Post-traumatic stress symptom trajectories following exposure to population-level trauma: findings from the COVID-19 Healthcare Staff Wellbeing Survey.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Kevin F W Dyer, Niamh Hurst, Ciaran Shannon, Julie-Ann Jordan
{"title":"Post-traumatic stress symptom trajectories following exposure to population-level trauma: findings from the COVID-19 Healthcare Staff Wellbeing Survey.","authors":"Kevin F W Dyer, Niamh Hurst, Ciaran Shannon, Julie-Ann Jordan","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2026.11027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has been described as a prolonged societal trauma providing new understanding of long-term post-traumatic stress reactions, both generally and in specific at-risk populations.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The present study examined the longitudinal course of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms within one of the most high-profile risk groups (i.e. healthcare staff).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The sample comprised 439 healthcare staff who completed the Northern Ireland longitudinal COVID-19 Staff Wellbeing Survey on a minimum of 3 out of 4 distribution time points. The survey was administered repeatedly over 4 years, spanning both peri- and post-pandemic periods (2020-2023), and contained the Impact of Event Scale-Revised, as well as bespoke items on COVID-19, demographics, occupational issues and support factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three distinct classes emerged from a three-class, latent class growth analysis model. A 'resilient' group (74%) displayed symptoms that remained below cut-offs for clinically significant moderate-severe post-traumatic stress throughout the pandemic, whereas a 'recovering' group (23%) exhibited moderate-severe symptoms during the pandemic, which then decreased to subthreshold levels post-pandemic. A key at-risk group was the 'chronic' class (4%), which had moderate-severe post-traumatic stress symptoms peri-pandemic that continued to increase post-pandemic. Significant predictors of the 'recovering' and 'chronic' classes included perception of poor communication within the healthcare organisation; increased exposure to COVID-19 outside their work; and increased personal health risk factors for COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Post-pandemic PTSD monitoring and support for healthcare staff may be warranted alongside the development of internal communication strategies within healthcare systems to protect staff and services going forward.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"12 3","pages":"e120"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13122331/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2026.11027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has been described as a prolonged societal trauma providing new understanding of long-term post-traumatic stress reactions, both generally and in specific at-risk populations.

Aims: The present study examined the longitudinal course of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms within one of the most high-profile risk groups (i.e. healthcare staff).

Method: The sample comprised 439 healthcare staff who completed the Northern Ireland longitudinal COVID-19 Staff Wellbeing Survey on a minimum of 3 out of 4 distribution time points. The survey was administered repeatedly over 4 years, spanning both peri- and post-pandemic periods (2020-2023), and contained the Impact of Event Scale-Revised, as well as bespoke items on COVID-19, demographics, occupational issues and support factors.

Results: Three distinct classes emerged from a three-class, latent class growth analysis model. A 'resilient' group (74%) displayed symptoms that remained below cut-offs for clinically significant moderate-severe post-traumatic stress throughout the pandemic, whereas a 'recovering' group (23%) exhibited moderate-severe symptoms during the pandemic, which then decreased to subthreshold levels post-pandemic. A key at-risk group was the 'chronic' class (4%), which had moderate-severe post-traumatic stress symptoms peri-pandemic that continued to increase post-pandemic. Significant predictors of the 'recovering' and 'chronic' classes included perception of poor communication within the healthcare organisation; increased exposure to COVID-19 outside their work; and increased personal health risk factors for COVID-19.

Conclusions: Post-pandemic PTSD monitoring and support for healthcare staff may be warranted alongside the development of internal communication strategies within healthcare systems to protect staff and services going forward.

暴露于人群水平创伤后的创伤后应激症状轨迹:来自COVID-19医护人员福祉调查的结果。
背景:COVID-19大流行被描述为一种长期的社会创伤,为一般人群和特定高危人群的长期创伤后应激反应提供了新的认识。目的:本研究考察了创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状的纵向过程中最引人注目的风险群体之一(即医护人员)。方法:样本包括439名医务人员,他们在4个分布时间点中的至少3个完成了北爱尔兰COVID-19员工纵向健康调查。该调查在4年多的时间里反复进行,涵盖了大流行期间和大流行后时期(2020-2023年),包含了事件规模修订的影响,以及对COVID-19、人口统计、职业问题和支持因素的定制项目。结果:从一个三分类、潜在分类增长分析模型中出现了三个不同的分类。“复原”组(74%)在整个大流行期间表现出的症状仍低于临床显著的中度至重度创伤后应激的临界值,而“复原”组(23%)在大流行期间表现出中度至重度症状,然后在大流行后降至阈值以下水平。一个关键的风险群体是“慢性”类(4%),他们在大流行期间有中重度创伤后应激症状,在大流行后继续增加。“康复”和“慢性”类的重要预测因素包括对医疗机构内沟通不良的看法;在工作之外接触COVID-19的机会增加;增加了COVID-19的个人健康风险因素。结论:大流行后PTSD监测和对医护人员的支持可能是有必要的,同时在医疗系统内制定内部沟通策略,以保护员工和未来的服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书