Use of rebamipide solution as a submucosal injection material to prevent esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection: Animal study.

IF 2.3 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2026-04-14 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2820-3721
Yuichiro Hirai, Ai Fujimoto, Motoki Sasaki, Masayuki Shimoda, Naohisa Yahagi
{"title":"Use of rebamipide solution as a submucosal injection material to prevent esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection: Animal study.","authors":"Yuichiro Hirai, Ai Fujimoto, Motoki Sasaki, Masayuki Shimoda, Naohisa Yahagi","doi":"10.1055/a-2820-3721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>It is desirable to develop a safe, cost-effective, and easy approach to prevent strictures after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We explored use of a novel rebamipide solution, an anti-ulcer drug, as a submucosal injection material for preventing esophageal stricture after ESD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 15 swine, two half-circumferential ESDs were performed at the proximal and distal ends of the middle thoracic esophagus using 2% rebamipide solution or saline (control) as submucosal injection material. Five swine were sacrificed on postoperative days (PODs) 7, 14, and 21, respectively. Follow-up endoscopy was performed weekly until sacrifice. ESD-related outcomes, degree of stricture, and histological characteristics were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ESD-related outcomes were similar in both groups, with all post-ESD ulcers epithelialized by POD 14. Mean mucosal constriction rate in the rebamipide and control groups on PODs 14 and 21 were 19.1 ± 7.2% vs. 21.0 ± 6.4% ( <i>P</i> = 0.40) and 13.3 ± 6.8% vs. 20.8 ± 6.1% ( <i>P</i>  = 0.08), respectively. The rebamipide group peaked and showed milder constriction by POD 21, whereas the control group seemed to plateau. Histologically, mean fibrosis thickness in the rebamipide and control groups on days 14 and 21 were 807.0 ± 238.9 µm vs. 972.8 ± 395.1 µm ( <i>P</i>  = 0.40) and 782.8 ± 281.5 µm vs. 1087.0 ± 476.1 µm ( <i>P</i>  = 0.13), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The rebamipide solution showed no statistically significant benefit in preventing post-ESD stricture. However, given the small sample size of this study, further studies are needed to clarify its potential role.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"14 ","pages":"a28203721"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13093119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2820-3721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims: It is desirable to develop a safe, cost-effective, and easy approach to prevent strictures after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We explored use of a novel rebamipide solution, an anti-ulcer drug, as a submucosal injection material for preventing esophageal stricture after ESD.

Methods: In 15 swine, two half-circumferential ESDs were performed at the proximal and distal ends of the middle thoracic esophagus using 2% rebamipide solution or saline (control) as submucosal injection material. Five swine were sacrificed on postoperative days (PODs) 7, 14, and 21, respectively. Follow-up endoscopy was performed weekly until sacrifice. ESD-related outcomes, degree of stricture, and histological characteristics were evaluated.

Results: ESD-related outcomes were similar in both groups, with all post-ESD ulcers epithelialized by POD 14. Mean mucosal constriction rate in the rebamipide and control groups on PODs 14 and 21 were 19.1 ± 7.2% vs. 21.0 ± 6.4% ( P = 0.40) and 13.3 ± 6.8% vs. 20.8 ± 6.1% ( P  = 0.08), respectively. The rebamipide group peaked and showed milder constriction by POD 21, whereas the control group seemed to plateau. Histologically, mean fibrosis thickness in the rebamipide and control groups on days 14 and 21 were 807.0 ± 238.9 µm vs. 972.8 ± 395.1 µm ( P  = 0.40) and 782.8 ± 281.5 µm vs. 1087.0 ± 476.1 µm ( P  = 0.13), respectively.

Conclusions: The rebamipide solution showed no statistically significant benefit in preventing post-ESD stricture. However, given the small sample size of this study, further studies are needed to clarify its potential role.

使用利巴米胺溶液作为粘膜下注射材料预防内镜下粘膜下剥离后食管狭窄:动物研究。
背景与研究目的:寻找一种安全、经济、简便的方法预防食管内镜粘膜下剥离(ESD)术后狭窄的发生。我们探索了一种新型抗溃疡药物利巴米胺溶液作为预防ESD后食管狭窄的粘膜下注射材料的使用。方法:选取15头猪,采用2%利巴米胺溶液或生理盐水(对照组)作为粘膜下注射材料,分别在胸椎中段食管近端和远端进行2次半周ESDs。分别于术后第7、14和21天处死5头猪。每周随访内窥镜检查,直至牺牲。评估esd相关结果、狭窄程度和组织学特征。结果:两组的esd相关结果相似,所有esd后溃疡均由POD 14上皮化。利巴米胺组和对照组在pod 14和pod 21的平均粘膜收缩率分别为19.1±7.2%比21.0±6.4% (P = 0.40)和13.3±6.8%比20.8±6.1% (P = 0.08)。利巴米胺组POD - 21达到峰值,表现出较温和的收缩,而对照组则趋于平稳。组织学上,瑞巴米胺组和对照组在第14、21天的平均纤维化厚度分别为807.0±238.9µm∶972.8±395.1µm (P = 0.40)和782.8±281.5µm∶1087.0±476.1µm (P = 0.13)。结论:利巴米胺溶液在预防esd后狭窄方面没有统计学意义。然而,由于本研究的样本量较小,需要进一步的研究来阐明其潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书