From Empirical Discovery to Targeted Therapy: The Evolution of Tuberculosis Treatment.

IF 10.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Natalie J E Waller, Kyu Y Rhee
{"title":"From Empirical Discovery to Targeted Therapy: The Evolution of Tuberculosis Treatment.","authors":"Natalie J E Waller, Kyu Y Rhee","doi":"10.1101/cshperspect.a041821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tuberculosis (TB) chemotherapy was once considered a crowning triumph of modern medicine but has since reemerged as a persisting paradox. While therapeutically still effective in most cases, current frontline treatments for TB remain largely unchanged from their introduction over 50 years ago and continue to require a minimum of 6 months of multidrug treatment to achieve durable cure, limiting both their individual and population level impact. Its impact has been further eroded by the emergence and spread of drug resistance. Although new antibiotics active against drug-resistant TB are beginning to emerge, their integration into shorter, more effective regimens has proven difficult. This review revisits the evolution of TB chemotherapy and explores how individual drug properties shape overall regimen efficacy and treatment duration. While initially shaped by efforts to prevent resistance-based treatment failures while minimizing toxicity, the empirical development of combination chemotherapies revealed additional determinants of treatment efficacy that extended beyond conventional antimicrobial potency and impacted treatment duration. By integrating classical findings with modern insights into pharmacology, lesion physiology, and bacterial persistence, we highlight the potential that mechanism-based insights into existing TB chemotherapies could guide the rational design of next-generation, treatment-shortening combinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10452,"journal":{"name":"Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a041821","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) chemotherapy was once considered a crowning triumph of modern medicine but has since reemerged as a persisting paradox. While therapeutically still effective in most cases, current frontline treatments for TB remain largely unchanged from their introduction over 50 years ago and continue to require a minimum of 6 months of multidrug treatment to achieve durable cure, limiting both their individual and population level impact. Its impact has been further eroded by the emergence and spread of drug resistance. Although new antibiotics active against drug-resistant TB are beginning to emerge, their integration into shorter, more effective regimens has proven difficult. This review revisits the evolution of TB chemotherapy and explores how individual drug properties shape overall regimen efficacy and treatment duration. While initially shaped by efforts to prevent resistance-based treatment failures while minimizing toxicity, the empirical development of combination chemotherapies revealed additional determinants of treatment efficacy that extended beyond conventional antimicrobial potency and impacted treatment duration. By integrating classical findings with modern insights into pharmacology, lesion physiology, and bacterial persistence, we highlight the potential that mechanism-based insights into existing TB chemotherapies could guide the rational design of next-generation, treatment-shortening combinations.

从经验发现到靶向治疗:结核病治疗的演变。
结核病(TB)化疗曾被认为是现代医学的最高胜利,但后来又重新出现,成为一个持续存在的悖论。虽然在大多数情况下仍然有效,但目前的结核病一线治疗方法与50多年前采用的方法相比基本没有变化,并且仍然需要至少6个月的多药治疗才能实现持久治愈,这限制了其对个人和人群水平的影响。耐药性的出现和蔓延进一步削弱了其影响。尽管对耐药结核病有活性的新抗生素开始出现,但事实证明,很难将它们整合到更短、更有效的治疗方案中。这篇综述回顾了结核病化疗的发展,并探讨了个体药物特性如何影响整体方案的疗效和治疗时间。虽然最初是为了防止基于耐药性的治疗失败,同时尽量减少毒性,但联合化疗的经验发展揭示了治疗效果的其他决定因素,这些决定因素超出了传统的抗菌药物效力并影响了治疗时间。通过将经典发现与药理学、病变生理学和细菌持久性的现代见解相结合,我们强调了对现有结核病化疗的基于机制的见解可以指导合理设计下一代缩短治疗时间的组合的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine
Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
1.90%
发文量
44
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine is a monthly online publication comprising reviews on different aspects of a variety of diseases, covering everything from the molecular and cellular bases of disease to translational medicine and new therapeutic strategies. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine is thus unmatched in its depth of coverage and represents an essential source where readers can find informed surveys and critical discussion of advances in molecular medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书