Efficacy and Safety of Olanzapine Long-acting Injection in Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience Pub Date : 2026-05-31 Epub Date: 2026-04-02 DOI:10.9758/cpn.25.1372
Jithin Thekkelkuthiyathottil Joseph, Rashmi Vishwanath, Sonia Shenoy
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Olanzapine Long-acting Injection in Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Jithin Thekkelkuthiyathottil Joseph, Rashmi Vishwanath, Sonia Shenoy","doi":"10.9758/cpn.25.1372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Olanzapine long-acting injection (LAI) is a second-generation antipsychotic used in patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, particularly those with poor adherence. However, evidence on its comparative efficacy, safety, and tolerability remains limited. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Six databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, ProQuest) were searched through May 2025. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental, and observational studies evaluating olanzapine LAI in adults with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Risk of bias was assessed using Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool for Randomized Trials (Version 2), Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were synthesized using RevMan 5.4. Nine studies (n = 2,915) met inclusion criteria; only two RCTs were eligible for meta-analysis. Olanzapine LAI showed no significant difference from oral olanzapine in reducing Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale scores (mean difference = 1.41; 95% CI: -0.22 to 3.04; <i>p</i> = 0.09) or Clinical Global Impression-Severity scores (mean difference = 0.03; 95% CI: -0.15 to 0.21; <i>p</i> = 0.73). Relapse (OR = 1.15; 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.61), adverse events (OR = 1.12; 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.42), and weight gain were also similar. Across included studies, post-injection delirium/sedation syndrome was reported in 47 participants and resolved without hospitalization or long-term sequelae. Based on low-certainty evidence from limited RCTs, olanzapine LAI appears comparable in efficacy and tolerability to oral olanzapine. It may be considered for patients with adherence difficulties, but careful safety monitoring is required and further head-to-head trials are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10420,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience","volume":"24 2","pages":"226-239"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13122169/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9758/cpn.25.1372","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Olanzapine long-acting injection (LAI) is a second-generation antipsychotic used in patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, particularly those with poor adherence. However, evidence on its comparative efficacy, safety, and tolerability remains limited. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Six databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, ProQuest) were searched through May 2025. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental, and observational studies evaluating olanzapine LAI in adults with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Risk of bias was assessed using Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool for Randomized Trials (Version 2), Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were synthesized using RevMan 5.4. Nine studies (n = 2,915) met inclusion criteria; only two RCTs were eligible for meta-analysis. Olanzapine LAI showed no significant difference from oral olanzapine in reducing Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale scores (mean difference = 1.41; 95% CI: -0.22 to 3.04; p = 0.09) or Clinical Global Impression-Severity scores (mean difference = 0.03; 95% CI: -0.15 to 0.21; p = 0.73). Relapse (OR = 1.15; 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.61), adverse events (OR = 1.12; 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.42), and weight gain were also similar. Across included studies, post-injection delirium/sedation syndrome was reported in 47 participants and resolved without hospitalization or long-term sequelae. Based on low-certainty evidence from limited RCTs, olanzapine LAI appears comparable in efficacy and tolerability to oral olanzapine. It may be considered for patients with adherence difficulties, but careful safety monitoring is required and further head-to-head trials are needed.

长效注射奥氮平治疗精神分裂症和分裂情感性障碍的疗效和安全性:系统综述和meta分析。
奥氮平长效注射液(LAI)是第二代抗精神病药物,用于精神分裂症谱系障碍患者,特别是依从性差的患者。然而,关于其相对有效性、安全性和耐受性的证据仍然有限。我们按照PRISMA 2020指南进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。6个数据库(PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, ProQuest)被检索到2025年5月。我们纳入了随机对照试验(rct)、准实验和观察性研究,以评估奥氮平对精神分裂症或分裂情感障碍成人的LAI。偏倚风险评估采用Cochrane随机试验风险-偏倚工具修订版(第2版)、非随机干预研究的偏倚风险和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表。数据采用RevMan 5.4进行综合。9项研究(n = 2915)符合纳入标准;只有两个rct符合meta分析。奥氮平LAI与口服奥氮平在降低阳性和阴性症状量表评分(平均差异= 1.41;95% CI: -0.22至3.04;p = 0.09)或临床总体印象-严重程度评分(平均差异= 0.03;95% CI: -0.15至0.21;p = 0.73)方面无显著差异。复发(OR = 1.15; 95% CI: 0.82 ~ 1.61)、不良事件(OR = 1.12; 95% CI: 0.88 ~ 1.42)和体重增加也相似。在纳入的研究中,47名参与者报告了注射后谵妄/镇静综合征,没有住院治疗或长期后遗症。基于有限随机对照试验的低确定性证据,奥氮平LAI的疗效和耐受性与口服奥氮平相当。对于有依从性困难的患者可以考虑使用,但需要仔细的安全性监测,并需要进一步的头对头试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCESPHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience (Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci) launched in 2003, is the official journal of The Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology (KCNP), and the associate journal for Asian College of Neuropsychopharmacology (AsCNP). This journal aims to publish evidence-based, scientifically written articles related to clinical and preclinical studies in the field of psychopharmacology and neuroscience. This journal intends to foster and encourage communications between psychiatrist, neuroscientist and all related experts in Asia as well as worldwide. It is published four times a year at the last day of February, May, August, and November.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书