Laís Adrielle De Oliveira Santos, Letícia Fernanda da Silva, Alexandre Rodrigo do Nascimento Gonçalves, Julia Lino Duz, Milton Alexandre Cardoso, Thiago Felicíssimo Turíbio de Camargo, Beatriz Barbosa Moreno, Paloma Kachel Gusso-Choueri, Rodrigo Brasil Choueri, Fábio Ruiz Simões, Camilo Dias Seabra Pereira, Caio Rodrigues Nobre, Renata de Britto Mari
{"title":"From fashion to the marine environments: Adverse effects of textile microfibers on Crassostrea gasar.","authors":"Laís Adrielle De Oliveira Santos, Letícia Fernanda da Silva, Alexandre Rodrigo do Nascimento Gonçalves, Julia Lino Duz, Milton Alexandre Cardoso, Thiago Felicíssimo Turíbio de Camargo, Beatriz Barbosa Moreno, Paloma Kachel Gusso-Choueri, Rodrigo Brasil Choueri, Fábio Ruiz Simões, Camilo Dias Seabra Pereira, Caio Rodrigues Nobre, Renata de Britto Mari","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgag109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The contamination of aquatic ecosystems by textile microfibers is a growing concern. Because bivalves continuously filter large volumes of water, they are particularly vulnerable to microfiber exposure, making them important indicators of emerging pollutants. The ingestion of microfibers by marine organisms can lead to bioaccumulation and biomagnification across the food chain, putting higher trophic levels at risk. This study evaluated the sublethal effects of three textile microfiber types and a mixed-fiber treatment (conventional cotton, polyester, their mixture and, organic cotton) at two exposure concentrations, a wastewater-impacted hotspot concentration (0.11 mg. L-1) and a higher level (1.00 mg. L-1), on the gills, and digestive gland, of Crassostrea gasar across 7, 14, and 21 days. Responses were assessed using biomarkers of biotransformation, antioxidant defenses, oxidative damage, genotoxicity, neurotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and survival rate. Exposure to microfibers induced multi-system toxicity with organ-specific response patterns. Reduced glutathione (GSH) levels and glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity increased in the gills but decreased in the digestive gland, whereas lipid peroxidation and DNA damage occurred in both organs. In addition, survival decreased significantly in oysters exposed to conventional cotton and mixed fibers at both concentrations (Log-rank test: cotton, P = 0.0302; mix, P = 0.0247). Among the evaluated microfiber types, organic cotton elicited the most pronounced integrated sublethal responses, as shown by notable biochemical and cellular disturbances. However, conventional cotton and mixed fibers had a more significant impact on survival, indicating that the microfiber hazard varies depending on the biological endpoint considered. These findings demonstrate that both natural and synthetic textile microfibers impair C. gasar's redox and cellular homeostasis, leading to oxidative damage and reduced survival, underscoring their ecological relevance as emerging contaminants, and the magnitude and dynamics of this toxicity depend on fiber type and exposure duration.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgag109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The contamination of aquatic ecosystems by textile microfibers is a growing concern. Because bivalves continuously filter large volumes of water, they are particularly vulnerable to microfiber exposure, making them important indicators of emerging pollutants. The ingestion of microfibers by marine organisms can lead to bioaccumulation and biomagnification across the food chain, putting higher trophic levels at risk. This study evaluated the sublethal effects of three textile microfiber types and a mixed-fiber treatment (conventional cotton, polyester, their mixture and, organic cotton) at two exposure concentrations, a wastewater-impacted hotspot concentration (0.11 mg. L-1) and a higher level (1.00 mg. L-1), on the gills, and digestive gland, of Crassostrea gasar across 7, 14, and 21 days. Responses were assessed using biomarkers of biotransformation, antioxidant defenses, oxidative damage, genotoxicity, neurotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and survival rate. Exposure to microfibers induced multi-system toxicity with organ-specific response patterns. Reduced glutathione (GSH) levels and glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity increased in the gills but decreased in the digestive gland, whereas lipid peroxidation and DNA damage occurred in both organs. In addition, survival decreased significantly in oysters exposed to conventional cotton and mixed fibers at both concentrations (Log-rank test: cotton, P = 0.0302; mix, P = 0.0247). Among the evaluated microfiber types, organic cotton elicited the most pronounced integrated sublethal responses, as shown by notable biochemical and cellular disturbances. However, conventional cotton and mixed fibers had a more significant impact on survival, indicating that the microfiber hazard varies depending on the biological endpoint considered. These findings demonstrate that both natural and synthetic textile microfibers impair C. gasar's redox and cellular homeostasis, leading to oxidative damage and reduced survival, underscoring their ecological relevance as emerging contaminants, and the magnitude and dynamics of this toxicity depend on fiber type and exposure duration.
期刊介绍:
The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...]
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.