Suzanne Heywood-Everett, Louisa J Shirley, Noor Aqsa, Kate Fitzgerald, Ryan Horsfall
{"title":"NICE guidance, eating disorders and older people.","authors":"Suzanne Heywood-Everett, Louisa J Shirley, Noor Aqsa, Kate Fitzgerald, Ryan Horsfall","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2026.11006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment of eating disorders by the National Health Service in England and Wales adheres to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines, which were informed by an experimental evidence base.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>As the presentation and treatment of eating disorders have been shown to vary on the basis of age, we aimed to review the representation of older people in the evidence base for the NICE guidelines.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The evidence base was reviewed by identification of participant ages and the recruitment methods used in the experimental literature. The use of clinician referral was of particular interest, owing to the age-dependent risk of eating disorders being misdiagnosed in older adults.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results highlighted low participant ages across the evidence base, most notably in anorexia nervosa samples. In accordance with the age data, a high frequency of clinician referral was used to recruit participants, with the highest rate identified in anorexia nervosa samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NICE guidance fails to consider the economic, social, political and health contexts around onset or chronological development of an eating disorder, with no reference to comorbidities which are commonly reported with older people or how this might affect diagnosis, formulation and treatment recommendations. Research is urgently required to inform clinical recommendations for older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"12 3","pages":"e123"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13126286/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2026.11006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The treatment of eating disorders by the National Health Service in England and Wales adheres to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines, which were informed by an experimental evidence base.
Aims: As the presentation and treatment of eating disorders have been shown to vary on the basis of age, we aimed to review the representation of older people in the evidence base for the NICE guidelines.
Method: The evidence base was reviewed by identification of participant ages and the recruitment methods used in the experimental literature. The use of clinician referral was of particular interest, owing to the age-dependent risk of eating disorders being misdiagnosed in older adults.
Results: The results highlighted low participant ages across the evidence base, most notably in anorexia nervosa samples. In accordance with the age data, a high frequency of clinician referral was used to recruit participants, with the highest rate identified in anorexia nervosa samples.
Conclusions: NICE guidance fails to consider the economic, social, political and health contexts around onset or chronological development of an eating disorder, with no reference to comorbidities which are commonly reported with older people or how this might affect diagnosis, formulation and treatment recommendations. Research is urgently required to inform clinical recommendations for older adults.
期刊介绍:
Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.