Position Statement: Integrating Planetary Health into Infection Prevention and Control in Healthcare Settings - Toward a Balanced and Evidence-Based Approach.
Ermira Tartari, Emine Alp Meşe, Andre N H Bulabula, Stephanie J Dancer, Daniele Roberto Giacobbe, Manuel Krone, Claire Kilpatrick, Aleksandra Marek, Nicola Petrosillo, Elisabeth Presterl, Manish Ranjan, Juliëtte A Severin, Giacomo Stroffolini, Alma Tostmann, Margreet C Vos, Andreas F Widmer, Walter Zingg
{"title":"Position Statement: Integrating Planetary Health into Infection Prevention and Control in Healthcare Settings - Toward a Balanced and Evidence-Based Approach.","authors":"Ermira Tartari, Emine Alp Meşe, Andre N H Bulabula, Stephanie J Dancer, Daniele Roberto Giacobbe, Manuel Krone, Claire Kilpatrick, Aleksandra Marek, Nicola Petrosillo, Elisabeth Presterl, Manish Ranjan, Juliëtte A Severin, Giacomo Stroffolini, Alma Tostmann, Margreet C Vos, Andreas F Widmer, Walter Zingg","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2026.04.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infection prevention and control (IPC) is fundamental for patient safety. Effective IPC generates direct ecological benefits by preventing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), thereby reducing prolonged hospitalisation, antibiotic use, and resource consumption. Paradoxically, IPC measures: single-use materials, chemical disinfectants, and resource-intensive waste streams, contribute to healthcare's greenhouse-gas emissions and environmental burden. As climate change and environmental degradation threaten human and ecosystem health, there is growing urgency to evaluate IPC measures through a planetary health lens, ensuring sustainability considerations complement rather than compromise infection prevention outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This position paper by the ESCMID Study Group for Nosocomial Infections (ESGNI) examines intersections between IPC practice and planetary health. Drawing on a synthesis of current evidence and expert consensus, it identifies opportunities to reduce the environmental footprint of IPC where evidence supports equivalent or superior IPC outcomes, and outlines research and policy priorities where evidence remains insufficient.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>The paper analyses five key domains at the IPC-planetary health interface: 1) single-use versus reusable, 2) biocides and environmental contamination, 3) healthcare waste, 4) AMR: IPC priorities within a One Health framework, and 5) IPC and planetary health in low- and middle-income countries. Cross-cutting themes, including circular economy principles, life-cycle assessment, regulatory barriers, and climate-related risks are explored, with implications for regulation, procurement, infrastructure, and workforce competencies.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Sustainability considerations in IPC must function as a complement to, not a substitute for, infection prevention outcomes. Where evidence supports equivalent safety with a reduced environmental footprint, change is justified and should be pursued through evidence-based, risk-stratified, and context-specific approaches. Achieving this requires regulatory reform, interdisciplinary collaboration, and targeted investment in research, education, and capacity building. Positioning IPC as a partner in sustainable healthcare offers a pathway to reduce avoidable environmental harm while strengthening resilience against infectious threats - with patient safety as the primary and non-negotiable objective.</p>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2026.04.017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Infection prevention and control (IPC) is fundamental for patient safety. Effective IPC generates direct ecological benefits by preventing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), thereby reducing prolonged hospitalisation, antibiotic use, and resource consumption. Paradoxically, IPC measures: single-use materials, chemical disinfectants, and resource-intensive waste streams, contribute to healthcare's greenhouse-gas emissions and environmental burden. As climate change and environmental degradation threaten human and ecosystem health, there is growing urgency to evaluate IPC measures through a planetary health lens, ensuring sustainability considerations complement rather than compromise infection prevention outcomes.
Aims: This position paper by the ESCMID Study Group for Nosocomial Infections (ESGNI) examines intersections between IPC practice and planetary health. Drawing on a synthesis of current evidence and expert consensus, it identifies opportunities to reduce the environmental footprint of IPC where evidence supports equivalent or superior IPC outcomes, and outlines research and policy priorities where evidence remains insufficient.
Content: The paper analyses five key domains at the IPC-planetary health interface: 1) single-use versus reusable, 2) biocides and environmental contamination, 3) healthcare waste, 4) AMR: IPC priorities within a One Health framework, and 5) IPC and planetary health in low- and middle-income countries. Cross-cutting themes, including circular economy principles, life-cycle assessment, regulatory barriers, and climate-related risks are explored, with implications for regulation, procurement, infrastructure, and workforce competencies.
Implications: Sustainability considerations in IPC must function as a complement to, not a substitute for, infection prevention outcomes. Where evidence supports equivalent safety with a reduced environmental footprint, change is justified and should be pursued through evidence-based, risk-stratified, and context-specific approaches. Achieving this requires regulatory reform, interdisciplinary collaboration, and targeted investment in research, education, and capacity building. Positioning IPC as a partner in sustainable healthcare offers a pathway to reduce avoidable environmental harm while strengthening resilience against infectious threats - with patient safety as the primary and non-negotiable objective.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.