Learning to Unveil: Tackling Implicit Bias in Pain Recognition Through Education.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Arianna Bagnis, Ilenia Ceccarelli, Franco Stella, Katia Mattarozzi
{"title":"Learning to Unveil: Tackling Implicit Bias in Pain Recognition Through Education.","authors":"Arianna Bagnis, Ilenia Ceccarelli, Franco Stella, Katia Mattarozzi","doi":"10.1002/ejp.70281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Independent studies demonstrate that racial biases and inferences from facial appearance impact healthcare decisions, especially in pain recognition and treatment, with such biases already detectable among medical students. To address this issue, the present research evaluated the effectiveness of a multifaceted evidence-based educational intervention aimed at mitigating implicit biases by increasing students' knowledge and awareness of these factors in clinical settings and fostering strategies for equitable pain management.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 100 medical students were randomly assigned to an experimental or a control group. Both groups completed a pain recognition task twice, evaluating perceived pain intensity and the likelihood of recommending treatment. Between sessions, the experimental group took part in a brief educational intervention combining theoretical input on implicit biases in pain assessment, evidence from empirical studies, and applied reflection on clinical scenarios, whereas the control group received the same lesson after completing the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings reveal that repeated exposure to the pain recognition task influenced responses in both groups, suggesting a task-related learning effect. The educational intervention significantly improved response times, pain intensity ratings, and treatment recommendations across stimuli categories, irrespective of race or facial trustworthiness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This suggests that the intervention heightened students' sensitivity to pain-related cues and encouraged a re-evaluation of clinical judgements. These results underscore the value of targeted educational initiatives in addressing disparities in pain recognition and treatment driven by facial cues, providing evidence that even brief interventions may contribute to mitigating implicit biases and support more equitable healthcare decision-making.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>This study demonstrates the effectiveness of a brief, evidence-based educational intervention in reducing implicit racial biases in pain recognition among medical students. By enhancing students' sensitivity to pain-related cues, the intervention holds promise for improving equitable healthcare practices and reducing bias-driven disparities in pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":"30 5","pages":"e70281"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13109812/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.70281","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Independent studies demonstrate that racial biases and inferences from facial appearance impact healthcare decisions, especially in pain recognition and treatment, with such biases already detectable among medical students. To address this issue, the present research evaluated the effectiveness of a multifaceted evidence-based educational intervention aimed at mitigating implicit biases by increasing students' knowledge and awareness of these factors in clinical settings and fostering strategies for equitable pain management.

Method: A total of 100 medical students were randomly assigned to an experimental or a control group. Both groups completed a pain recognition task twice, evaluating perceived pain intensity and the likelihood of recommending treatment. Between sessions, the experimental group took part in a brief educational intervention combining theoretical input on implicit biases in pain assessment, evidence from empirical studies, and applied reflection on clinical scenarios, whereas the control group received the same lesson after completing the study.

Results: The findings reveal that repeated exposure to the pain recognition task influenced responses in both groups, suggesting a task-related learning effect. The educational intervention significantly improved response times, pain intensity ratings, and treatment recommendations across stimuli categories, irrespective of race or facial trustworthiness.

Conclusions: This suggests that the intervention heightened students' sensitivity to pain-related cues and encouraged a re-evaluation of clinical judgements. These results underscore the value of targeted educational initiatives in addressing disparities in pain recognition and treatment driven by facial cues, providing evidence that even brief interventions may contribute to mitigating implicit biases and support more equitable healthcare decision-making.

Significance: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of a brief, evidence-based educational intervention in reducing implicit racial biases in pain recognition among medical students. By enhancing students' sensitivity to pain-related cues, the intervention holds promise for improving equitable healthcare practices and reducing bias-driven disparities in pain management.

学习揭开:通过教育解决疼痛识别中的内隐偏见。
背景:独立研究表明,种族偏见和面部外观的推断影响医疗保健决策,特别是在疼痛识别和治疗方面,这种偏见已经在医学生中发现。为了解决这个问题,本研究评估了多方面的循证教育干预的有效性,旨在通过增加学生在临床环境中对这些因素的知识和意识,以及促进公平疼痛管理策略,来减轻内隐偏见。方法:将100名医学生随机分为实验组和对照组。两组都完成了两次疼痛识别任务,评估感知到的疼痛强度和推荐治疗的可能性。课间,实验组参加了一个简短的教育干预,结合了对疼痛评估中的内隐偏见的理论输入、经验研究的证据和对临床情景的应用反思,而对照组在完成研究后接受了同样的课程。结果:研究结果表明,反复暴露于疼痛识别任务影响两组的反应,提示任务相关的学习效应。教育干预显著改善了反应时间、疼痛强度评分和跨刺激类别的治疗建议,而不考虑种族或面部可信度。结论:这表明干预提高了学生对疼痛相关线索的敏感性,并鼓励他们重新评估临床判断。这些结果强调了有针对性的教育举措在解决由面部线索驱动的疼痛识别和治疗差异方面的价值,提供了证据表明,即使是短暂的干预也可能有助于减轻内隐偏见,并支持更公平的医疗决策。意义:本研究证明了一个简短的、基于证据的教育干预在减少医学生疼痛认知中的内隐种族偏见方面的有效性。通过提高学生对疼痛相关线索的敏感性,干预有望改善公平的医疗保健实践,减少疼痛管理中的偏见驱动的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Pain
European Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Pain (EJP) publishes clinical and basic science research papers relevant to all aspects of pain and its management, including specialties such as anaesthesia, dentistry, neurology and neurosurgery, orthopaedics, palliative care, pharmacology, physiology, psychiatry, psychology and rehabilitation; socio-economic aspects of pain are also covered. Regular sections in the journal are as follows: • Editorials and Commentaries • Position Papers and Guidelines • Reviews • Original Articles • Letters • Bookshelf The journal particularly welcomes clinical trials, which are published on an occasional basis. Research articles are published under the following subject headings: • Neurobiology • Neurology • Experimental Pharmacology • Clinical Pharmacology • Psychology • Behavioural Therapy • Epidemiology • Cancer Pain • Acute Pain • Clinical Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书