Position Statement: Integrating Planetary Health into Infection Prevention and Control in Healthcare Settings - Toward a Balanced and Evidence-Based Approach.

IF 8.5 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Ermira Tartari, Emine Alp Meşe, Andre N H Bulabula, Stephanie J Dancer, Daniele Roberto Giacobbe, Manuel Krone, Claire Kilpatrick, Aleksandra Marek, Nicola Petrosillo, Elisabeth Presterl, Manish Ranjan, Juliëtte A Severin, Giacomo Stroffolini, Alma Tostmann, Margreet C Vos, Andreas F Widmer, Walter Zingg
{"title":"Position Statement: Integrating Planetary Health into Infection Prevention and Control in Healthcare Settings - Toward a Balanced and Evidence-Based Approach.","authors":"Ermira Tartari, Emine Alp Meşe, Andre N H Bulabula, Stephanie J Dancer, Daniele Roberto Giacobbe, Manuel Krone, Claire Kilpatrick, Aleksandra Marek, Nicola Petrosillo, Elisabeth Presterl, Manish Ranjan, Juliëtte A Severin, Giacomo Stroffolini, Alma Tostmann, Margreet C Vos, Andreas F Widmer, Walter Zingg","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2026.04.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infection prevention and control (IPC) is fundamental for patient safety. Effective IPC generates direct ecological benefits by preventing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), thereby reducing prolonged hospitalisation, antibiotic use, and resource consumption. Paradoxically, IPC measures: single-use materials, chemical disinfectants, and resource-intensive waste streams, contribute to healthcare's greenhouse-gas emissions and environmental burden. As climate change and environmental degradation threaten human and ecosystem health, there is growing urgency to evaluate IPC measures through a planetary health lens, ensuring sustainability considerations complement rather than compromise infection prevention outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This position paper by the ESCMID Study Group for Nosocomial Infections (ESGNI) examines intersections between IPC practice and planetary health. Drawing on a synthesis of current evidence and expert consensus, it identifies opportunities to reduce the environmental footprint of IPC where evidence supports equivalent or superior IPC outcomes, and outlines research and policy priorities where evidence remains insufficient.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>The paper analyses five key domains at the IPC-planetary health interface: 1) single-use versus reusable, 2) biocides and environmental contamination, 3) healthcare waste, 4) AMR: IPC priorities within a One Health framework, and 5) IPC and planetary health in low- and middle-income countries. Cross-cutting themes, including circular economy principles, life-cycle assessment, regulatory barriers, and climate-related risks are explored, with implications for regulation, procurement, infrastructure, and workforce competencies.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Sustainability considerations in IPC must function as a complement to, not a substitute for, infection prevention outcomes. Where evidence supports equivalent safety with a reduced environmental footprint, change is justified and should be pursued through evidence-based, risk-stratified, and context-specific approaches. Achieving this requires regulatory reform, interdisciplinary collaboration, and targeted investment in research, education, and capacity building. Positioning IPC as a partner in sustainable healthcare offers a pathway to reduce avoidable environmental harm while strengthening resilience against infectious threats - with patient safety as the primary and non-negotiable objective.</p>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2026.04.017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infection prevention and control (IPC) is fundamental for patient safety. Effective IPC generates direct ecological benefits by preventing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), thereby reducing prolonged hospitalisation, antibiotic use, and resource consumption. Paradoxically, IPC measures: single-use materials, chemical disinfectants, and resource-intensive waste streams, contribute to healthcare's greenhouse-gas emissions and environmental burden. As climate change and environmental degradation threaten human and ecosystem health, there is growing urgency to evaluate IPC measures through a planetary health lens, ensuring sustainability considerations complement rather than compromise infection prevention outcomes.

Aims: This position paper by the ESCMID Study Group for Nosocomial Infections (ESGNI) examines intersections between IPC practice and planetary health. Drawing on a synthesis of current evidence and expert consensus, it identifies opportunities to reduce the environmental footprint of IPC where evidence supports equivalent or superior IPC outcomes, and outlines research and policy priorities where evidence remains insufficient.

Content: The paper analyses five key domains at the IPC-planetary health interface: 1) single-use versus reusable, 2) biocides and environmental contamination, 3) healthcare waste, 4) AMR: IPC priorities within a One Health framework, and 5) IPC and planetary health in low- and middle-income countries. Cross-cutting themes, including circular economy principles, life-cycle assessment, regulatory barriers, and climate-related risks are explored, with implications for regulation, procurement, infrastructure, and workforce competencies.

Implications: Sustainability considerations in IPC must function as a complement to, not a substitute for, infection prevention outcomes. Where evidence supports equivalent safety with a reduced environmental footprint, change is justified and should be pursued through evidence-based, risk-stratified, and context-specific approaches. Achieving this requires regulatory reform, interdisciplinary collaboration, and targeted investment in research, education, and capacity building. Positioning IPC as a partner in sustainable healthcare offers a pathway to reduce avoidable environmental harm while strengthening resilience against infectious threats - with patient safety as the primary and non-negotiable objective.

立场声明:将地球健康纳入医疗保健机构的感染预防和控制——朝着平衡和循证方法迈进。
背景:感染预防和控制(IPC)是患者安全的基础。有效的IPC通过预防医疗保健相关感染(HAIs)产生直接的生态效益,从而减少长期住院、抗生素使用和资源消耗。矛盾的是,IPC措施:一次性材料、化学消毒剂和资源密集型废物流,助长了医疗保健的温室气体排放和环境负担。由于气候变化和环境退化威胁着人类和生态系统的健康,因此越来越迫切需要从地球健康的角度评估IPC措施,确保可持续性考虑补充而不是损害感染预防结果。目的:本立场文件由ESCMID医院感染研究小组(ESGNI)撰写,研究IPC实践与地球健康之间的交叉点。在综合现有证据和专家共识的基础上,它确定了在证据支持同等或更好的IPC结果的情况下减少IPC环境足迹的机会,并概述了证据仍然不足的研究和政策重点。内容:本文分析了ipcc -地球健康界面的五个关键领域:1)一次性使用与可重复使用;2)杀菌剂和环境污染;3)医疗保健废物;4)抗生素耐药性:“一个健康”框架内的IPC优先事项;5)低收入和中等收入国家的IPC和地球健康。探讨了包括循环经济原则、生命周期评估、监管障碍和气候相关风险在内的跨领域主题,以及对监管、采购、基础设施和劳动力能力的影响。意义:IPC中的可持续性考虑必须作为感染预防结果的补充,而不是替代。如果有证据支持减少环境足迹的同等安全性,那么改变是合理的,应该通过循证、风险分层和具体情况的方法来追求。实现这一目标需要监管改革、跨学科合作以及在研究、教育和能力建设方面的有针对性的投资。将IPC定位为可持续医疗保健的合作伙伴,提供了一条途径,可以减少可避免的环境危害,同时加强对传染性威胁的抵御能力——将患者安全作为首要和不可妥协的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
441
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书