Effects of Olfactory Training on Olfactory Bulb Volume Among Patients With Non-Sinonasal-Related Olfactory Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-23 DOI:10.1177/19458924261442892
Xiangxian Liu, Xincen Jiang, Yankun Li, Xinyi Ge, Dawei Wu
{"title":"Effects of Olfactory Training on Olfactory Bulb Volume Among Patients With Non-Sinonasal-Related Olfactory Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Xiangxian Liu, Xincen Jiang, Yankun Li, Xinyi Ge, Dawei Wu","doi":"10.1177/19458924261442892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveOlfactory training (OT) is being used increasingly among patients with olfactory dysfunction (OD). Evidence suggests that OT could significantly improve olfactory function among patients with non-sinonasal-related OD. Neuroplasticity of olfactory bulb (OB) is associated with the input of olfactory receptor neurons, and exposure to a wide variety of odors facilitates neuroplasticity of OB. This study aimed to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of OT on olfactory bulb volume (OBV) among patients with non-sinonasal-related OD.MethodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies sourced from PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Embase, covering the period from their inception to May 2025. The included studies provided magnetic resonance imaging measurements of OBV in individuals with non-sinonasal-related OD or normosmia individuals. These participants either underwent OT or were part of a non-intervention control group.ResultsSeven studies with 310 participants were analyzed to assess changes in OBV before and after OT. The training significantly improved overall unilateral OBV by 2.14 mm<sup>3</sup> [<i>Z</i> = 5.27; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.34-2.93; <i>P</i> < .001], with the OBV of patients with non-sinonasal OD increasing by 1.91 mm<sup>3</sup> (<i>Z</i> = 4.47; 95%CI, 1.07-2.75; <i>P</i> < .001) and OBV of healthy individuals by 4.22 mm<sup>3</sup> (<i>Z</i> = 3.26; 95%CI, 1.68-6.75; <i>P</i> = .001). Among patients with non-sinonasal-related OD, OT resulted in an increase of 1.52 mm<sup>3</sup> in the left OBV (<i>Z</i> = 2.66; 95%CI, 0.40-2.64; <i>P</i> = .008) and an increase of 2.40 mm<sup>3</sup> in the right OBV (<i>Z</i> = 3.74; 95%CI, 1.14-3.66; <i>P</i> < .001). There were no significant differences in OBV changes between the left and right sides (<i>P</i> = .30). In contrast, patients with non-sinonasal-related OD who did not receive OT did not show significant changes in OBV after OT (<i>Z</i> = 0.74, <i>P</i> = .46).ConclusionsThis meta-analysis provided evidence that OT was associated with a small but statistically significant increase in OBV among patients with non-sinonasal-related OD. The increase in OBV was comparable between the left and right OB of patients with non-sinonasal-related OD.</p>","PeriodicalId":7650,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","volume":" ","pages":"453-463"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924261442892","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveOlfactory training (OT) is being used increasingly among patients with olfactory dysfunction (OD). Evidence suggests that OT could significantly improve olfactory function among patients with non-sinonasal-related OD. Neuroplasticity of olfactory bulb (OB) is associated with the input of olfactory receptor neurons, and exposure to a wide variety of odors facilitates neuroplasticity of OB. This study aimed to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of OT on olfactory bulb volume (OBV) among patients with non-sinonasal-related OD.MethodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies sourced from PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Embase, covering the period from their inception to May 2025. The included studies provided magnetic resonance imaging measurements of OBV in individuals with non-sinonasal-related OD or normosmia individuals. These participants either underwent OT or were part of a non-intervention control group.ResultsSeven studies with 310 participants were analyzed to assess changes in OBV before and after OT. The training significantly improved overall unilateral OBV by 2.14 mm3 [Z = 5.27; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.34-2.93; P < .001], with the OBV of patients with non-sinonasal OD increasing by 1.91 mm3 (Z = 4.47; 95%CI, 1.07-2.75; P < .001) and OBV of healthy individuals by 4.22 mm3 (Z = 3.26; 95%CI, 1.68-6.75; P = .001). Among patients with non-sinonasal-related OD, OT resulted in an increase of 1.52 mm3 in the left OBV (Z = 2.66; 95%CI, 0.40-2.64; P = .008) and an increase of 2.40 mm3 in the right OBV (Z = 3.74; 95%CI, 1.14-3.66; P < .001). There were no significant differences in OBV changes between the left and right sides (P = .30). In contrast, patients with non-sinonasal-related OD who did not receive OT did not show significant changes in OBV after OT (Z = 0.74, P = .46).ConclusionsThis meta-analysis provided evidence that OT was associated with a small but statistically significant increase in OBV among patients with non-sinonasal-related OD. The increase in OBV was comparable between the left and right OB of patients with non-sinonasal-related OD.

嗅觉训练对非鼻相关嗅觉功能障碍患者嗅球体积的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的嗅觉训练(OT)在嗅觉功能障碍(OD)患者中的应用越来越广泛。有证据表明,OT可以显著改善非鼻窦相关性OD患者的嗅觉功能。嗅球(OB)的神经可塑性与嗅觉受体神经元的输入有关,暴露于多种气味有助于OB的神经可塑性。本研究旨在通过meta分析评估OT对非鼻窦相关性OD患者嗅球体积(OBV)的影响。方法我们对来自PubMed、b谷歌Scholar、Web of Science和Embase的研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,涵盖了从它们成立到2025年5月的时间。纳入的研究提供了非鼻窦炎相关OD或正常血症个体OBV的磁共振成像测量。这些参与者要么接受了OT治疗,要么作为非干预对照组的一部分。结果分析了7项研究,共310名参与者,以评估OT前后OBV的变化。训练显著改善整体单侧OBV 2.14 mm3 [Z = 5.27;95%置信区间(CI) = 1.34-2.93;3 P (Z = 4.47; 95%可信区间,1.07 - -2.75;P 3 (Z = 3.26; 95%可信区间,1.68 - -6.75;P =措施)。在非鼻窦相关性OD患者中,OT导致左OBV增加1.52 mm3 (Z = 2.66; 95%CI, 0.40-2.64; P =。008),右侧OBV增加2.40 mm3 (Z = 3.74; 95%CI, 1.14-3.66; P = 0.30)。相比之下,未接受OT治疗的非鼻窦相关性OD患者在OT后OBV无明显变化(Z = 0.74, P = 0.46)。结论:本荟萃分析提供的证据表明,在非鼻窦相关性OD患者中,OT与OBV的小幅但有统计学意义的增加有关。非鼻窦相关性OD患者的左OB和右OB的OBV增加具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.50%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication committed to expanding knowledge and publishing the best clinical and basic research within the fields of Rhinology & Allergy. Its focus is to publish information which contributes to improved quality of care for patients with nasal and sinus disorders. Its primary readership consists of otolaryngologists, allergists, and plastic surgeons. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书