者的工具。本研究旨在建立并内部验证一个预测髋部骨折术后LTOT的简约模型。方法:使用丹麦全国登记,我们确定了26,057例opioid-naïve患者(≥65岁)接受髋部骨折手术(2010-2020),并分析了29个预测因素,包括人口统计学、合并症、药物、生活方式、社会经济和手术因素。LTOT定义为在手术31 ~ 365天期间使用≥2个处方。使用四种机器学习方法开发模型:逻辑回归,向后消除,弹性网络惩罚逻辑回归和随机森林。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、校准斜率、截距、Brier评分和决策曲线分析对模型性能进行评价。结果:8095例(31.1%)患者出现LTOT。反向消去算法从29个预测因子中筛选出8个,AUC为0.68,校正斜率为0.99,截距为0.02,Brier评分为0.20。预测因素包括年龄、婚姻状况、术前非阿片类止痛药、术前新型口服抗凝剂、骨折类型、手术延迟、住院时间和术后出院时累计活动评分。结论:建立并验证了一个预测模型,用于出院时识别髋部骨折后1年有ltt风险的患者。该模型可能支持出院时的风险分层,但在常规使用前需要外部验证和临床实施评估。意义声明:本研究提出了第一个内部验证的预测模型,预测opioid-naïve老年人髋部骨折术后长期阿片类药物的使用。该模型作为一种简单且可解释的风险分层工具,已被纳入免费提供的风险计算器中。该研究解决了缺乏临床适用的风险分层工具的问题,并强调了更有针对性的术后疼痛管理的机会,尽管在临床实施之前需要进行可行性测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Pain
European Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Pain (EJP) publishes clinical and basic science research papers relevant to all aspects of pain and its management, including specialties such as anaesthesia, dentistry, neurology and neurosurgery, orthopaedics, palliative care, pharmacology, physiology, psychiatry, psychology and rehabilitation; socio-economic aspects of pain are also covered. Regular sections in the journal are as follows: • Editorials and Commentaries • Position Papers and Guidelines • Reviews • Original Articles • Letters • Bookshelf The journal particularly welcomes clinical trials, which are published on an occasional basis. Research articles are published under the following subject headings: • Neurobiology • Neurology • Experimental Pharmacology • Clinical Pharmacology • Psychology • Behavioural Therapy • Epidemiology • Cancer Pain • Acute Pain • Clinical Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书